Tag Archives: “traumatization”

More on the Age of Consent

03 Saturday Sep 2016

Posted by in "traumatization", Abigail Simon, age of consent, CSA victimology, Kathryn Ronk, sex offender registry, statutory rape, Uncategorized, women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters", women as rapists, women sex offenders

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , ,

If adult men in their 20’s and 30’s and 40’s and beyond -including, apparently, violent and recidivist criminals who’ve never been convicted of a sexual offense- are free to have sex with hundreds of 16- and 17-year-old females and/or males, then how can can male and female teachers who have sex with 16- and 17-year-old students be charged with “third-degree criminal sexual conduct,” a life-shattering felony with a maximum sentence of 6-15 years in prison, and sentenced to months in jail, if lucky, or years in prison and all the other draconian/Orwellian punishments, including registration for life or at least 20-30 years and all that that entails in respect to privacy and freedom and hate-mail and death-threats, by mail or in person, hostility and ostracism, and possibly even violence or vandalism.

To those of us who are sane and just and rational, if it’s legal for adults to have sex with young men and women of 16 and 17 if not in positions of authority over them, then teachers who have sex with students of 16 and 17 should be simply punished, non-criminally, by dismissal and the revocation of their licenses and expulsion from the profession.

Apparently, in the view of those who wrote and enacted these laws with such exceptions and distinctions in states like Michigan in which the generic age of consent is 16, females of 16 and 17 are old and mature enough to consent to sex with males 5 or 10 or 20 years older and are not “traumatized” and “scarred for life” by acts of coitus and fellatio or whatever -even with criminals, apparently, who’ve never been convicted of a sexual offense and are inclined to be abusive in noncriminal ways- but male students of 16 and 17 and now even 18 who have sex with female teachers are not old and mature enough to consent simply because the woman is in a position of authority over them -even if her authority is not misused in any sense to coerce or manipulate her “victim” into engaging in “unwanted sex against his will,” and even if he was the aggressor and initiator and she acquiesced out of fear and even if he harassed and molested and raped her before she acquiesced, and thus he is harmed, profoundly and permanently, and she must be punished, severely and for the rest of her life or at least for 20-30 years.

Kathryn Ronk: Crucified Because Her Family and Friends Didn’t Mention the “Victim.”

30 Tuesday Aug 2016

Posted by in "traumatization", age of consent, CSA victimology, Kathryn Ronk, sex offender registry, statutory rape, Uncategorized, women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters", women as rapists, women sex offenders

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , ,

At sentencing, in a black-and-white unisex jumpsuit and handcuffs attached to a waist-chain and leg-irons, deferring to the advice of her lawyer and others, she played her assigned role in this ritual of atonement and degradation, acknowledging the heinousness of her crimes and expressing remorse, sincerely or insincerely, and apologizing to her “victim,” a biological man of 15 whom she transported to sexual paradise in a factually consensual relationship.

All for nothing, nothing but an exercise in futility, wishful-thinking, and gratuitous mortification -since the judge, doubtless a feminist and left-liberal and CSA victimologist, fanatical and dogmatic, imposed the maximum sentence of 6-15 years in prison for third-degree criminal sexual conduct. And one of her reasons for doing so was that none of the letters and emails the judge received from family and friends calling for “mercy” for a woman who never committed a violent or other malum in se crime in her life and never will and is not a “threat to society” or to anyone nor even a danger to “re-offend” by having sex with another young man under statutory age, and whose crimes are legal acts in dozens of other nations, including European countries -not one of them mentioned the “victim”, apparently, or acknowledged and emphasized  his purely imaginary and definitional “traumatization”

Although Oakland County Judge Nanci Grant appreciated Ronk’s apology, she said she’d taken offense at the letters of support that she had received from the defendant’s friends and family.

“I have never seen letters of support for a defendant with nothing about victim,” Grant Said, according to the Detroit News. “They were all about you and what you were going through. Poor you…You did something you shouldn’t have done.”

In calling for “mercy” for Kathryn, and imploring the judge to impose a “lenient” sentence -i.e., “only” 6-12 months in jail or 1-2 years in prison and a lifetime or at least 20-30 years of draconian/Orwellian persecution- perhaps her family and friends didn’t think it wise to speak of a women they loved and liked as a “rapist” and “pedophile” and “child molester,” a species of monster and degenerate, and her lover as a “child” and “victim” of rape and CSA who’ll be “traumatized,” devastated, and “scarred for life.”

Perhaps the reason they didn’t mention the “victim” is because there was no “victim,” factually as opposed to legally, as distinguished from cases of aggravated assault, armed robbery, muggings, home invasions, kidnappings, burglary, vandalism, arson, murder, violent/forcible rape, the sexual assaults of  prepubertal  children, boys and girls, who are too young and immature to consent to sex in a meaningful and comprehending sense. As I’ve explained in scores of articles and blog-posts, the de jure “victim” was not a “child” but a young man of 15 who assented to or initiated sex with his pretty teacher in a de facto consensual relationship.

“Poor you,” the judge sneered at a woman crying and in shackles. Yes, how can people, including her family and friends, be sympathetic toward a “rapist” and “child abuser” and insensitive and apathetic toward a “victim” of “rape” and “child sexual abuse” who’s “traumatized” and “scarred for life” in the imaginations of CSA victimolgists, including this odious and vengeful judge, so callous and cruel that they don’t even mention him and his purely chimerical sufferings.

How can they, including her family and friends, be so callous as not to realize that the travail of a woman they know and love and/or care about, a first-offender convicted of a nonviolent and victimless and malum prohibitum crime, who will be enslaved for at least 6-years if not longer in a hellish prison and then subjected to a lifetime or at least 20-30 years of draconian/Orwellian persecution, including public sex offender registration, is negligible compared to the sufferings of her phantasmal and theoretical “victim,” i.e,  the biological man of 15 she transported to sexual paradise.

It’s possible that at least some of them might agree with me and others I’ve quoted in articles and blog-posts that it’s false and absurd to define such women as “rapists” and “pedophiles” and their lovers as “children” and “victims” whose lives are shattered, profoundly and permanently, by sex they craved and enjoyed far more than their de jure victimizers.

Her “Victim” Should Sue the Media and the State of Michigan.

28 Sunday Aug 2016

Posted by in "traumatization", Abigail Simon, appeal, CSA victimology, lawsuit, Uncategorized, women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters", women as rapists, women sex offenders

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , ,

“Battery,” “emotional distress,” “anxiety,” “psychological pain and suffering,” “freight and shock and embarrassment, humiliation, and mortification (talk about redundancy!),” “trauma,” ad nauseam.

If any of this is true rather than contrived and imagined and grossly exaggerated, and probably or clearly a result of this affair as a whole (the intrigue, her arrest, incarceration, prosecution, the pre-trial hearings, trial, conviction, sentencing, her current enslavement, appeal, re-sentencing, his lawsuit, etc.) rather than the stresses of life in general and being a college student and football player, it’s not a result of his liaison with Abigail as a young man of 15 but rather a corollary of the law, the criminal justice system and its gendarmes and functionaries, and the media:

* the arrest and jailing of the woman he loved and who gave him the sex he craved and enjoyed more than her and may have initiated even if she’s lying about his forcing himself on her; the destruction of their love affair and separation from the woman he loved and who loved him, if she’s lying, and whom she transported, willingly, to carnal elysium if the liaison was fully or largely consensual;

* her prosecution, the pre-trial hearings in which he first testified that he forced himself on Abigail and then claimed the sex was factually consensual, apparently threatened with charges of rape if he didn’t change his story so Abigail could be charged with 4-counts of first-degree CSC rather than simply “accosting a minor for immoral purposes;” the trial and hours of testimony under cross-examination; her conviction and incarceration;

* the sentencing in which she was shackled, gratuitously for no exigent and practical reason for over 2-hours, in handcuffs attacked to a waist-chain and leg-irons, so debilitated by fear and despair and anguish and lack of sleep that she could barely walk or even stand and almost collapsed twice; often sobbing, before the judge sentenced her to 8-25 years in prison and a lifetime of draconian/Orwellian persecution; her enslavement, the appeal (denied by the trial judge and then an appellate court), her imminent or ultimate  re-sentencing;

* and iatrogenic therapy whose purpose is to convince him that the sex he craved and enjoyed, the sex he experienced, consciously, as thrilling and gratifying and empowering, was traumatizing subconsciously; to brainwash him into realizing that he was/is a “victim” of Abigail who is “scarred for life” even if he wasn’t cognizant of his “trauma” and of being a “victim” of “sexual assault,” and that the woman he “thought” he loved and who gave him the sex he “thought” he craved and enjoyed was a “rapist” and “pedophile” and “child molester.”

Yes, if not for the law, criminal justice system, and media coverage, local, state, national, and even international, nobody would have been hurt, profoundly and permanently, if at all, by this intrigue -not only Abigail, by far most hellishly, and her “loved ones,” family and friends, whose anguish is excruciating, but also the “victim,” assuming she’s lying and that he was her lover and not her victimizer, and his family. Yes, he should file a lawsuit against the media and the State of Michigan.

Questions But No Answers

16 Tuesday Aug 2016

Posted by in "traumatization", Abigail Simon, CSA victimology, lawsuit, Uncategorized, women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters", women as rapists, women sex offenders

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , ,

What of the re-sentencing, ordered long ago after Michigan’s Supreme Court ruled that mandatory-minimum sentences are “unconstitutional”? Internet searches disclose nothing specific, or even current. She’s now been enslaved for over 21 months, first in jail and then in prison. Will she be enslaved for another 3-6 months before she finds out how many more years she’ll be enslaved and abused and degraded and tormented. And at her re-sentencing, she’ll be in handcuffs attached to a waist-chain and leg-irons, probably for over 2-hours as she was at her initial sentencing, when there’s no exigent and practical reason she must be shackled in this fashion or any fashion to protect anyone or to prevent her from escaping, unlike violent male criminals who, if not so restrained, could assault the prosecutor, judge, a jail-guard, etc., possibly even killing them with a single punch (or breaking jaws, noses, eye-sockets, knocking out teeth), or run out of the courtroom and onto the streets to commit more crimes and who knows what else before they’re apprehended in hours or days or weeks or months -if ever.

And what of the lawsuit, filed long ago, which alleges that her “victim” is so traumatized by having had sex with Abigail in spring of 2013 that he can’t study, attend classes, play football, work, etc., and was forced to “drop out” of college and can never return to earn a degree -even though he wasn’t cognizant of being “traumatized,” “devastated,” and “scarred for life” when having sex with Abigail and sending her texts and emails and was under the illusion that he was doing so as a free agent, willingly and knowingly, and that the sex was thrilling and gratifying and empowering, as was the sex-talk, the emails and texts, because that’s how he “thought” he experienced her “crimes” due to “male socialization,” the artificial “social construct” of “manliness”/”masculinity,” and its resultant “false consciousness,” blissfully unaware that his life was being shattered, profoundly and permanently, radically and irremediably.

The Kafkaesque/Orwellian fantasy world of CSA victimology, ludicrous but malevolent. Only CSA victimology and hours and hours of iatrogenic therapy would induce and compel him to realize his traumatization. Only iatrogenic psycho-therapy can mollify but never cure the trauma of which he was unaware until he was subjected to iatrogenic psycho-therapy and CSA victimology propaganda/indoctrination.

 

“Blocked” by Barton

15 Monday Aug 2016

Posted by in Abigail Simon, age of consent, Barton Dieters, CSA victimology, Debra Lafave, Uncategorized, women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters", women as rapists

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , ,

On Aug. 1, 2016, I sent this email to four people, including Martin Tieber and Barton Dieters:

In a sane and just and rational country, she would not have even been charged with a crime but simply punished, non-criminally, by dismissal and revocation of her license and expulsion from the profession. All this is more than punishment enough for transporting a biological man of 15 to sexual paradise and “inappropriate”/unprofessional behavior. Imagine what this would entail and how it would blight her life if she couldn’t find another job or was forced to work for the minimum-wage at a fast-food restaurant or wherever. And so forth.

Or, at worst, charged with a misdemeanor and, if convicted, sentenced to 3-6 months of probation and 5-100 hours of “community service,” and perhaps also fined modestly -all of which is not only excessive but gratuitous in respect to “public safety” and deterring and preventing violent and other serious crimes.

No jail, no prison, no “sex-offender treatment (to “treat” her for what exactly, heterosexuality?), no quasi-totalitarian surveillance; no electronic parole monitoring with an ankle tether/”bracelet”; no public sex-offender registration, with her name,  mug-shot, and address on the internet, observable to everyone with access to a computer(s), not only in the U.S. but in the entire world, so myriads of those who hate her can send her hate-mail and death-threats, and, for many, ostracize, revile, harass, and threaten her in person, and, possibly for some or at least a few, vandalize her property and/or even assault or murder her -all this until she dies at age 77 or 84 or 92. I suggest you go to RSOL and read many or some of the articles and comments as to what it’s like to be on the sex-offendeer registry.

8-25 years in prison and a lifetime of draconian/Orwellian persecution for a first-offender convicted of nonviolent and victimless and mala prohibita crimes that are legal acts in dozens of other nations, including European countries; a woman who has never committed a violent or other malum in se crime in her life and never will and is not a “threat to society” or to anyone nor even a danger to “re-offend” by having sex with another young man under statutory age.

And the generic age of consent in Michigan is 16. If he had been 16, just a few months and weeks older, and she had not been his tutor (or had been a tutor at another high school?), their affair would have been legal under Michigan law.

Dieters was so enraged and appalled by what I wrote that he blocked me immediately, so he didn’t read my criticism of him in a second email for which I received an “undeliverable” message:

On this matter, the media (local, state, national) is less a source of neutral and objective news than a tendentious agent of CSA victimology propaganda and inculcation in which all critical/dissenting voices are suppressed, almost as if under a totalitarian regime, or denounced and derided and defamed.

And sensationalism and histrionics for the ratings in the Letourneau, Lafave, Simon, and many other cases, mass-hysteria and “frenzy” over what is in fact a trivial matter that should be covered swiftly and quietly and, in my opinion, shouldn’t even be a crime and surely not a felony.

In covering this story, Dieters was less a reporter than a cheerleader for the prosecution and CSA victimology propagandist. To offer but one of many examples: a reporter who uses the phrase “ex-tutor guilty of raping her student” is not a journalist, neutral and objective, but an activist, ideologue, propagandist, CSA victimologist, who uses language not to describe but rather to distort and pervert objective reality for ideological purposes.

Kathryn Ronk: Another Teacher Crucified

23 Saturday Jul 2016

Posted by in Abigail Simon, CSA victimology, Kathryn Ronk, plea-bargain, sex offender registry, statutory rape, Uncategorized, women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters", women as rapists

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , ,

In March of 2015 in Oakland County, Michigan, Kathryn Ronk was sentenced to 6-15 years in prison for having sex with a 15-year-old male student. Initially charged with 5-counts of first-degree criminal sexual conduct, like Abigail Simon, with a maximum sentence of 25-years to life in prison and a mandatory minimum of 8-25 years, she plad guilty to 2 counts of third-degree CSC and was thus sentenced to “only” 6-15 years in prison in a country in which, during the 1990s, the average time-served for murder was less than 6-years and the average time-served for all violent felonies was approximately 4-years. And now, as opposed to the 1990s, the decade when the U>S. began to “get tough on crime’:

Washington– More that half (57 percent) of violent offenders who were released from state prison in 2016 served less than three years before their release, the Bureau of Justice Statistics announced today. About 1 in 25 violent offenders served 30 years or more before their release.

The average time an offender served in state prison in 2016, from the date of admission to initial release, was 2.6 years. The medium amount of time served…was 1-3 years. Persons serving less than one year in state prison made up 40 percent of first releases in 2016…Based on 3016 release data, the average time served before initial release by state prisoners who were sentenced for a violent offense was 4.7 years and the medium time was 2-4 years…

And unlike Kathryn Ronk, a first-offender convicted of a nonviolent and victimless and malum probibitum felony, I’m certain that at least 90% of these violent offenders were recidivist male criminals, most of them with histories of violence and criminality beginning at age 13 or 14 or 15.

And when she’s released from prison after “only” 6 or 8 or 10 years (?), she’ll be subjected to all the post/extra incarceration punishments, including registration for life or at least 20-30 years as a uniquely vile and execrable criminal, theoretically more dangerous and likely to commit violent and mala in se crimes than myriads of brutes and savages who’ve committed dozens and scores of felonies but have never been convicted of a sexual offense albeit most of them have raped or gang-raped men in jails and prisons and/or women (including underage adolescent girls) in the free world.

But, according to Michigan Sex Crime Attorneys, she’s a “very lucky lady indeed:”

Because Ronk, a former Spanish teacher at a Catholic High School, was accused of having sex with her student in a number of places, the crimes were charged in two separate counties….As a result, although she has already been sentenced Oakland County, her sentence in Macomb County is only now coming around.

But in this regard, Ms. Ronk is a very lucky lady indeed. After pleading guilty to a single charge of third-degree criminal sexual conduct in Macomb Couty, Circuit Court Judge Mary Chrzanowski sentenced Ronk to another 6 to 15 years in prison. But what makes this good news instead of bad, is the fact that the judge ordered the sentences served concurrently.

This is a great turn of events for Ronk who, at age 30, may spend as little as six years behind bars. What this means is that she, unlike many other teachers convicted of student-related CSC crimes, has a chance at getting out of prison with enough time to have a chance at life again. (sexcrimeattorneys.com., 7-12-2015.)

(Ponder the absurdity: if an adult women and a young man under age 16 have sex twice, intercourse and/or fellatio in the bedroom and “sexual contact” in the living room, and one room is in one county and the other room in another jurisdiction, she can be prosecuted, convicted, and sentenced in both jurisdictions. And if she pleads guilty to third-degree criminal sexual conduct, as did Mrs. Ronk, who is married, incidentally, she might have to serve two sentences of 6-15 years in prison if the second judge to sentence her doesn’t rule that the sentences be served concurrently.

Yes, what luck! “As little as 6 years behind bars” and then a lifetime of at least 20-30 years of draconian/Orwellian persecution! By this reasoning, Abigail Simon is also “very lucky,” since she has a chance of serving “only” 8-years in prison and thus the good luck and blessing of “having a chance at life again.”! How grateful they should be for the leniency they’ve been afforded!

To repeat: in a sane and just and rational country, neither woman would have even been charged with a crime but simply punished, non-criminally, by dismissal and revocation of their licenses and expulsion from the profession. Or, at worst, charged with a misdemeanor and, if convicted, sentenced to 3-6 months of probation and 50-100 hours of community service. And perhaps also fined modestly. I would aruge that neither woman should have been sentenced, if guilty of a  misdemeanor, to even  a  day in jail much less 6 or 8 years in prison, if “lucky,” and possibly much longer! Nor to sex-offender treatment, quasi-totalitarian surveillance, electronic parole-monitory with an ankle=tether/”bracelet,” and public sex-offender registration.

In Michigan, apparently, even most lawyers who defend those accused of sex-crimes are CSA victimologists, dogmatists who believe the laws are sane and just and rational, and that sentences of 6-15 years or 8-25 years in prison and all the other penalties are not at all excessive and draconian for first-offenders convicted of nonviolent and victimless and malum prohibita crimes that are legal acts in dozens of other nations, including European countries, punishment that is “cruel and unusual”for women who’ve never committed a violent or other malum in se crime in their lives and never will and are not a “threat to society” or to anyone nor even a danger to “re-offend” by having sex with another young man under statutory age.

Melissa is to Blame for the Murder

21 Thursday Jul 2016

Posted by in "traumatization", CSA victimology, Melissa Bittner, sex offender registry, statutory rape, Uncategorized, women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters", women as rapists, women sex offenders

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , ,

According to CSA victimologists, biological men under age 18 who have sex (including “sexual contact,” e.g., Melissa and her “victim”) with adult women at least 4-5 years older are “traumatized,” devastated, and “scarred for life.” And the harm is more intense, the “trauma” and “scars” wider and deeper and more crippling and disfiguring, if the woman is a teacher. Theoretically, irrespective of the facts and circumstances, the disparity in age between adult and “child” that “scars” the “victim” is rendered more traumatic and devastating by her power and authority, even though, in reality as opposed to theory, Melissa’s “victim” had all the power.

And thus everything bad that happens to them from then on is blamed on their sexual victimization as “children” and “little boys”: a history and record of violence and criminality, especially acts of rape and sexual assault, alcoholism, drug-addiction, “sex-addiction,” divorce, failed relationships, impotence, depression, mental illness, suicide, attempted suicide, thoughts of suicide, etc., all misfortunes and maladies that afflict only persons who were raped and/or otherwise sexually-assaulted, especially as children, including young men under age 18 who were “raped” and “molested” by adult females, especially teachers.

Of males who suffer from the maladies and misfortunes above, what percentage had sex with adult women as young men under age 18 and what percentage did not have sex with adult females? The answer to this question -99%(?) who did not and 1%(?) who did have sex with adult women- overwhelmingly refutes the dogmas and theories and fantasies of CSA victimologists. And even if men who did have sex with adult women as young men under age 18 suffer or did suffer from any of these and other maladies and misfortunes, there’s absolutely no reason to assume that all or any of this is or was an effect of having sex with an adult female months or years or even decades ago, surely not in most instances, and surely not the only or primary cause. But facts, no matter how simple and obvious and irrefutable, don’t matter to CSA victimologists.

And thus I’m certain that his lawyers and various “experts” hired by the defense attributed the murder and its causative motives and mental states to his sexual victimization by Melissa. Perhaps this resulted in an indulgent sentence, so he’s now free to rape and/or murder again. And if free, he can go online and visit the sex-offender registries of Ohio and Wisconsin which disclose Melissa’s address and possibly visit her some warm summer night -not merely to “hump” her and force her to touch his penis but also to rape and murder her?

Have You No Shame, “Super” Shyster?

12 Sunday Jun 2016

Posted by in Abigail Simon, age of consent, CSA victimology, lawsuit, statutory rape, Uncategorized, women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters", women as rapists, women sex offenders

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , ,

Grand Rapids, MI -The 15-year-old victim of sexual assault by Catholic school tutor Abigail Simon is 18 now and has filed a lawsuit seeking at least $25,000 from Simon, the private school system, the diocese and several administrators.

The now 18-year-old graduate of Catholic Central High School is represented by Detroit-based Ven Johnson -a so-called “super lawyer” and one-time partner of Geofrey Fieger…

Johnson says the goal of the suit is to bring the diocese out of the dark-ages” when it comes to the sexual abuse of students, including male students, by staff or teachers. “You cannot do this to children and pretend not to notice,” Johnson said, adding that in such cases as these the Catholic Church has tried to “ignore them and sweep them under the rug.” (An allusion to the “priestly pedophilia scandal” and mass-hysteria of the 1990s, M.K.)

The suit alleges the school district and the Roman Catholic Diocese of Grand Rapids did know and or should have known about the six-month sexual liaison between the teen and the $50,000 per-year athletic tutor in 2013.

The new lawsuit accuses Simon…of battery and emotional distress as a result of her criminal actions. “Simon’s conduct in this case is so outrageous in character, and so extreme in degree, as to go beyond all possible limits of decency and is to be regarded as atrocious and utterly intolerable in a civilized community,” the suit opines.

The 18-year-old star athlete in high school was briefly on the roster for a MAC conference university until Johnson says he was forced to drop out due to anxiety, depression, psychological pain and suffering, freight and shock and embarrassment, humiliation and mortification. The suit claims that the teen has diminished earning capacity as a result of his trauma. “It absolutely screws up these young people,” Johnson said. (Barton Deiters, “Teen sex assault victim files lawsuit against tutor, Catholic schools, diocese,” mlive.com., 12-2-2015.

Is he a liar, willing to say anything -no matter how execrable, ludicrous, idiotic, deranged, outrageous, chimerical, grossly exaggerated, demonstrably false- to win a case. Or does he actually believe this nonsense, this grotesque, howling, psychotic nonsense, the title of a post in which I quote Harris Mirkin.

If so, he’s psychotic, totally delusional, completely impervious to and estranged from objective reality, as are all CSA victimologists, and the tens of millions of people they’ve indoctrinated, in respect to all liaisons between young men under age 16 or even 18 and adult women at least 4-5 years older, factually consensual sex in which the “victim” is often if not usually the aggressor and initiator of his phantasmal and theoretical “victimization, which may well have been true in this case even if Abigail is lying about his forcing himself on her. And MRAs, the misogynist vermin of the soi-disant “men’s movement,” who are obsessed with adult women, especially teachers, “raping” young men under age 18, and the millions of men and who knows how many women they’ve poisoned with their toxic melange of woman-hatred and mindless egalitarianism.

Abigail Simon and the End of “Civilization” in Michigan.

04 Saturday Jun 2016

Posted by in Abigail Simon, age of consent, CSA victimology, lawsuit, statutory rape, Uncategorized, women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters", women as rapists, women sex offenders

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , ,

“Simon’s conduct in this case is so outrageous in character, and so extreme in degree, as to go beyond all possible limits of decency and is to be regarded as atrocious and utterly intolerable in a civilized community,” the suit opines.

This lawsuit would be risible if it weren’t so hateful and pernicious, so outrageous, atrocious, intolerable, and extreme in its lies and delusions, so inimical to honesty, realism, decency, fairness.

Johnson lives in Detroit, not in the city, I’m sure, but rather in a mansion in one of the most affluent suburbs.The headline from Forbes: “America’s Most Dangerous Cities: Detroit Can’t Shake NO. 1 Spot.” To quote from the article’s first sentence, “…the Motor City once again tops Forbes’ list of America’s Most Dangerous Cities. (Daniel Fisher, 10-29-2015.)

I checked out the crime statistics for Detroit at citydata.com: 

In 2006, there were 418 murders, 593 rapes, 7240 robberies, 13,143 assaults, 18,134 burglaries, 21,287 thefts, and 22,917 auto thefts. In 2012, there were 386 murders, 441 rapes, 4843 robberies, and 9341 assaults. In 2013, the last year for crime statistics, there were 316 murders, 618 rapes, 4774 robberies, and 8796 assaults.

In Flint, Abigail’s “home town” apparently, pop. 99,763, there were 63 murders, 108 rapes, 673 robberies, and 1930 assaults in 2012. In 2013, there were 48 murders, 145 rapes, 447 robberies, and 1267 assaults.

In Grand Rapids, the city in which she committed her abhorrent and unspeakable crimes and was sentenced to 8-25 years in prison and a lifetime of sex offender registration and electronic parole monitoring, there were 16 murders, 46 rapes, 462 robberies, and 941 assaults in 2012. In 2013, there were 17 murders, 82 rapes, 471 robberies, and 756 assaults.

And “civilization” came to an end in Michigan in 2013 when Abigail had a love affair with a biological man of 15 -assuming she’s lying about his raping and terrorizing her- whose pleasure, realization of his “fantasy,” and love for Abigail were turned into a nightmare by the law and criminal justice system. And the media.

  • “Hateful” not only in inducing hatred of Abigail that might endanger her life both in prison and when and if she’s released but also as deserving the hatred and contempt of those who aren’t CSA victimologists, their myrmidons and votaries in the mass- media, law, politics, education, etc., and the tens of millions of  people in the United States alone, females more than males sans MRAs, the misogynist zealots of the soi-disant “men’s movement,” they’ve poisoned and propagandized.

Kirk Douglas was “Raped” by his Teacher

12 Thursday May 2016

Posted by in Abigail Simon, CSA victimology, Debra Lafave, Uncategorized, women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters", women as rapists, women sex offenders

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , ,

Kirk Douglas fondly recalls an affair with his teacher: “I had been a ragamuffin kid of 15 coping with a neighborhood filled with gangs. Under my teacher’s guidance, I became a different person. I’m eternally grateful. By today’s standards, she would have gone to jail. I had no idea we were doing something wrong. Did she?”

It’s understandable why a young man of 15 wouldn’t feel and think that something so pleasurable, so natural, so exciting. so gratifying, so empowering was “wrong.” And, obviously, given such feelings (even assuming he did feel it was “wrong” because of moral and religious inculcation), he didn’t think he was a victim of “rape” and CSA who was “traumatized,” devastated, and “scarred for life.”

What of his teacher? It’s likely she thought it was “wrong” in the sense of it being “inappropriate” and unprofessional. But perhaps she didn’t even think that. And I’m certain she didn’t think it was “wrong”in the sense of being aberrant and unnatural and/or egregiously immoral and transgressive. And, even more so, I’m sure she didn’t think it was “wrong” in the sense that she was a “rapist” and “pedophile” and “child molester,” and that her lover was a victim of “rape” and CSA who was “traumatized” and “scarred for life.”

And it’s likely that she knew or feared she was guilty of a “moral’s offense,” however defined, but wasn’t unduly worried since there was little chance of anyone knowing or suspecting they were having sex and telling school officials or calling the police.

But today, almost surely, she’d be arrested, prosecuted, convicted of a felony or felonies, and sentenced to anywhere from 6-12 in jail, if lucky, to 10-30 years in prison; to years of punitive “sex offender treatment,” both in jail or prison and after her release; years of quasi-totalitarian post-incarceration supervision; and registration for life as a uniquely monstrous and dangerous criminal. And she’d be vilified as a “sexual predator,” “child molester,” “pedophile,” and “rapist” with no penis, and Douglas would be viewed and defined as the “victim” of a traumatic and life-destroying violation even if he told the authorities and all else that he enjoyed the sex and was a willing participant -because this was his actual experience, incredulously, in contrast to the delusions of CSA victimologists.

Now, apparently, Douglas knows their affair was “wrong.” But does he think it should have been a felony as it is today and since the 1970’s or even a misdemeanor? Does he think his teacher and women like Mary Letourneau, Debra Lafave, Cassandra Sorenson-Grohall, Melissa Bittner, Abigail Simon, and many others are “rapists” and “pedophiles” who should be charged with felonies and sentenced to months in jail or years in prison and all the extra/post-incarceration punishments? It would be fascinating to read or hear his opinions in an interview in a magazine or on national television.

Ironically and paradoxically, in respect to intrigues and dalliances between young men under age 18 and adult females, above all teachers, the America of today and of the last 20-years is far more repressive, draconian, hysterical, irrational, delusional, and inquisatorial than the America of Douglas’s youth, the “good-old-days” or “bad-old-days,” depending on one’s values and politics and weltanschauung.

Savor the irony, the poetic injustice, if you will: without her guidance, he might have ended up dead or buried in prison rather than going on to become a rich and famous and legendary actor, one of the most feted and iconic of all the great movie stars of the post World-War II era. Not only did she turn him into a “different person,” not only did she enrich his life morally and artistically and intellectually, not only did she give him the sex that he craved and  enjoyed and fondly remembers, she might have even saved his life. But if they had such an affair today or in the 1990’s, her life would be blighted -profoundly, tragically, hellishly- if not utterly destroyed. She would be branded with the “new-age” scarlet letter, figuratively, until she died. She would never be free again. Unlike her “victim,” she’d be traumatized, devastated, and scarred for life.