• About

freeabigailsimon

~ women punished for having sex with biological men under age 18.

freeabigailsimon

Tag Archives: sex offenders

“Ed” comments at RSOL

24 Monday Oct 2016

Posted by Michael Kuehl in "sex-offender treatment", "traumatization", Abigail Simon, age of consent, CSA victimology, sex offender registry, statutory rape, Uncategorized, women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters", women as rapists, women sex offenders

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

"traumatization", Abigail Simon, age of consent, registry, sex offender registry, sex offenders, traumatized, women sex offenders

“Ed” denounces the lunacy and iniquity of SO laws and mandatory “treatment” -if only for adult men who have sex with young women under age 16 or 18 who are falsely defined as “children”: the pseudo-science, the delusions, the canards, the lies. And also the greed, mandatory psycho-therapy as a “racket” and business that critics deride as the “child sexual abuse industry.”

Most of our RSOL’s time is spent fighting the public registry and residency restrictions for former SOs; we should also be fighting mandatory treatment for those simply guilty of journalistic curiosity. I am currently fighting this battle alone. But I am armed with excellent scholarly articles that point up all the recent research into the serious flaws built into the sex offender laws as relating to “deviance” and the law supervised release standards that mandate “treatment.” There are a goodly number of RSOs who are not mentally ill and who do not have paraphilias of any sort. We may be on supervised release, but we have a fundamental constitutional right to refuse so-called “treatment” that is neither wanted nor needed by those who get their living by providing it.

Personally, I fail to see “deviance” in any straight heterosexual male of any age who can appreciate the beauty and grace of young women who are biological adults in terms of secondary sex characteristics but are currently under age legally. Today the law sees them as “children” and “victims” if any male they become sexually involved with is more than four years older than them. This is an insane situation and a contradiction in and of itself of natural law, as evidenced by the results of the latest scientific research.

This research is currently unaccepted by all in the prison industrial complex who are engaged in profiting by casting a very wide net over anyone convicted of a sexual offense. If the necessary and progressive legislative corrections are ever made in the criminal justice system, those providing treatment will lose half their clientel and thus half their income. It is now as it has always been -all about the money….(RSOL, “Success at NACDL Seminar,” nationalrsol.org/blog, 11-28-2015)

I replied:

Excellent points, Ed. I fully concur. Mandatory “sex-offender treatment” for adults who have sex with young men and women under age 16 or even 18 is travesty and iniquity, irrational and gratuitous. “Treatment” for what, precisely and specifically, heterosexuality? Heterosexual adults are attracted to young men and women under age 18 for the same reason they’re attracted to men and women of 18 and 19 and to those in their 20s and 30s and 40s and beyond.

People can argue, reasonably, that having sex with those under age 16 is “wrong” and “immoral” and “inappropriate” and, for teachers, unprofessional. I, for one, wouldn’t even say that in many instances. But such acts per se are not “deviant” in the sense of being aberrant or unnatural. And, consequently, adults who have sex with young men and women under age 16 or even 18 are not afflicted with some kind of serious “disorder” or “paraphilia” that requires months and years of psycho-therapy and “sex-offender treatment.” mandatory and punitive and degrading, both in and out of jails and/or prisons, and conducted by fanatics and mountebanks, or simply greedy opportunists. Yes, the “child sexual abuse industry.”

If adults who have sex with young men and women under age 16 or even 18 are afflicted with a disorder and “paraphilia” and thus in need of psycho-therapy, then so are adults who are attracted to young men and women under age 16 or even 18 even if they don’t have sex with them, which includes almost everyone, male and female, heterosexual and homosexual, everyone but pedophiles, true pedophiles, who are exclusively attracted to prepubescent children, girls or boys. If such people are “pedophiles,” then everyone is a “pedophile” with the exception of authentic pedophiles.

And the laws and policies he assails as insane and unjust are even more so when applied to women who transport young men under age 18 to carnal elysium. And even to those who were sexually-harassed, molested, sexually-assaulted, and raped by their “victims,” like Cassandra Sorenson-Grohall, Melissa Bittner, and possibly Abigail Simon.

 

More on the Age of Consent

03 Saturday Sep 2016

Posted by Michael Kuehl in "traumatization", Abigail Simon, age of consent, CSA victimology, Kathryn Ronk, sex offender registry, statutory rape, Uncategorized, women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters", women as rapists, women sex offenders

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

"traumatization", Abigail Simon, age of consent, media sex hysteria, sex offender registry, sex offenders, traumatized, women as rapists, women sex offenders

If adult men in their 20’s and 30’s and 40’s and beyond -including, apparently, violent and recidivist criminals who’ve never been convicted of a sexual offense- are free to have sex with hundreds of 16- and 17-year-old females and/or males, then how can can male and female teachers who have sex with 16- and 17-year-old students be charged with “third-degree criminal sexual conduct,” a life-shattering felony with a maximum sentence of 6-15 years in prison, and sentenced to months in jail, if lucky, or years in prison and all the other draconian/Orwellian punishments, including registration for life or at least 20-30 years and all that that entails in respect to privacy and freedom and hate-mail and death-threats, by mail or in person, hostility and ostracism, and possibly even violence or vandalism.

To those of us who are sane and just and rational, if it’s legal for adults to have sex with young men and women of 16 and 17 if not in positions of authority over them, then teachers who have sex with students of 16 and 17 should be simply punished, non-criminally, by dismissal and the revocation of their licenses and expulsion from the profession.

Apparently, in the view of those who wrote and enacted these laws with such exceptions and distinctions in states like Michigan in which the generic age of consent is 16, females of 16 and 17 are old and mature enough to consent to sex with males 5 or 10 or 20 years older and are not “traumatized” and “scarred for life” by acts of coitus and fellatio or whatever -even with criminals, apparently, who’ve never been convicted of a sexual offense and are inclined to be abusive in noncriminal ways- but male students of 16 and 17 and now even 18 who have sex with female teachers are not old and mature enough to consent simply because the woman is in a position of authority over them -even if her authority is not misused in any sense to coerce or manipulate her “victim” into engaging in “unwanted sex against his will,” and even if he was the aggressor and initiator and she acquiesced out of fear and even if he harassed and molested and raped her before she acquiesced, and thus he is harmed, profoundly and permanently, and she must be punished, severely and for the rest of her life or at least for 20-30 years.

Reflections on the Age of Consent

02 Friday Sep 2016

Posted by Michael Kuehl in CSA victimology, Kathryn Ronk, sex offender registry, statutory rape, Uncategorized, women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters", women as rapists, women sex offenders

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Abigail Simon, Abigail Simon resentencing, age of consent, Kathryn Ronk, registry, sex offender registry, sex offenders, women as rapists, women sex offenders

Under Michigan law and the laws of other states in which the generic age of consent is 16 but sex with 15-year-old’s is a felony, it’s legal for adult men ages 18 to 80 to have sex with girls the moment the clock strikes 12AM on their 16th birthdays if they aren’t in a position of authority over them. And, apparently, this includes those convicted of violent and other mala in se felonies, even dozens or scores of them, but who’ve never been convicted of a sexual offense. (I’m not sure of this but, so far, internet searches have not answered my questions.)

But, in Michigan, a 20-year-old woman who has sex with a young man a day or hour or minute before he turns 16 is guilty of “third-degree criminal sexual conduct,” a felony with a maximum sentence of 6-15 years in prison and all the extra/post incarceration punishments, including registration for life or at least 20-30 years as a uniquely monstrous and degenerate criminals, theoretically more dangerous than myriads of brutes and savages with histories of crime beginning at age 13 or 14 or 15 who’ve committed dozens and scores of violent and other mala in se crimes but who’ve never been convicted of a sexual offense albeit most of them have surely raped and/or gang-raped men in jails and prisons and/or women and girls in the “free world.”

And if the woman is in a position of authority over him, a teacher or tutor, like Abigail Simon and Kathryn Ronk, she’s guilty of “first-degree criminal sexual conduct,” punishable by a mandatory-minimum of 8-25 years in prison and a maximum sentence of 25-years to life and a lifetime of public sex-offender registration and electronic parole monitoring with a ankle-tether/”bracelet -if, like Abigail, one spurns a number of plea-bargains and  is convicted at trial of first-degree CSC., even one “count” rather than several.

Clearly, if de facto consensual sex between 15-year-olds and adult men and women is so heinous a crime that those who aren’t in positions of authority over them are guilty of “third-degree criminal sexual conduct” and subject to all the penalties above, and those who are in positions of authority over them could be sentenced to 25-years to life in prison and a lifetime of draconian/Orwellian persecution, then how can sex between 16-year-olds and adults not in positions of authority over them be legal?

And, conversely, if consensual sex between 16-year-olds and adults not in positions of power over them is legal -even, apparently, for violent and/or recidivist criminals who’ve never been convicted of a sexual offense- then how can adult men and women who have sex with 15-year-olds be charged with felonies and sentenced to months in jail or years in prison and all the other draconian/Orwellian punishments? And how can Abigail Simon be sentenced to 8-25 years in prison and a lifetime of public sex-offender registration and electronic parole monitoring?

What’s the difference between the average 16-year-old and the average 15-year-old? Virtually nothing, generally, and in respect to sexuality, absolutely nothing. Moreover, there are millions of 14- and 15-year-olds who are more or far more intelligent, mature, and sexually experienced, sophisticated, and “active” than millions of 16- and 17-year-old’s. To say nothing of the differences, physically and psychologically, between the sexes.

Clearly, to those of us who are sane and just and rational, if factually consensual sex between 16-year-olds and adults not in positions of authority over them is legal but sex between adults and young men and women under age 16 must be criminalized, as I concede for the sake of argument, then I would argue that such acts be criminalized not as felonies but as misdemeanors -at least for adults who’ve never been convicted of violent and other mala in se crimes– and a sentence of probation should be mandatory for all first-offenders: 3-6 months of probation with perhaps 50-100 hours of some kind of “community service,” but without the current restrictions on freedoms and intrusions into private lives that don’t apply to violent recidivists who’ve never been convicted of a sexual offense; no prison, no jail, no electronic parole monitoring, no public sex-offender registration; and no”sex-offender treatment”: years of psycho-therapy, usually by quacks and zealots and psychotics, and often iatrogenic, to “treat” the offenders for what precisely, what perversion,”paraphilia,”or “disorder,” heterosexuality?

All jurisdictions from nations to states must have an age of consent -whether 16 or 17 or 18 as in all U.S. states, or 14 or 15 as in many other nations, including European countries, or 13 in some nations, including Spain until just recently, or 12 as in Mexico- and some degree of arbitrariness and inequity and hair-splitting is ineluctable -but this is insane.

 

Questions But No Answers

16 Tuesday Aug 2016

Posted by Michael Kuehl in "traumatization", Abigail Simon, CSA victimology, lawsuit, Uncategorized, women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters", women as rapists, women sex offenders

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

"traumatization", Abigail Simon, Abigail Simon lawsuit, Abigail Simon resentencing, age of consent, media sex hysteria, sex offender registry, sex offenders, women as rapists, women sex offenders

What of the re-sentencing, ordered long ago after Michigan’s Supreme Court ruled that mandatory-minimum sentences are “unconstitutional”? Internet searches disclose nothing specific, or even current. She’s now been enslaved for over 21 months, first in jail and then in prison. Will she be enslaved for another 3-6 months before she finds out how many more years she’ll be enslaved and abused and degraded and tormented. And at her re-sentencing, she’ll be in handcuffs attached to a waist-chain and leg-irons, probably for over 2-hours as she was at her initial sentencing, when there’s no exigent and practical reason she must be shackled in this fashion or any fashion to protect anyone or to prevent her from escaping, unlike violent male criminals who, if not so restrained, could assault the prosecutor, judge, a jail-guard, etc., possibly even killing them with a single punch (or breaking jaws, noses, eye-sockets, knocking out teeth), or run out of the courtroom and onto the streets to commit more crimes and who knows what else before they’re apprehended in hours or days or weeks or months -if ever.

And what of the lawsuit, filed long ago, which alleges that her “victim” is so traumatized by having had sex with Abigail in spring of 2013 that he can’t study, attend classes, play football, work, etc., and was forced to “drop out” of college and can never return to earn a degree -even though he wasn’t cognizant of being “traumatized,” “devastated,” and “scarred for life” when having sex with Abigail and sending her texts and emails and was under the illusion that he was doing so as a free agent, willingly and knowingly, and that the sex was thrilling and gratifying and empowering, as was the sex-talk, the emails and texts, because that’s how he “thought” he experienced her “crimes” due to “male socialization,” the artificial “social construct” of “manliness”/”masculinity,” and its resultant “false consciousness,” blissfully unaware that his life was being shattered, profoundly and permanently, radically and irremediably.

The Kafkaesque/Orwellian fantasy world of CSA victimology, ludicrous but malevolent. Only CSA victimology and hours and hours of iatrogenic therapy would induce and compel him to realize his traumatization. Only iatrogenic psycho-therapy can mollify but never cure the trauma of which he was unaware until he was subjected to iatrogenic psycho-therapy and CSA victimology propaganda/indoctrination.

 

Systemic Coddling of Violent Criminals: The Facts

24 Sunday Jul 2016

Posted by Michael Kuehl in Abigail Simon, Cassandra, CSA victimology, Kathryn Ronk, Uncategorized, women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters", women as rapists, women sex offenders

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Abigail Simon, Cassandra Sorenson-Grohall, media sex hysteria, sex offenders, women as rapists, women sex offenders

“Through courts, cops, and correction agencies, government combats but never comes close to conquering crime,” laments John I. Dilulio. “Even on its most aggressive days, the justice system works like a sorting machine, incarcerating only a small fraction even of known, adjudicated, violent criminals…In 1994, Americans experienced some 4.2 million murders, rapes, robberies, and aggravated assaults. That same year, states convicted about 146, 000 persons for these violent crimes, but sent only about 98,000 of them to prison.” (“Against Mandatory Minimums: Drug sentencing run amok,” National Review, May 17, 1999, pp. 48-49.)

As for all felonies, Joseph Perkins concisely summarizes Justice Department statistics: “Of 100 felony complaints filed  by private citizens, only 30 result in arrests. Of the 30 arrests, only 20 are prosecuted. Of the 20 prosecuted, only 15 suspects are convicted. Of the 15 convicted, only five are sentenced to prison time of more than one year. And of the five, not even one serves out the full length of his or her sentence.” (“What about the rights of crime victims,” Herald Times Reporter, Sept. 29, 1999, p. A4.)

And what is the fate, the average sentence, for the tiny fraction of violent felons who are imprisoned? Writes Dilulio: “Truth-in-sentencing laws pushed the average time served by released prisoners convicted of murder, rape, robbery, and aggravated assault from 43 months in 1993 to 49 months in 1997.For all types of prisoners, the average time served increased from 22 months in 1990 to 23 months in 1996. (“Against Mandatory Minimums,” p. 49.)

And murder alone: “It is undisputed that we extend extraordinary generosity to murderers. According to the National Center For Policy Analysis, the average sentence for murder and nonnegligent manslaughter is less than six years.” (Paul G. Cassell, The Wall Street Journal, June 16, 2000, p. A14) He obviously means the average time-served in prison.

And Joseph Perkins: “Indeed, according to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, the average sentence for murder is only 15 years. The average time served for taking an innocent life is a mere 5 1/2 years. (“Do murderers get off lightly,” Herald Times Reporter,” Sept. 15, 2000, p. A4) Fortunately, a large number and perhaps a majority of those killed are hardly “innocent” but rather criminals themselves. Certainly a majority in the “inner-cities” and a few “suburbs” of large metropolitan areas.

And Mary Letourneau was enslaved for 8-years, far longer than the average time-served for murder and roughly twice as long as the average time-served for all violent crimes! And Abigail Simon was sentenced to 8-25 years in prison and could have been sentenced to 25-years to life! And Kathryn Ronk was sentenced to 6-15 years in prison! And Cassandra Sorenson-Grohall was sentenced to 4-years in prison for having sex with a criminal who sexually harassed, molested, and raped her!

To call all of this insane is an understatement. It’s beyond insanity.

 

Melissa Bittner’s “Victim” was Charged with Murder: Outcome and Facts Unknown

20 Wednesday Jul 2016

Posted by Michael Kuehl in Melissa Bittner, Uncategorized, women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters", women as rapists, women sex offenders

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

media sex hysteria, Melissa Bittner, sex offenders, women as rapists, women sex offenders

Unsurprisingly, my characterization of Melissa’s “victim” -the 16-year-old biological man and criminal who sexually assaulted her- as violent was prescient. Almost surely, he committed acts of violence and other crimes before preying on and assaulting Melissa. In July of 2007, a young woman emailed the website moraloutrage.net., for which I was a leading contributor. She wanted to contact me and tell me about her case. The email was forwarded to me with a story like that of Melissa’s. It also included this news about Melissa’s “victim”: “I actually talked to Melissa Bittner the other day. I found her number and called her. Did you know that her ‘victim’ has since been charged with murder? Do you know what his defense is? The now-corpse tried to sexually assault him. Unbelievable.”

Since Melissa refused to talk to this woman again -she didn’t answer her calls or call her when she saw her messages- I don’t know if his victim was male or female. And if convicted, the length and nature of his sentence. Nor any other details.

I assume the victim was female, far more likely than not. And if so, did he also rape or try to rape her? If he had been prosecuted, convicted, and imprisoned for sexually assaulting Melissa, and who knows how many other victims, students and teachers, the victim he murdered, if female, would surely be alive today. CSA victimology and its hysteria and delusions have many aleatoric and unforeseen consequences -unforeseen to those blinded and brainwashed by CSA victimology.

If Melissa had forcefully resisted his assaults -e.g., scratching his face, trying to knee him in the groin, etc.- he might have beat her savagely, or possibly even killed her.

(If, however, the person he killed was male and the act occurred in jail or prison, then he might be telling the truth about his victim trying to rape or sexually assault him.)

A Misogynist Lunatic, Almost Surely an MRA, Emotes

16 Saturday Jul 2016

Posted by Michael Kuehl in Abigail Simon, age of consent, CSA victimology, MRAs, "men's movement, Uncategorized, women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters", women as rapists, women sex offenders

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Abigail Simon, media sex hysteria, men's movement, MRAs, sex offenders, women as rapists, women sex offenders

Bob Pell rages:

FREE? Should get the full 25 years!

He’s omniscient, of course, just like all other hateful commenters, male and female, and is 100% certain she’s lying about everything. Yes, she deserves to be enslaved in a zoo like an animal for at least 25-years because she was convicted of falling in love with a biological man of 15 who loved her and whom she transported to sexual paradise in a country in which, during the 1990s, the decade when the U.S. started to “get tough on crime,” the average-time served for murder (including non-negligent manslaughter) was less than 6-years and the average time-served for all violent crimes (aggravated assault, violent/forcible rape, robbery, homicide) was approximately 4-years.

And one can assume that 90-95% of the males who were sentenced for these crimes were recidivists, most with histories of crime and violence beginning at age 13 or 14 or 15 who should have been buried in prison long before they committed their latest violent felonies. And it’s likely that such averages are even lower and more lenient today after nearly 8-years of rule by Obama and his criminal justice reforms. And since males commit 100% of rapes, 99% (?) of violent sexual assaults, and roughly 90% of nonsexual violent felonies, they’re overwhelmingly the beneficiaries of this systematic leniency.

But through “cherry-picking,” the logical fallacy of confirmation bias, MRAs contend that men are systemically crucified and women are systemically coddled by the criminal justice systems of all states and the federal government. Thus, surely, if Abigail Simon had a penis, she would have been sentenced to the maximum of 25-years to life and would serve at least a quarter of a century in prison just like all male teachers and other men convicted of first-degree criminal sexual conduct in Michigan. To this lunatic misogynist, as for all MRAs, she’s obviously a beneficiary of the putative “double standards” and preferential treatment for women, the “pussy pass,” absurdly decried and derided as “chivalry, that the soi-disant “men’s movement” or “men’s rights movement,” essentially the mirror-image of feminism and the “women’s movement,” denounces tirelessly, virulently, hysterically, psychotically,  highlighting cases which conform to their fantasies of ubiquitous “misandry” and anti-male “sexism” and discrimination, and denying and ignoring those which undermine and contravene this narrative of pervasive male victimization.

As feminism is the ideology of female victimization, so “masculism” is the ideology of male victimization. And biological men under age 18 who crave and enjoy sex with adult women, especially teachers, are symbols of male victimization, proof that women can “rape” men and boys, without having penises, in liaisons in which their victims eagerly consent to or initiate their phantasmal and theoretical victimization.

 

 

A Witch-Burner Emotes

12 Tuesday Jul 2016

Posted by Michael Kuehl in Abigail Simon, age of consent, CSA victimology, sex offender registry, statutory rape, Uncategorized, women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters", women as rapists, women sex offenders

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Abigail Simon, age of consent, media sex hysteria, sex offender registry, sex offenders, women as rapists, women sex offenders

Haida writes:

Abigail was probably the most transparent liar I have ever seen. She looks like a spoiled brat that is used to getting what she wants. The fact that she accused this dumb kid of controlling her, a grown ass woman is bloody laughable. She is gross. Normally I wouldn’t have wanted to see her go to prison, but after that arrogant show she put on for the court, I’m extremely happy she’s sitting in prison now. And I hope it doesn’t go well for her in there.

I know you won’t print this because you’re probably her crazy mom that supported your lying daughter through that trial. Perhaps if you would have told her no once in a while she wouldn’t have grown up to be a narcissistic lying piece of waste.

Dearest Haida,

Yes, I’m Abigail’s “crazy” mother. She’s the author of two books,”The Ideology and Politics of Rape and Child Sexual Abuse,” and “Women as ‘Rapists’ and ‘Pedophiles’: Why Mary Letourneau Served More Time in Prison than the Average Man Convicted of Murder,” neither of which was published, condemning me to a life of poverty. And she wrote these books and is writing posts and articles on this website in the guise of a man with the sobriquet of Michael Kuehl! Michael, yes, but “Kuehl,” a comparatively rare German surname. Given the choice of myriads of surnames, what are the odds she would choose “Kuehl” as a pseudonym?! Talk about “bloody laughable.”

Do you know Abigail and her mother intimately? If not, you must be omniscient, comparable to an all-seeing and all-knowing supranatural being. How else would you know that she was/is an indulgent parent who never said no and so turned her daughter into a “spoiled brat” and “narcissistic lying piece of waste.” (And why single out her mother, and call her “crazy.” I’m sure her father, sisters(?) and brother(?), relatives and friends, etc., also “support” her. Are they all “crazy”?)

Untold myriads of mothers support and love sons who are brutes and savages with histories of crime beginning at age 13 or 14 or 15 who’ve committed dozens of violent and other mala in se felonies, and do so repeatedly and unconditionally; mothers support and love sons who are guilty beyond any doubt of murders and mass-murders that involve kidnappings, home invasions. rape, gang-rape, torture, mutilations, etc., and hope they’re acquitted at trial of all charges so they’re free to commit further atrocities. Mothers support and love sons who are sadists, monsters, lunatics, imbeciles, degenerates, psychopaths. Have you ever called them “crazy,” even one even once, albeit most of them are “crazy” or, to be generous, pathetically and tragically misguided.

Abigail is a highly intelligent, sensitive, educated, and cultured woman who has never committed a violent or other malum in se crime in her life and never will and is not a “threat to society” or to anyone or even a danger to “reoffend” by having sex with another young man under statutory age; a first-offender who was sentenced to  8-25 years in prison and a lifetime of extra/post incarceration penalties for nonviolent and victimless and mala prohibita crimes that are legal acts in dozens of other nations, including European countries.

Whether she’s lying, telling the truth, or telling the truth about some things and lying about others, her sentence is an outrage and travesty, hideously draconian, insanely excessive, and completely gratuitous in preventing and deterring violent and other mala in se felonies. If she’s telling the truth in full or essentially, she was sentenced to 8-25 years in prison and a lifetime of draconian/Orwellian persecution because her “victim” was the aggressor in their sexual intrigue and forced himself on her.  If she’s lying, she was crucified and her life was destroyed for falling in love with a biological man of 15  who loved her and whom she transported to sexual paradise.

And her mother is “crazy” for supporting her!

if not “crazy,” she would have cheered for the prosecution in the hope that her daughter would be convicted on all counts and sentenced to at least 8-25 years in prison and a lifetime of sex-offender registration and electronic parole monitoring. And when she heard the “guilty” verdicts, she would have rejoiced, triumphantly, rather than cried in anguish. And at sentencing, if not crazy, she would have implored the judge to impose the maximum sentence of 25-years to life in prison. If not crazy, she’d be overjoyed that her daughter is enslaved in a zoo like an animal and will be abused and degraded for who knows how many more years and then subjected to a lifetime of quasi-totalitarian surveillance and persecution. She’d be overjoyed that her daughter has to wear an electronic ankle-tether or “bracelet” that she can never remove (by herself, of her own volition) under any circumstances, not when bathing, showering, shaving her legs, having sex, and which can only be removed (by others) when she dies. And that her daughter must register for life as a uniquely deviant and dangerous criminal, her name, mug-shot, and address on the internet, accessible to the public, until she passes from this world at age 77 or 84 or 96 or 102.

A dumb kid” -as if he were 9-years-old and retarded with no sexual compulsions, fantasies, impulses, desires, “kinks,” etc., rather than a 15-year-old biological man, a 6’3″, 220 lb. volcano and hurricane of testosterone at the acme of his erotic powers, 9-inches taller than Abigail and almost a 100 pounds heavier and surely 6-8 times stronger in the upper-body depending on his musculature and bone-density. Why would any “grown ass woman,” as you put it so elegantly, any tutor/teacher, or any little or normal size adult man, conceivably fear such a behemoth, whom I assume you know little or nothing about, or any  biological man under age 18 who is large and muscular and aggressive and often violent and dangerous or potentially so. How many woman teachers, and also male teachers, aren’t afraid of many students, especially young men ages 13-18.

Being omniscient, you know that Abigail is lying about everything. But you and many others, especially women paradoxically, not only know that he didn’t rape her but also seem to be implying that the fear of a “child” and “kid” under age 18 raping or molesting his teacher is absurd and groundless under any circumstances, or virtually any circumstances. Really? just ask all the women teachers, and female students, who’ve been harassed, molested, and raped by male students,especially in large cities, over the last 50 years, including Melissa Bittner and Cassandra Sorenson-Grohall.

Every year, in the real world as opposed to the fantasy world you and millions of other people inhabit, in the U.S. and all other nations and cultures worldwide, biological men ages 13-17 commit millions of rapes and gang-rapes and serious acts of molestation, as in Cologne and other cities in Germany and Sweden and other European countries, overwhelmingly of adult women and underage adolescent girls, including teachers and students, but also prebubertal girls, young men (usually those under age 18), and prepubertal boys. And also millions and millions of other violent and mala in se crimes.

If three “boys” ages 15 and 14 and 13 broke into your home and gang-raped you, penetrating and violating you anally and orally as well as vaginally, for 2-3 hours, I suppose you wouldn’t press charges since they were just “dumb kids” who didn’t know what they were doing and should be released and forgiven, free to rape more women and girls and commit other violent and serious crimes.

Because They’re Not “Pedophiles”

09 Saturday Apr 2016

Posted by Michael Kuehl in Abigail Simon, age of consent, CSA victimology, Uncategorized, women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters", women as rapists, women sex offenders

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Abigail Simon, age of consent, sex offenders, women as rapists, women sex offenders

And such women must be defined and vilified as “pedophiles” and “child molesters” precisely because they are not pedophiles and child molesters.A pedophile is a man (pubescent teenage males under age 18 as well as adult men age 18 and older, heterosexual or homosexual) with a sexual fixation on and obsession with prepubescent children, girls or boys. To quote wikipedia: “Pedophilia or paedophilia is a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children, generally age 11 or younger.”

The imaginary “victims” of these women are not prepubescent children, boys or girls, “generally age 11 or younger.” They are pubescent teenage males ages 13-17. Ergo, the women are not “pedophiles.” End of story. Case closed. Nor are they “child molesters,” since their “victims” are not children, biologically as opposed to legally, but men, exactly the same as adults in respect to sexuality: compulsions, desires, fantasies, obsessions, fetishes, disorders, perversions, the penetration and impregnation of adult women and underage adolescent girls, “sexual harassment,” molestation, rape and gang-rape.

Moreover, I would argue that few if any women (including pubescent teenagers under statutory age) “experience a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children, generally age 11 or younger.” I would argue that few if any females, adults or adolescents, who have “sexual contact” with prepubertal children, boys or girls, are pedophiles, certainly not in the sense that males are pedophiles. In fact, it’s debatable if a woman can  even be a pedophile under the APA definition.Ralph Underwager and Hollida Wakefield summarize this definition:

…The DSM-IV American Psychiatric Association (1994) defines pedophilia in terms of recurrent, intense sexually arousing fantasies, sexual urges, or behaviors involving sexual activity with a prepubescent child or children, and requires that the fantasies,urges, or behaviors cause clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning. It is therefore possible for an individual who meets these criteria to have never engaged in illegal sexual behaviors. At the same time, not all sex offenders against a minor (a prepubertal child, they should have written, M.K.) are pedophiles. All mental health professionals acting  in an expert witness capacity should know this distinction.(“Special Problems With Sexual Abuse Cases,” in Coping with Psychiatric and Psychological Testimony. Los Angeles: Law and Psychology Press, 1995, p. 1336.)

But, increasingly “pedophilia” is now defined, falsely and absurdly, as “sex between adults and children,”  including pubescent teenagers under age 18, and thus adults are defined and vilified as “pedophiles” for engaging in coitus or fellatio or “sexual contact” with biological men and women under age 18.

But to define an “adult” who turned 18 a week ago as a “pedophile” for having sex with a “child” who will turn 18 and thus be an “adult” in 13 days is so perverse and ludicrous that even CSA victimologists, the ideologues and fanatics culpable for the bogus and malign usage of this aspersive and incendiary term, are constrained to offer exceptions and qualifications, themselves arbitrary and irrational. Thus, according to the “experts,” an adult must be 4-5 years older than a “child” to be branded as a “pedophile.”

So under this false and absurd definition of “pedophile” and the arbitrary and ridiculous age-disparity of 4-5 years between the “victim” and adult perpetrator, an 18-year-old adult female who has sex with a biological of 15 is not a “pedophile” if the magical age-disparity is 4-years but a 19-year-old female who has sex with the same 15-year-old is a “pedophile.” And a 20-year-old female who has sex with a biological man of 15 is a “pedophile” is the magical age-disparity is 5-years but a 19-year-old female who has sex with the same 15-year-old is not a “pedophile.”

tAs noted, adult women of any age who have sex with pubescent teenagers, males or females, are not pedophiles, but adolescent males can be pedophiles. So a 23-year-old woman teacher is vilified as a “pedophile” for having a love affair or tryst or engaging in a single act of “sexual contact” with a biological man of 15 or 16 who might be a true pedophile with an exclusive or primary attraction to prepubescent children.

 

 

Lunatic Extremes: Crucifyng the Benign and Coddling the Barbaric

27 Saturday Feb 2016

Posted by Michael Kuehl in Abigail Simon, CSA victimology, sex offender registry, Uncategorized, women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters", women as rapists, women sex offenders

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Abigail Simon, age of consent, sex offender registry, sex offenders, women as rapists, women sex offenders

From the Daily Caller:

An 18-year-old Somali immigrant to Sweden who violently raped a 12-year-old has been punished with a mere 180 hours of community service. (“Immigrant to Sweden Rapes 12-year-old Girl, Gets Community Service, ” by Blake Neff, June 3, 2015.)

Need one say anything?! A Somali immigrant who violently rapes a 12-year-old girl, almost surely prepubescent, is sentenced to 180 hours of community service (6 hours a day for 30 days or 3 hours a day for 60 days and what kind of “community service”?), and Abigail Simon was sentenced to 8-25 years in prison and a lifetime of draconian/Orwellian persecution for allegedly engaging in consensual sex with a biological man of 15 whom she claims was the aggressor in their sexual intrigue and forced himself on her.

In a sane world, one should say a sane “First-World,” the violent Somali rapist (doubtless a recidivist with a history of violence and criminality, sexual and nonsexual, probably in Sweden, if an alien for even a few months, and certainly in his native Somalia, beginning at age 12 or 13 or 14) would have been sentenced to 8-25 years in prison or 25-years to life or, better still, deported and sent back to the hell of Somalia, never to return to Sweden or the U.S. or any other “First-World” nation, and Abigail would have been charged with a misdemeanor and, if convicted, sentenced to 3-6 months of probation, and possibly 100-200  hours of community service. Or, better still, she would not have been charged with any crimes but punished, non-criminally, by dismissal and revocation of her licence and expulsion from the profession. And that’s assuming she’s lying and is “guilty” of the monstrous and inexpiable crime of transporting a biological man of 15 to sexual paradise..

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Subscribe

  • Entries (RSS)
  • Comments (RSS)

Archives

  • October 2025
  • April 2024
  • February 2024
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • December 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • April 2022
  • November 2021
  • July 2021
  • May 2021
  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • July 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • January 2020
  • July 2019
  • November 2018
  • September 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016

Categories

  • "anarcho-tyranny"
  • "sex-offender treatment"
  • "traumatization"
  • Abigail Simon
  • Abigail Simon sentence
  • age of consent
  • appeal
  • Barton Dieters
  • Cassandra
  • Cassandra Sorenson-Grohall
  • criminal sentences
  • CSA victimology
  • Debra Lafave
  • feminism
  • innate sex differences, embodiment, maleness and femaleness
  • Jeffrey Epstein
  • John Derbyshire, Debra Lafave
  • Kathryn Ronk
  • lawsuit
  • Mary Letourneau
  • media coverage, sensationalism
  • Melissa Bittner
  • Melisssa Bittner
  • MRAs, "men's movement
  • plea-bargain
  • prison security levels
  • prisoner rights, mail, censorship
  • sex offender registry
  • statutory rape
  • Uncategorized
  • Willie Horton
  • women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters"
  • women as rapists
  • women sex offenders

Meta

  • Create account
  • Log in

  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • freeabigailsimon
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • freeabigailsimon
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar