Tag Archives: MRAs

Recidivism Rates of Sex Offenders: Violent Rapists and Pedophiles vs. Women who have Sex with Biological Men under Statutory Age

01 Sunday Apr 2018

Posted by in "anarcho-tyranny", Abigail Simon, Abigail Simon sentence, age of consent, criminal sentences, CSA victimology, innate sex differences, embodiment, maleness and femaleness, MRAs, "men's movement, sex offender registry, statutory rape, Uncategorized, women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters", women as rapists, women sex offenders

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , , ,

CSA victimologists argue that sex-offenders, all  sex-offenders, not only violent rapists and pedophiles but also adults who engage in consensual sex-acts with pubescent teenagers under statutory age, have greater rates of recidivism than other categories of convicted felons and, consequently, must be forced to register as uniquely deviant and dangerous criminals.

NARSOL (formerly RSOL) has many articles confuting, persuasively, the contention that sex-offenders are more likely to re-offend than other classes of offenders, even recidivist criminals who’ve committed dozens of violent and other mala in se crimes but have never been convicted of a sexual offense.

Moreover, the recidivism rates of sex-offenders in general are profoundly misleading in that the overwhelming majority of males who commit violent/forcible rapes and gang-rapes, and virtually all of those who commit street/stranger rapes (e.g., who rape and gang-rape women in parks or break into homes and rape and gang-rape women, crimes which often involve murder and/or aggravated assault), are low IQ recidivist criminals who also commit other violent and mala in se crimes. This reality induces all kinds of confusion and can be easily manipulated, statistically, to foster the myth that sex-offenders in general are more likely to re-offend than other categories of offenders.

But even if one assumes, purely for the sake of argument, that NARSOL and other critics are wrong and that sex-offenders as a group do have higher rates of recidivism than other categories of felons, what’s true of sex offenders as a group does not apply to adults, first-offenders with no prior criminal records, who have consensual sex with pubescent teenagers under age 16 or 17 or 18, depending on the age of consent in each state, and especially to women who have sex with young men under statutory age.

It’s likely that not one woman teacher who had sex with a male student age 13-17 (and its now a felony in most states for teachers to have consensual sex with 18-year-old students) has ‘re-offended” by having sex with another young man under statutory age. If so, their recidivism rate is ZERO. And even if one or two of them have “re-offended,” i.e.,transporting another biological man under under statutory age to carnal elysium, which I doubt, their recidivism rate is far less than one percent or almost ZERO.

Males who commit violent/forcible rapes, overwhelmingly low-IQ stereotypical criminals (including biological men under age 18 who are absurdly defined as “children”), are driven by a propensity for violence and predation that is insoluble and difficult to control. This explains why they are likely to re-offend by committing not only rapes and gang-rapes but also aggravated assaults, muggings, armed robberies, burglaries, gang-shootings, murders, attempted murders, home invasions, etc.

True pedophiles convicted of raping and/or molesting prepubescent children, i.e., biological men (including those under age 18 who are defined as “children”) with a sexual fixation on and obsession with prepubescent children, are driven by a fetish and “paraphilia” that is incurable and often difficult to control, Ergo, they’re a risk to re-offend.

Adult females who have sex with young men under the age of 16 or 17 or 18 are not driven by a propensity for violence or a fetish or “paraphilia” that is insoluble and difficult to control. And that explains why it’s likely that not a single woman teacher who had sex with a male student has “re-offended” by having sex with another biological man under statutory age. That explains why their recidivism rate is likely ZERO and surely far less than ONE PERCENT. The reason for this is that they were attracted to and had sex with young men under age 18 for the same reason they’re attracted to and have had sex with adult men in their 20s and 30s and 40s and beyond.

But to CSA victimologists, virtually all of whom are feminists and left-liberals, and to MRAs, the misogynist crazies and vermin of the soi-disant “men’s movement,” and the millions and millions of men and women they’re browbeat and brainwashed, adult females who have consensual sex with young men under statutory age are tantamount or comparable to men (including underage adolescents) who commit violent/forcible rapes and to pedophiles who rape and molest prepubescent boys and girls, and thus are defined and vilified as “rapists” and “pedophiles” and “child molesters” who must register for life or at least 20-30 years as uniquely deviant and dangerous criminals who are more likely to re-offend than criminals who are actually violent and seriously dangerous, including stereotypical and recidivist males who’ve committed dozens of violent and other mala in se crimes but who’ve never been convicted of a sexual offense albeit most of them have raped and/or gang-raped men in jails and prisons and/or women and adolescent girls.

Thus Abigail Simon must not only register for life as a uniquely dangerous and degenerate criminal, her name, mug-shot, and address on the internet for all to see along with myriads of other men and women who are not violent and dangerous, unlike legions of true criminals, nor even a “danger to re-offend” by having sex with another teenager under statutory age. She must also wear an electronic ankle-tether/”bracelet” she can never remove until she dies at age 77 or 84 or 96 or whenever -albeit she has never committed a violent or other mala in se crime in her life and never will and is not a “threat to society” or to anyone nor even a “danger” to “re-offend” by having sex with another biological man under statutory age.

To repeat: decrying this as “insane” is an understatement. It’s beyond insanity.

 

Why the Sexes don’t Understand Each Other, and How this Relates to Women having Sex with Young Men under Statutory Age

11 Thursday Jan 2018

Posted by in Abigail Simon sentence, age of consent, criminal sentences, CSA victimology, innate sex differences, embodiment, maleness and femaleness, MRAs, "men's movement, Uncategorized, women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters", women as rapists, women sex offenders

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , ,

The fundamental reason men and women don’t understand each other is because they have different bodies. The only way men could understand female sexuality, comprehend it fully as lived experience, is if they had female bodies. The only way that men could understand what it’s like to be a woman in respect to pregnancy, sexuality, hormones, menstruation, etc. is if they were female.

The only way that women could understand male sexuality, especially that of young males in their 20s and teens, comprehend it fully as lived experience, is if they had penises and male levels of testosterone, which would make them male rather than female.

With the exception of “men’s rights activists” -pathological and vehement misogynists and thus the loudest and craziest voices in demonizing and vilifying women as “rapists” and “pedophiles” for transporting biological men under age 18 to sexual paradise in factually consensual relationships0- women in general are more punitive and hysterical than men over affairs and trysts in which the “victims” almost always enjoy the sex far more than the women who “rape” and “molest” them and are often if not usually the aggressors and initiators of their phantasmal and theoretical “victimization.”

The reason for this is not only that women as a group are more vitiated by feminist and CSA victimology propaganda and inculcation, but also because women don’t understand male sexuality, especially that of males in their 20’s and teens, including young men under age 18 who consent to or initiate sex with adult women. Their corruption by feminism and obsession with equality as sameness explains, paradoxically, why many if not most women, at least among educated women, are more angry over adult females, especially teachers in positions of authority, having sex with young men under statutory age than they are with adult men and even male teachers having sex with underage adolescent girls, and more punitive in their calls for retribution.

In respect to sex between adults and underage adolescents, this ignorance of male sexuality also explains why women in general are less likely to criticize and oppose and more likely to support the insanely and uniquely draconian/Orwellian laws and punishments, grotesque and gratuitous, “cruel and unusual,” imposed on adults who are at least 4-5 years older than their de jure “victims,” especially as they relate to women having sex with young men under statutory age.

It explains why women are more likely than men (save MRA’s and the likes of Barton Dieters) to view the young men as “victims” of “rape” and CSA who’ll be “traumatized and scarred for life” and the women as “rapists” and “pedophiles” who deserve to be sentenced to years or even decades in prison and subjected to mandatory “sex-offender treatment,” quasi-totalitarian post-incarceration supervision, electronic parole-monitoring with an ankle-tether/”bracelet,” possibly for life as with Abigail Simon, and a lifetime or at least 20-30 years of public registration on the internet as uniquely dangerous and degenerate criminals, unlike myriads of low-IQ brutes and savages who’ve committed dozens and scores of violent and other mala in se crimes but have never been convicted of a sexual offense albeit most of them have raped or gang-raped men in jails and prisons and/or women  and adolescent girls. Because of the media, primarily, untold millions of women hate Mary Letourneau, Debra Lafave, and Abigail Simon more than all these low-IQ brutes and savages put together. whose crimes the media ignores and suppresses, with some exceptions.

 

 

Beyond Insanity: Woman teacher sentenced to 40-Years in prison for having sex with 14-year-old male student

29 Wednesday Nov 2017

Posted by in "anarcho-tyranny", age of consent, criminal sentences, CSA victimology, MRAs, "men's movement, plea-bargain, statutory rape, Uncategorized, women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters", women as rapists, women sex offenders

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

, , , , ,

From news.com (8/16/2013):

Teacher jailed for 40-years for sex with student age 14. From Daily Mail, 2-18- Shannon Alicia Schmieder, 39, will have to serve 20 years in the toughest sentence ever handed out by a U.S. court to a teacher accused of underage sex, The Daily Mail reported (February 18, 2012).

And from human-stupidity.com (8/16/13):

Female teacher Shannon Alicia Schmieder, in Coweta, Georgia received a 40-year jail sentence for sex with a 14-year-old boy. This fills some men’s rights proponents with glee: finally a woman gets a taste of the bitter “age of consent” medicine concocted by feminists and religious zealots: the same high jail terms men routinely get sentenced to. Making love carries the same prison term as murder or manslaughter.

Actually, her 40-year prison (not jail) sentence “fills” nearly all MRAs with “glee.” And her sentence, if she serves the full 40-years, is roughly 7-times more severe than the average-time served for murder, and almost 4-times more severe if she’s paroled after “only” 20-years. 40-years in prison, under a plea-bargain, apparently, and she won’t be eligible for parole until she’s been enslaved and abused and degraded for 20 years in a chthonic Georgia prison -at least 20-years if not longer in a country in which, during the 1990’s, the decade in which the U.S. began to “get tough on crime,” the average time-served for murder was less than 6-years and the average time-served for all violent felonies (aggravated assault, robbery, rape, and homicide) was approximately 4-years! And one can be sure that over-90% of these felonies, among the male offenders, were committed by recidivists, most of whom should have been in prison rather than free to commit more violent felonies. And given their crime rates in relation to those of females, males are the beneficiaries, overwhelmingly, of this systemic leniency.

So it’s not true that adult men, including violent and/or recidivist criminals, are “routinely” sentenced to 40-years in prison for having sex with pubescent teenagers under statutory age. I doubt if the average sentence for all adult men, including those with prior criminal records, is even 4-5 years. It’s true that male teachers are often sentenced to 10-20 years in prison for having love affairs and mere trysts with underage female and male adolescents in a country in which violent and/or recidivist male criminals are routinely and systematically coddled.

But rather than decry and oppose the hideously draconian prison sentences often inflicted on male teachers and the draconian/Orwellian post-incarceration punishments inflicted on all male teachers -virtually all of whom are first-offenders convicted of nonviolent and usually victimless and mala prohibita felonies that are often legal acts (or perhaps misdemeanors) in dozens of other nations, including European countries, men who’ve never committed a violent or other mala in se crime in their lives and almost surely never will and are not a “threat to society” or to anyone nor usually even a danger to re-offend by having sex with another underage teenager- MRAs demand that the lives of women be destroyed by the same hideously draconian/Orwellian punishments.

So pathological and virulent and obsessive is their hatred of women and lust for vengeance -against not only those they revile and asperse as “feminazis” but women in general and white females in particular, usually because of the actions of one or a few women in their personal lives, nearly always ex-wives, and/or sexual frustration- that they’re willing to destroy the lives of myriads of men who are not violent or dangerous in order to destroy the lives of a much smaller number of women who transport biological men under statutory age to carnal Elysium.

And with a distinctly venomous fixation on and obsession with notorious “rapists” and “pedophiles” like Mary Letourneau, Debra Lafave, and other teachers who, in contrast to men in the inverted fantasy world these deranged misogynists inhabit, nearly always receive “a slap on the wrist” and little or no serious punishment.

Consummate and tireless practitioners of the logical fallacy of confirmation bias, “masculinists” cherry-pick cases in which men are sentenced to 20-30 years in prison for having sex with underage adolescents, males and females, and contrast them with cases of women who receive probation or “only” 6-12 months in jail or “only” 1 or 2 years in prison, thus advancing the lie and canard that men are nearly always sentenced to 20 or 30 years in prison while women are nearly always sentenced to probation or a few months in jails that are benign and liveable compared to male prisons and the male housing units of jails -not because male inmates, generally, are far more violent, brutal, vicious, sadistic, predatory, etc., but because of “misandry” and anti-male “sexism” and discrimination. Men are crucified, almost invariably, their lives destroyed, while female “rapists,” “predators,” “child molesters,” and “pedophiles” are shockingly and scandalously indulged, almost invariably, walking away with a “slap-on-the-wrist.”

Tell that to Shannon Schmieder, Michelle Taylor, Abigail Simon, Kathryn Ronk, Mary Letourneau, Cassandra Sorenson-Grohall, Melissa Bittner (a transparently innocent women who was sentenced to a year in prison for “sexual assaults” that were committed against her by her “victim,” a 16-year-old criminal who was charged with murder shortly thereafter), Pamela Rogers. and many other women who are punished more or even far more severely than myriads of violent male criminals, usually recidivists, who commit aggravated assaults, muggings, armed robberies, gang-shootings, home invasions, rape, gang-rapes, and murders.

And even those who are sentenced to probation or “only” 6-12 months in hellish jails are actually sentenced to a lifetime or at at least 20-30 years of draconian/Orwellian persecution, including public registration (their names, mug-shots, and addresses on the internet for all to see and what that entails in regard to danger and mortification) as uniquely dangerous and degenerate criminals, unlike myriads of male brutes and savages with histories of crime and violence beginning at age 13 or 14 who’ve committed dozens and scores of violent and other mala in se crimes  but have never been convicted of a sexual offense albeit most of them have committed rapes and/or gang-rapes either of men in jails and prisons and/or of women and adolescent girls in the free world.

Even Debra Lafave, one of few women, and perhaps the only female, to receive probation with no jail time since the Letourneau hysteria of 1997, was punished more severely in many ways than violent and/or recidivist male criminals who’ve never been convicted of a sexual offense: 3-years of house-arrest (prohibited from leaving her mother’s house while not working), 7-years of parole, at least 10 years of electronic parole-monitoring with an ankle-tether/”bracelet” she could never remove; restrictions of her freedoms and intrusions into her private life that don’t apply to violent and/or recidivist male criminals who’ve never been convicted of a sexual offense (she was arrested and jailed and could have been sentenced to 15-years in prison for talking to a 17-year-old female co-worker about non-work related matters at a fast-food restaurant); and a life-sentence of public sex-offender registration.

Yes, all this was/is a “slap on the wrist” for the vile and heinous crime of engaging in a few acts of coitus and fellatio with a young man under statutory age, consensual sex the memories of which the de jure “victim” will forever cherish. And this was defined as “rape” and Debra as a “rapist” and the young man as a “victim” who is “traumatized” and “scarred for life” by having sex with a gorgeous and ravishing 23-year-old woman. The only suffering and “trauma” he endured was a result of the law and criminal justice system, and the media and its histrionic and sensationalist coverage, not only local and state but also national and even international, turning Debra into the most infamous and despised woman sex criminal since Mary Letourneau.

 

 

The Distinctly Odious Barton Deiters

21 Saturday Oct 2017

Posted by in "traumatization", Abigail Simon, Abigail Simon sentence, appeal, Barton Dieters, CSA victimology, MRAs, "men's movement, Uncategorized, women as rapists

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

, , , , ,

As noted in previous articles/blog-posts: when covering the arrest, prosecution, trial, conviction, sentencing, imprisonment, and appeals in this case, Barton Dieters has often been less a reporter than a myrmidon of and cheerleader for the prosecution, and later for the judge who twice upheld Abigail’s prison sentence of 8-25 years and life-sentence of electronic parole-monitoring with an ankle-tether/”bracelet” she can never remove

For example, a reporter who uses the phrase “ex-tutor guilty of raping her student” is not a true journalist, objective and neutral, but an activist and CSA victimologist, who is using language not to describe but rather to distort and pervert objective reality for ideological and propagandistic easons. Not having penises, women can’t commit rape in the pure and literal sense of the word. And Abigail wasn’t guilty of “rape” even if defined as violent sexual assault. If anyone was a victim of rape in this liaison, it was Abigail if she’s telling the truth about her de jure “victim” forcing himself on her.

And his tendentiousness was blatant in using words and phrases like “dispatched” and “shot down” in covering the judge’s decisions and arguments at her re-sentencing. “Dispatch” means “to kill with quick efficiency; to dispose of something rapidly or efficiently”; to “defeat.” “Shoot down” means to “kill, defeat, discredit.” And a synonym of “shoot down” is “skewer,” which means to “criticize or ridicule sharply and effectively.” So, according to Dieters, the judge killed Tieber’s arguments, metaphorically, with rapidity and efficiency. He defeated, discredited, and skewered them.

Writing that the judge “rejected” Tieber’s arguments would have been true journalism, neutral and objective, an exemplar of simply reporting the facts rather than siding with the judge, indeed hailing the judge’s decision by using words and phrases like “dispatched” and “shot down,” and against Tieber.

His use of such words not only implies but asserts that Tieber was wrong in claiming that Abigail was not a threat to “re-offend” and in arguing that a life-sentence of electronic parole-monitoring with a ankle-tether/”bracelet” was “cruel and unusual punishment,” and that the judge was right in upholding her 8-25 year prison sentence and life-sentence of electronic parole-monitoring.

The use of words and phrases like “dispatched” and “shot down” not only asserts that Tieber’s arguments were wrong and demonstrably false, contrary to facts and logic and reason, but also ridiculous, irrational, delusional.

Imagine the outrage and hysteria if he had sided with Tieber and against the judge by asserting that Tieber was right and the judge was wrong and used words to praise Tieber and belittle and asperse the judge.

As a CSA victimologist, he obviously thinks of her as a “rapist” and “child molester,” perhaps even a “pedophile,” and the biological man who assented to or initiated sex with her as a “child” and “victim” of “rape” and CSA who’ll be “traumatized” and “scarred for life,” whatever the facts and circumstances, even if he raped her, as did the “victim” of Cassandra Sorenson-Grohall, and she then assented to sex as did Cassandra.

And he obviously believes she deserves to be enslaved and abused and degraded in prison for at least 8-years if not longer and then subjected to a lifetime of draconian/Orwellian persecution, for a “crime” in which the “victim” enjoys the sex more than the woman who “raped” and “molested” him and is often if not usually the aggressor and initiator of his phantasmal and theoretical “victimization.”

The description of Abigail’s lover and other young men who consent to or initiate sex with adult women as “victims” is not an objective fact but an ideological dogma and legal classification. Journalists and reporters and others who use the term “victim” without quotation marks are legitimizing this dogma and legal classification rather than describing objective reality. They’re reifying a dogma and theory for which there is no objective evidence and empirical substantiation.

To those of us who aren’t MRAs and/or CSA victimologists, or brainwashed and vitiated by same, precisely the opposite is palpably true: the judge was wrong and Tieber was right. The judge’s arguments -what he now believes given his “reeducation” or affects to believe given his fear of  MRAs and CSA victimologists-  were not only false but ridiculous, based on lies and/or delusions.

To those of us who are honest, realistic, objective, and rational on this matter, Tieber was right in arguing that Abigail is not a “threat to society” or to anyone nor even a danger to “re-offend” by having sex with another young man under statutory age, and thus her sentence of 8-25 years in prison was grossly and absurdly excessive and iniquitous, and her life-sentence of electronic parole monitoring with an ankle-tether she can never remove was “cruel and unusual punishment,” not only in the sense of being cruel, obviously, but also wholly gratuitous, completely unnecessary in that Abigail has never committed a violent or other mala in se crime in her life and never will or is not a “threat to society” or to anyone nor even a “danger to re-offend” by having sex with another young man under statutory age.

But why, seemingly, does he hate her more than most true sex criminals, at least those who are black, Muslim, and “Hispanic”/”Latino”: e.g., males (including biological men under age 18 who are absurdly defined as “children”) who commit violent/forcible rapes and gang-rapes of adult females and underage adolescent girls, most heinously those who use knives and guns and terrorize and brutalize and gravely injure their victims; or men (including underage pubescent teenagers) who rape or prey on and molest prepubertal children.

And does he hate the low IQ brutes and savages who, each year in Detroit alone, commit hundreds of rapes and murders and thousands of other violent and mala in se crimes, and have done so for decades, destroying a city that was once extolled as the “Paris of the West”? Of course not, not as a group or as individuals. Like all leftists, I’m sure he views most of them with empathy and compassion, as “victims” of “racism” and the “legacy of slavery and segregation.” And the hysteria over Abigail’s intrigue with a young man of 15 distracts from the anarchy and mayhem and warfare in Detroit and, to a lesser degree, Flint and Grand Rapids.

One senses that his hatred of Abigail is, in some ways and to some degree, whatever the reasons, deeply personal. One would think he was the “victim’s father,” or a relative. Or that the “victim’s” parents were his friends and/or neighbors, whom he knows intimately.

He appears to revel in her anguish and degradation, pain and suffering. I’m sure he was happy to see her in handcuffs attached to a waist-chain and leg-irons for well over 2-hours at her sentencing, so enervated by fear and angst and despair and lack of sleep that she could barely walk or even stand and almost collapsed twice and often crying. I’m sure he hopes her life in prison is hellish, abusive, degrading, and nightmarish, the more so the better. Thanks to the media, led by him, she’s surely the most infamous, and probably the most hated, of all 2000-plus inmates. He might even be glad to hear that she was assaulted, brutally and viciously, or even murdered.

 

More on Traumatization

26 Wednesday Apr 2017

Posted by in "sex-offender treatment", "traumatization", age of consent, MRAs, "men's movement, Uncategorized, women as rapists, women sex offenders

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, ,

“Trauma” defined: “a mental condition caused by severe shock, especially when the harmful effects last for a long time.” (Oxford learners dictionaries); “a deeply distressing or disturbing experience.” (Oxford dictionaries); “a very difficult or unpleasant experience that causes someone to have mental or emotional problems usually for a long time”; “a disordered psychic or behavioral state resulting from severe mental or emotional stress….(Merriam-Webster)

The above, according to the “conventional wisdom,” defines the varied experiences, the emotions, the psychic states of and effects on young men under age 16 or even 18 who have sex with adult females who are at least 4-5 years older. Invariably so, according to the dogmas of CSA victimologists, irrespective of the facts and circumstances: whether the women seduced them or they were the aggressors and initiators or their liaisons could be defined as a mutual coming together, or whether they had sex dozens of times over a period of months or engaged in a single act of coitus or fellatio or “sexual contact,” and so forth.

In nearly all instances, in reality and fact as opposed to theory and fantasy, the experiences of young men under age 18 who have sex with adult women are the antithesis of traumatization.

Generally, in reality and fact as opposed to theory and fantasy, if one is traumatized by one or a few or many experience(s), one feels the trauma, immediately and profoundly, viscerally and unequivocally, and knows one is traumatized. One isn’t traumatized if one isn’t aware of being traumatized. If there is any doubt as to whether one was traumatized, then one wasn’t traumatized.

If one is traumatized, deeply and genuinely, by one or a few or many experiences, one doesn’t need to be subjected, willingly or compulsorily, to hours and days and weeks and months and years of psycho-therapy to make one realize that one was traumatized, unconsciously, by an act or acts that one experienced, consciously, as supremely pleasurable, and remembers fondly as gratifying, exciting, fulfilling, empowering.

Unless they’re insane and/or masochistic, people don’t assent to or initiate acts that they know will be traumatizing. And, even more so, they don’t continue to assent to or initiate acts which they experienced as traumatizing.

In regard to instances in which adult women try to seduce or initiate sex with young men under statutory age: If biological men under age 18 don’t want to have sex with adult females for whatever reasons -because they’re in love with girls their own age and don’t want to betray them; because they’re “players” and “super-studs” who’ve had sex many times before and only have sex with females who are at least an “8” and the woman who wants to have sex with them is only a “6′ or at best a “7”; because they were raised to believe that sex outside of marriage is “sinful” and immoral by fundamentalist-evangelical Christian parents; because they’re homosexual, etc.- all they have to do is say “no,” rudely or politely, brusquely or apologetically, to repel their advances and importunities.

Once again, we see how CSA victimologists and those they’ve indoctrinated, most perniciously the ruling-elites and governing-classes,  conflate biological men under age 16 or even 18 with prepubescent girls of 10 and 11. Just as the latter are too young and sexless and innocent to say “no” and resist the sexual aggressions of adult men 18-years of age and older and pubescent teenage males under age 18, so the former are too young and immature to say “no” and repel the advances of women who are nearly always smaller and weaker and usually far smaller and weaker than their putative “victims,” and will not resort to violence/force or overt threats of same (physical assaults and/or weapons) if rebuffed since they’re not violent and deranged and psychopathic -and even if they were violent, they too small and weak to compel the submission of young men under age 16 or 18 who are larger and stronger.

And how many times, in all of history, has a women used a knife or gun to terrorize a young man under statutory age (or of any age from 18 to 80) into submitting to coitus or other sex-acts “against his will”?  At worst, such crimes are so rare as to be negligible, statistically, and virtually nonexistent in contrast to the known and told and unknown and untold millions and millions of rapes and gang-rapes and sexual assaults that adult men and underage teenage males have committed against adult women and underage teenage and prepubescent girls and boys. And also, appallingly, the myriads if not millions of male-on-male rapes and gang-rapes and sexual assaults, predominantly in jails and prisons and detention camps.

Thus, in the minds of CSA victimologists (and also MRAs, for divergent reasons and motives), they have no choice but to engage in sex-acts that will “traumatize,” “devastate,” and “scar” them for life: even if they’ve had sex before, often many times before, with underage adolescent girls, and/or outweigh the women who “rape” them by 50-100 lbs. and are 4-6 times stronger in the upper body. But they’re not too young and immature to be charged with felonies and possibly “waived” into adult court if they rape adult females and underage adolescent girls.

The reason why few biological men under statutory age will reject the advances of adult females is because they want to have sex with them, just as they want to have sex with underage adolescent girls, and know the sex with be pleasurable.

If biological men under age 18 have had sex once or a few or many times with adolescent girls under age 18, then they know that acts of coitus and fellatio with adult women, teachers or whoever, will be just as if not even more exciting and gratifying and empowering, physically and psychologically, depending on the circumstances: e.g., the milieu in which they “make love,” the expertise of the woman in the fine arts of love-making, the attractiveness and desirability of the woman, etc.

If they’re virgins and have never had sex with a female, they’ve surely masturbated, most weekly, many daily, and experienced their orgasms as pleasurable: the tickle, the tingle, the sting, and the spit, and then deep relaxation, the joys of onanism. So even if they’re virgins, they know that that sliding or jamming their penises into the vagina of an adult women and ejaculating inside her will be even more gratifying, physically and psychologically, than self-pleasuring by hand in a bedroom or bathroom or wherever in onanistic solitude,  vitiated by anxiety if their parents are home and nearby or if in a public restroom. Or so, too, with her warm, wet lips and tongue fellating him to orgasmic ecstasy.

Ironically, the hysterical and dogmatic fantasy and insistence of the modern anti-sex feminist left that young men under age 16 or even 18 who eagerly assent to or initiate sex with adult women at least 4-5 years older will be “traumatized” and “scarred for life” is comparable to the hysterical and dogmatic fantasy and insistence of anti-sex Christian puritans that young men who masturbated would “go insane” before they were sentenced to hell for eternity. if they didn’t believe that Jesus was the son of God who was born of a virgin and resurrected the moment he died on the cross. If they did so believe, they would still have “gone insane” from onanism but would have ascended to Heaven after death to enjoy an eternity of bliss as an immortal soul and disembodied mind who can’t have sex with other souls or masturbate.

A Misogynist Lunatic, Almost Surely an MRA, Emotes

16 Saturday Jul 2016

Posted by in Abigail Simon, age of consent, CSA victimology, MRAs, "men's movement, Uncategorized, women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters", women as rapists, women sex offenders

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , ,

Bob Pell rages:

FREE? Should get the full 25 years!

He’s omniscient, of course, just like all other hateful commenters, male and female, and is 100% certain she’s lying about everything. Yes, she deserves to be enslaved in a zoo like an animal for at least 25-years because she was convicted of falling in love with a biological man of 15 who loved her and whom she transported to sexual paradise in a country in which, during the 1990s, the decade when the U.S. started to “get tough on crime,” the average-time served for murder (including non-negligent manslaughter) was less than 6-years and the average time-served for all violent crimes (aggravated assault, violent/forcible rape, robbery, homicide) was approximately 4-years.

And one can assume that 90-95% of the males who were sentenced for these crimes were recidivists, most with histories of crime and violence beginning at age 13 or 14 or 15 who should have been buried in prison long before they committed their latest violent felonies. And it’s likely that such averages are even lower and more lenient today after nearly 8-years of rule by Obama and his criminal justice reforms. And since males commit 100% of rapes, 99% (?) of violent sexual assaults, and roughly 90% of nonsexual violent felonies, they’re overwhelmingly the beneficiaries of this systematic leniency.

But through “cherry-picking,” the logical fallacy of confirmation bias, MRAs contend that men are systemically crucified and women are systemically coddled by the criminal justice systems of all states and the federal government. Thus, surely, if Abigail Simon had a penis, she would have been sentenced to the maximum of 25-years to life and would serve at least a quarter of a century in prison just like all male teachers and other men convicted of first-degree criminal sexual conduct in Michigan. To this lunatic misogynist, as for all MRAs, she’s obviously a beneficiary of the putative “double standards” and preferential treatment for women, the “pussy pass,” absurdly decried and derided as “chivalry, that the soi-disant “men’s movement” or “men’s rights movement,” essentially the mirror-image of feminism and the “women’s movement,” denounces tirelessly, virulently, hysterically, psychotically,  highlighting cases which conform to their fantasies of ubiquitous “misandry” and anti-male “sexism” and discrimination, and denying and ignoring those which undermine and contravene this narrative of pervasive male victimization.

As feminism is the ideology of female victimization, so “masculism” is the ideology of male victimization. And biological men under age 18 who crave and enjoy sex with adult women, especially teachers, are symbols of male victimization, proof that women can “rape” men and boys, without having penises, in liaisons in which their victims eagerly consent to or initiate their phantasmal and theoretical victimization.