Category Archives: women sex offenders

women convicted of sex crimes

A Misogynist Lunatic, Almost Surely an MRA, Emotes

16 Saturday Jul 2016

Posted by in Abigail Simon, age of consent, CSA victimology, MRAs, "men's movement, Uncategorized, women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters", women as rapists, women sex offenders

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , ,

Bob Pell rages:

FREE? Should get the full 25 years!

He’s omniscient, of course, just like all other hateful commenters, male and female, and is 100% certain she’s lying about everything. Yes, she deserves to be enslaved in a zoo like an animal for at least 25-years because she was convicted of falling in love with a biological man of 15 who loved her and whom she transported to sexual paradise in a country in which, during the 1990s, the decade when the U.S. started to “get tough on crime,” the average-time served for murder (including non-negligent manslaughter) was less than 6-years and the average time-served for all violent crimes (aggravated assault, violent/forcible rape, robbery, homicide) was approximately 4-years.

And one can assume that 90-95% of the males who were sentenced for these crimes were recidivists, most with histories of crime and violence beginning at age 13 or 14 or 15 who should have been buried in prison long before they committed their latest violent felonies. And it’s likely that such averages are even lower and more lenient today after nearly 8-years of rule by Obama and his criminal justice reforms. And since males commit 100% of rapes, 99% (?) of violent sexual assaults, and roughly 90% of nonsexual violent felonies, they’re overwhelmingly the beneficiaries of this systematic leniency.

But through “cherry-picking,” the logical fallacy of confirmation bias, MRAs contend that men are systemically crucified and women are systemically coddled by the criminal justice systems of all states and the federal government. Thus, surely, if Abigail Simon had a penis, she would have been sentenced to the maximum of 25-years to life and would serve at least a quarter of a century in prison just like all male teachers and other men convicted of first-degree criminal sexual conduct in Michigan. To this lunatic misogynist, as for all MRAs, she’s obviously a beneficiary of the putative “double standards” and preferential treatment for women, the “pussy pass,” absurdly decried and derided as “chivalry, that the soi-disant “men’s movement” or “men’s rights movement,” essentially the mirror-image of feminism and the “women’s movement,” denounces tirelessly, virulently, hysterically, psychotically,  highlighting cases which conform to their fantasies of ubiquitous “misandry” and anti-male “sexism” and discrimination, and denying and ignoring those which undermine and contravene this narrative of pervasive male victimization.

As feminism is the ideology of female victimization, so “masculism” is the ideology of male victimization. And biological men under age 18 who crave and enjoy sex with adult women, especially teachers, are symbols of male victimization, proof that women can “rape” men and boys, without having penises, in liaisons in which their victims eagerly consent to or initiate their phantasmal and theoretical victimization.

 

 

A Witch-Burner Emotes

12 Tuesday Jul 2016

Posted by in Abigail Simon, age of consent, CSA victimology, sex offender registry, statutory rape, Uncategorized, women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters", women as rapists, women sex offenders

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , ,

Haida writes:

Abigail was probably the most transparent liar I have ever seen. She looks like a spoiled brat that is used to getting what she wants. The fact that she accused this dumb kid of controlling her, a grown ass woman is bloody laughable. She is gross. Normally I wouldn’t have wanted to see her go to prison, but after that arrogant show she put on for the court, I’m extremely happy she’s sitting in prison now. And I hope it doesn’t go well for her in there.

I know you won’t print this because you’re probably her crazy mom that supported your lying daughter through that trial. Perhaps if you would have told her no once in a while she wouldn’t have grown up to be a narcissistic lying piece of waste.

Dearest Haida,

Yes, I’m Abigail’s “crazy” mother. She’s the author of two books,”The Ideology and Politics of Rape and Child Sexual Abuse,” and “Women as ‘Rapists’ and ‘Pedophiles’: Why Mary Letourneau Served More Time in Prison than the Average Man Convicted of Murder,” neither of which was published, condemning me to a life of poverty. And she wrote these books and is writing posts and articles on this website in the guise of a man with the sobriquet of Michael Kuehl! Michael, yes, but “Kuehl,” a comparatively rare German surname. Given the choice of myriads of surnames, what are the odds she would choose “Kuehl” as a pseudonym?! Talk about “bloody laughable.”

Do you know Abigail and her mother intimately? If not, you must be omniscient, comparable to an all-seeing and all-knowing supranatural being. How else would you know that she was/is an indulgent parent who never said no and so turned her daughter into a “spoiled brat” and “narcissistic lying piece of waste.” (And why single out her mother, and call her “crazy.” I’m sure her father, sisters(?) and brother(?), relatives and friends, etc., also “support” her. Are they all “crazy”?)

Untold myriads of mothers support and love sons who are brutes and savages with histories of crime beginning at age 13 or 14 or 15 who’ve committed dozens of violent and other mala in se felonies, and do so repeatedly and unconditionally; mothers support and love sons who are guilty beyond any doubt of murders and mass-murders that involve kidnappings, home invasions. rape, gang-rape, torture, mutilations, etc., and hope they’re acquitted at trial of all charges so they’re free to commit further atrocities. Mothers support and love sons who are sadists, monsters, lunatics, imbeciles, degenerates, psychopaths. Have you ever called them “crazy,” even one even once, albeit most of them are “crazy” or, to be generous, pathetically and tragically misguided.

Abigail is a highly intelligent, sensitive, educated, and cultured woman who has never committed a violent or other malum in se crime in her life and never will and is not a “threat to society” or to anyone or even a danger to “reoffend” by having sex with another young man under statutory age; a first-offender who was sentenced to  8-25 years in prison and a lifetime of extra/post incarceration penalties for nonviolent and victimless and mala prohibita crimes that are legal acts in dozens of other nations, including European countries.

Whether she’s lying, telling the truth, or telling the truth about some things and lying about others, her sentence is an outrage and travesty, hideously draconian, insanely excessive, and completely gratuitous in preventing and deterring violent and other mala in se felonies. If she’s telling the truth in full or essentially, she was sentenced to 8-25 years in prison and a lifetime of draconian/Orwellian persecution because her “victim” was the aggressor in their sexual intrigue and forced himself on her.  If she’s lying, she was crucified and her life was destroyed for falling in love with a biological man of 15  who loved her and whom she transported to sexual paradise.

And her mother is “crazy” for supporting her!

if not “crazy,” she would have cheered for the prosecution in the hope that her daughter would be convicted on all counts and sentenced to at least 8-25 years in prison and a lifetime of sex-offender registration and electronic parole monitoring. And when she heard the “guilty” verdicts, she would have rejoiced, triumphantly, rather than cried in anguish. And at sentencing, if not crazy, she would have implored the judge to impose the maximum sentence of 25-years to life in prison. If not crazy, she’d be overjoyed that her daughter is enslaved in a zoo like an animal and will be abused and degraded for who knows how many more years and then subjected to a lifetime of quasi-totalitarian surveillance and persecution. She’d be overjoyed that her daughter has to wear an electronic ankle-tether or “bracelet” that she can never remove (by herself, of her own volition) under any circumstances, not when bathing, showering, shaving her legs, having sex, and which can only be removed (by others) when she dies. And that her daughter must register for life as a uniquely deviant and dangerous criminal, her name, mug-shot, and address on the internet, accessible to the public, until she passes from this world at age 77 or 84 or 96 or 102.

A dumb kid” -as if he were 9-years-old and retarded with no sexual compulsions, fantasies, impulses, desires, “kinks,” etc., rather than a 15-year-old biological man, a 6’3″, 220 lb. volcano and hurricane of testosterone at the acme of his erotic powers, 9-inches taller than Abigail and almost a 100 pounds heavier and surely 6-8 times stronger in the upper-body depending on his musculature and bone-density. Why would any “grown ass woman,” as you put it so elegantly, any tutor/teacher, or any little or normal size adult man, conceivably fear such a behemoth, whom I assume you know little or nothing about, or any  biological man under age 18 who is large and muscular and aggressive and often violent and dangerous or potentially so. How many woman teachers, and also male teachers, aren’t afraid of many students, especially young men ages 13-18.

Being omniscient, you know that Abigail is lying about everything. But you and many others, especially women paradoxically, not only know that he didn’t rape her but also seem to be implying that the fear of a “child” and “kid” under age 18 raping or molesting his teacher is absurd and groundless under any circumstances, or virtually any circumstances. Really? just ask all the women teachers, and female students, who’ve been harassed, molested, and raped by male students,especially in large cities, over the last 50 years, including Melissa Bittner and Cassandra Sorenson-Grohall.

Every year, in the real world as opposed to the fantasy world you and millions of other people inhabit, in the U.S. and all other nations and cultures worldwide, biological men ages 13-17 commit millions of rapes and gang-rapes and serious acts of molestation, as in Cologne and other cities in Germany and Sweden and other European countries, overwhelmingly of adult women and underage adolescent girls, including teachers and students, but also prebubertal girls, young men (usually those under age 18), and prepubertal boys. And also millions and millions of other violent and mala in se crimes.

If three “boys” ages 15 and 14 and 13 broke into your home and gang-raped you, penetrating and violating you anally and orally as well as vaginally, for 2-3 hours, I suppose you wouldn’t press charges since they were just “dumb kids” who didn’t know what they were doing and should be released and forgiven, free to rape more women and girls and commit other violent and serious crimes.

Alliances of Enemies

24 Friday Jun 2016

Posted by in Abigail Simon, age of consent, CSA victimology, statutory rape, Uncategorized, women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters", women as rapists, women sex offenders

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , ,

The United States is sui generis in its lunacy and hysteria over sex between young men and women under age 16 or even 18 and adults at least 4-5 years older, especially those in positions of authority, and distinctly cruel and extreme and fanatical in punishing those adults as if they were as execrable and dangerous as violent rapists who brutalize and terrorize their victims and pedophiles who rape and serially molest prepubertal children, largely because of an “unholy alliance” of the anti-sex feminist left and the anti-sex Christian right.

Feminists and CSA victimologists, virtually all of whom are feminists and left-liberals and sexual egalitarians, have succeeded in criminalizing as felonies all sex-acts they deem “non-consensual” and in making all such crimes “gender-neutral,” including acts of “intercourse” (defined under the laws of most states as not only coitus but also fellatio and other sex-acts that involve “penetration,” however slight, of vagina and rectum by lips and tongue and fingers and various “toys” and nonhuman objects) and “sexual contact” between young men and women under age 16 or even 18 and adults at least 4-5 years older in factually consensual relationships, even if the “victims” are the aggressors and initiators of their de jure and phantasmal and theoretical “victimization.”

And the anti-sex Christian right, fundamentalists/evangelicals and other puritans and moral traditionalists -who no longer have the power to criminalize as felonies or even misdemeanors all sex-acts outside of marriage and punish and incarcerate homosexuals, lesbians, adulterers, fornicators, and other deviants, and don’t even have the power and influence to stop the legalization of homosexual marriage in all 50 states and the expansion of “transgender rights” and so forth- can nevertheless join the feminist left they abhor and oppose in inflicting draconian and Orwellian “justice” on adult men and women who have love affairs and trysts and “one-night stands” with biological men and women under statutory age.

And in explaining the unique hysteria and lunacy and fanaticism over adult females, especially teachers, transporting biological men under age 18 to sexual paradise, the hysterical anti-sex feminist left and anti-sex Christian right are joined by MRAs, the misogynist lunatics and zealots of the soi-disant “men’s movement,” who are obsessed with proving that females are as bad or worse than males and with turning men and boys into the victims of women and, consequently, are the loudest and craziest voices in demonizing and vilifying women and especially teachers as “rapists” and “pedophiles” for allowing young men under statutory age to penetrate them in de facto consensual relationships.

So pathological and virulent and obsessive is their hatred of women and lust for vengeance that they’re willing to destroy the lives of myriads of male first-offenders convicted of a nonviolent and usually victimless and quintessential malum prohibitum crime, men who’ve never committed a violent or malum in se felony in their lives and almost surely never will and are rarely a “threat to society” or to anyone or even a threat to re-offend by having sex with another underage adolescent girl, in order to destroy the lives of a far lesser number of women who transport young men under age 18 to sexual paradise.

A Juror Responds

23 Thursday Jun 2016

Posted by in Abigail Simon, CSA victimology, plea-bargain, sex offender registry, Uncategorized, women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters", women as rapists, women sex offenders

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , ,

A juror writes:

She was given several far less severe plea bargains, some of which did not even include time in prison. She denied these. Some of her texts to this boy said things along the lines of “We will name our child after her,” referring to the teen’s recently deceased sister. This woman was guilty and she had an easy way out and did not take it.

Yes, an “easy way out,” a “slap on the wrist,” a short vacation in a “country-club” jail, and then she’d be free, “free as a bird,” free to live a normal life. Such is the view of most people, ignorant and callous and obdurate, who’ve never served a week or even a day or hour in jail and know little or nothing about sex-crime laws and punishments.Yes, in hindsight, she should have accepted the final plea-bargain, but it was far from being “an easy way out” or “slap on the wrist” but rather “the lesser of two evils” and nightmares.

To repeat: the media-coverage of this case was/is simply dreadful, tendentious and hysterical as an agent of CSA victimology, combined with a dearth of facts, concrete and specific and thorough. They don’t even tell us what crime she was supposed to plead guilty to and whether it was a felony or misdemeanor.Or if crimes, whether they were felonies or misdemeanors, or both. Exactly what did this plea-bargain, the final one she rejected, entail? (And what of all the others?) They don’t even specify whether she’d have been released after 5-months, unconditionally, irrespective of her conduct, or whether the deal included a sentence of “only” a year in jail with the possibility of release after “only” 5-months for “good behavior.”

An “easy way out”: at least 5-months and possibly a year in a hellish and hellishly overcrowded jail; mandatory “sex-offender treatment,” punitive and debasing, both in jail and for who knows how many years after her release; who knows how many years of quasi-totalitarian post-incarceration supervision, restrictions on her freedoms and intrusions into her private life that don’t apply to violent and/or recidivist criminals who’ve never been convicted of a sexual offense; electronic parole monitoring with an ankle-tether/”bracelet”(?), and registration for life (or at least 20-30 years) as a uniquely execrable and dangerous criminal: her name, mug-shot, and address on the internet, in Michigan’s and national sex-offender registries, so myriads of people who hate her and were enraged by her lenient sentence, her “slap on the wrist,” could harass and vilify her with a torrent of hate-mail and death-threats, and vigilantes could revile and harass her in person and, possibly, vandalize her property and/or even assault or murder her. All it takes is one lunatic, of which there are legions, to blight and destroy a life in ways that go beyond how the lives of SO are blighted and destroyed by government persecution. I suggest one visit the RSOL website and spend at least a few hours reading some of the articles and many of the comments as to what its like to be on the sex-offender registry.

So the plea-bargain she abjured with it’s “slap on the wrist” and “easy way out” was almost surely a life-sentence of draconian/Orwellian persecution, persecution not only by government, wholly gratuitous in respect to Abigail and myriads of other men and women, but also by haters, perverted and inflamed by the media and its lies and canards and histrionics and sensationalism, and/or MRAs, and possibly even obsessed with revenge for the “victims” and intent on exacting “vigilante justice.”

 

 

 

 

Have You No Shame, “Super” Shyster?

12 Sunday Jun 2016

Posted by in Abigail Simon, age of consent, CSA victimology, lawsuit, statutory rape, Uncategorized, women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters", women as rapists, women sex offenders

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , ,

Grand Rapids, MI -The 15-year-old victim of sexual assault by Catholic school tutor Abigail Simon is 18 now and has filed a lawsuit seeking at least $25,000 from Simon, the private school system, the diocese and several administrators.

The now 18-year-old graduate of Catholic Central High School is represented by Detroit-based Ven Johnson -a so-called “super lawyer” and one-time partner of Geofrey Fieger…

Johnson says the goal of the suit is to bring the diocese out of the dark-ages” when it comes to the sexual abuse of students, including male students, by staff or teachers. “You cannot do this to children and pretend not to notice,” Johnson said, adding that in such cases as these the Catholic Church has tried to “ignore them and sweep them under the rug.” (An allusion to the “priestly pedophilia scandal” and mass-hysteria of the 1990s, M.K.)

The suit alleges the school district and the Roman Catholic Diocese of Grand Rapids did know and or should have known about the six-month sexual liaison between the teen and the $50,000 per-year athletic tutor in 2013.

The new lawsuit accuses Simon…of battery and emotional distress as a result of her criminal actions. “Simon’s conduct in this case is so outrageous in character, and so extreme in degree, as to go beyond all possible limits of decency and is to be regarded as atrocious and utterly intolerable in a civilized community,” the suit opines.

The 18-year-old star athlete in high school was briefly on the roster for a MAC conference university until Johnson says he was forced to drop out due to anxiety, depression, psychological pain and suffering, freight and shock and embarrassment, humiliation and mortification. The suit claims that the teen has diminished earning capacity as a result of his trauma. “It absolutely screws up these young people,” Johnson said. (Barton Deiters, “Teen sex assault victim files lawsuit against tutor, Catholic schools, diocese,” mlive.com., 12-2-2015.

Is he a liar, willing to say anything -no matter how execrable, ludicrous, idiotic, deranged, outrageous, chimerical, grossly exaggerated, demonstrably false- to win a case. Or does he actually believe this nonsense, this grotesque, howling, psychotic nonsense, the title of a post in which I quote Harris Mirkin.

If so, he’s psychotic, totally delusional, completely impervious to and estranged from objective reality, as are all CSA victimologists, and the tens of millions of people they’ve indoctrinated, in respect to all liaisons between young men under age 16 or even 18 and adult women at least 4-5 years older, factually consensual sex in which the “victim” is often if not usually the aggressor and initiator of his phantasmal and theoretical “victimization, which may well have been true in this case even if Abigail is lying about his forcing himself on her. And MRAs, the misogynist vermin of the soi-disant “men’s movement,” who are obsessed with adult women, especially teachers, “raping” young men under age 18, and the millions of men and who knows how many women they’ve poisoned with their toxic melange of woman-hatred and mindless egalitarianism.

Abigail Simon and the End of “Civilization” in Michigan.

04 Saturday Jun 2016

Posted by in Abigail Simon, age of consent, CSA victimology, lawsuit, statutory rape, Uncategorized, women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters", women as rapists, women sex offenders

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , ,

“Simon’s conduct in this case is so outrageous in character, and so extreme in degree, as to go beyond all possible limits of decency and is to be regarded as atrocious and utterly intolerable in a civilized community,” the suit opines.

This lawsuit would be risible if it weren’t so hateful and pernicious, so outrageous, atrocious, intolerable, and extreme in its lies and delusions, so inimical to honesty, realism, decency, fairness.

Johnson lives in Detroit, not in the city, I’m sure, but rather in a mansion in one of the most affluent suburbs.The headline from Forbes: “America’s Most Dangerous Cities: Detroit Can’t Shake NO. 1 Spot.” To quote from the article’s first sentence, “…the Motor City once again tops Forbes’ list of America’s Most Dangerous Cities. (Daniel Fisher, 10-29-2015.)

I checked out the crime statistics for Detroit at citydata.com: 

In 2006, there were 418 murders, 593 rapes, 7240 robberies, 13,143 assaults, 18,134 burglaries, 21,287 thefts, and 22,917 auto thefts. In 2012, there were 386 murders, 441 rapes, 4843 robberies, and 9341 assaults. In 2013, the last year for crime statistics, there were 316 murders, 618 rapes, 4774 robberies, and 8796 assaults.

In Flint, Abigail’s “home town” apparently, pop. 99,763, there were 63 murders, 108 rapes, 673 robberies, and 1930 assaults in 2012. In 2013, there were 48 murders, 145 rapes, 447 robberies, and 1267 assaults.

In Grand Rapids, the city in which she committed her abhorrent and unspeakable crimes and was sentenced to 8-25 years in prison and a lifetime of sex offender registration and electronic parole monitoring, there were 16 murders, 46 rapes, 462 robberies, and 941 assaults in 2012. In 2013, there were 17 murders, 82 rapes, 471 robberies, and 756 assaults.

And “civilization” came to an end in Michigan in 2013 when Abigail had a love affair with a biological man of 15 -assuming she’s lying about his raping and terrorizing her- whose pleasure, realization of his “fantasy,” and love for Abigail were turned into a nightmare by the law and criminal justice system. And the media.

  • “Hateful” not only in inducing hatred of Abigail that might endanger her life both in prison and when and if she’s released but also as deserving the hatred and contempt of those who aren’t CSA victimologists, their myrmidons and votaries in the mass- media, law, politics, education, etc., and the tens of millions of  people in the United States alone, females more than males sans MRAs, the misogynist zealots of the soi-disant “men’s movement,” they’ve poisoned and propagandized.

Melissa Bittner: Transparently Innocent

31 Tuesday May 2016

Posted by in CSA victimology, Melissa Bittner, Uncategorized, women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters", women sex offenders

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , ,

I thought I’d never see a worse travesty and outrage than the Cassandra Sorenson-Grohall case. At least not in the same city or even state and not so soon thereafter. I was wrong. Less than 5 years later, also in Milwaukee, Melissa Bittner was charged with “sexually assaulting” a male student who sexually assaulted her. And on June 25, 2002, the 22-year-old newlywed and ex-music teacher was sentenced to a year in prison and much else for allegedly initiating and/or consenting to 15-20 acts of “sexual contact” with the 16-year-old biological man and criminal who sexually assaulted her. I quote the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, the same reporter who covered the Sorenson-Grohall case:

A former Messmer High School music teacher who had repeated sexual contact with a 16-year-old student after school was sentenced Tuesday to one year in prison followed by three-years of community supervision…The student…indicated that the teacher encouraged his behavior and after one episode “seemed to be very happy and thanked him for doing that to her,” a criminal complaint says…The boy told police the sexual encounters began sometime in September when he stayed after school for special instructions on playing the drum. The student estimated the number of encounters at 15 to 20. “Each time, it (the sexual contact) would get a little more progressive.” Milwaukee County Assistant District Attorney Patti Wabitch told DiMotto on Tuesday. “I think there was more to this relationship than Ms. Bittner was willing to admit.” (David Doege, “Messmer teacher sentenced to one year, ” MJS, 6-26-2002, p. 3B.)

And she was also sentenced to 20-years of sex-offender registration as a uniquely dangerous and degenerate criminal.

Fortunately, a long article in Milwaukee Magazine I found by chance and read almost a year after her sentencing discloses what really happened. My suspicions of innocence and gross and glaring injustice were confirmed. Unsurprisingly, Melissa was the victim and her “victim” was the assailant: “According to Bittner, the ‘humping’ occurred six times. She says she was so scared and intimidated by his advances that she froze, though she always asked him to stop. In the one incident  were Devon says Bittner masturbated him, she claims he forced her hand down his pants and she barely touched his penis.” (Peg Taylor, “The Other Side of Darkness,” MM, Nov. 2002, p. 61.)

Yes, in some ways, this case is even more sickening, execrable, appalling, iniquitous. Unlike Cassandra, Melissa wasn’t raped by her de jure “victim” and de facto victimizer. But, also unlike Cassandra, she was innocent, legally innocent, transparently so, saliently a victim of false accusations, even if she’s not telling the truth as a whole but largely and essentially. And, almost certainly, she never assented, willingly, to a single-act of “intercourse” and “sexual contact” with her tormentor and assailant.

 

What if Melissa had Pled “Not Guilty” in Michigan in 2014?

26 Thursday May 2016

Posted by in Abigail Simon, CSA victimology, Melissa Bittner, Melisssa Bittner, sex offender registry, Uncategorized, women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters", women sex offenders

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, ,

In the Melissa Bittner case, her lawyers insisted that she plead guilty even though I’m sure they believed her claims in full or largely that her alleged “victim” was the aggressor and assailant and that she didn’t consent to a single act of “sexual contact” much less willingly masturbate him. They foolishly assured her that lying and pleading “guilty” or “no contest” would enable them to convince the DA to charge her with a misdemeanor; and, consequently, to recommend a sentence of probation with no time in prison or even jail to which a judge would defer and thus impose.

But what if she had rejected their advise and pled not guilty and went to trial in Michigan in 2014, as did Abigail Simon. Even though she was/is clearly innocent to any minimally honest, realistic, objective, rational, intelligent person, i.e, to anyone not perverted by CSA victimology propaganda, inculcation, and hysteria, she probably would have been found “guilty” of at least a few of the 15-20 “counts” of “sexual contact,” “first-degree criminal sexual conduct” under Michigan Law, by a jury so perverted, and sentenced to at least 8-25 years in prison and a lifetime of sex-offender registration and electronic parole monitoring with a conspicuous and cumbersome ankle-tether or “bracelet.” Even if she was found “guilty” of only one “count” of “first-degree criminal sexual conduct” and “not guilty” of initiating or consenting to all the other acts of “humping” and one act of masturbation, the judge would have had no choice but to impose the mandatory-minimum sentence of 8-25 years in prison and a lifetime of draconian/Orwellian persecution. He would have had no discretion to impose a sane and just and rational sentence of 3-6 months of probation and perhaps 50-100 hours of community service.

Cassandra Sorenson-Grohall

23 Monday May 2016

Posted by in Abigail Simon, Cassandra, Uncategorized, women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters", women as rapists, women sex offenders

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

,

I don’t know if Abigail Simon is telling the truth in claiming that her “victim” was not only the aggressor in their intrigue but also forced himself on her and in testifying that she didn’t want to have sex with him and that the purpose of her responding to hundreds of his emails and text-messages was to keep him away from her.

But it seems that almost everyone, apart from her family and friends(?), thinks she’s lying about everything, even those who think her sentence is an outrage and travesty and, consequently, are largely or partially sympathetic. With one exception, all the people whose comments I’ve read not only think but know that she’s lying albeit I’m sure few of them attended the trial, the sentencing, the pretrial hearing, etc., or perused the transcripts. Their views are derived, with some exceptions, wholly from the media coverage, whose biases in favor of the “victim” and “child” and against the accused I will discuss in some detail later.

I would have to read the trial transcript, the sentencing transcript, the pretrial hearing transcripts, etc, and interview people who knew her and/or the “victim,” before I decided if it was more likely she was lying or telling the truth. Most likely, given all the facts, I’d conclude that her story, the basis of her appeal, is a mixture of truths and falsehoods. And so, too, with her “victim.”

But in regard to the “he said/she said” testimony, the only certainty is that the “child” and “victim” is a liar who either committed perjury when he testified at a pretrial hearing that he was the aggressor who forced himself on Abigail or when he testified at trial that she was the initiator and that the sex was consensual (in respect to her actions, of course, since a “child” of 15 is too young to consent to or knowingly initiate sex with an adult). As for the hundreds of texts and emails they exchanged -without which she might not have been convicted on “three counts of first-degree criminal sexual conduct- I will soon argue, in some length in another post, that this evidence is actually more exculpatory than inculpatory, and explain why it makes her claims more rather than less credible, unless there are things I don’t know and will never know.

Even if I read all the court transcripts, interviewed dozens of people, etc., I could only surmise and form an idea based on facts and logic as to what really or probably happened. I don’t know what occurred, exactly or generally. And never will know. Unlike those who are 100% certain that she’s lying about everything, I’m not omniscient. I can’t read minds. But given the cases of Melissa Bittner and Cassandra Sorenson-Grohall, both in Milwaukee from 1996-2002 and who knows how many similar cases of which I’m unaware, it’s possible that Abigail is telling the truth about her “victim” being the aggressor who forced himself on her, if not as a whole then largely or essentially with some half/partial-truths and exaggerations/embellishments. With Melissa and Cassandra, unlike Abigail, I know that they were harassed, molested, and sexually assaulted by their “victims.” And Cassandra was also raped.

On April 7, 1997, Cassandra was sentenced to 4-years in prison for having sex with a criminal of 15 who initiated the “affair” by raping her and then sustained it by threats and manipulation, apparently. And at school, as a prelude to forcing himself on her when she visited him at his home on school business, obviously when no one else was present, he constantly harassed her, hounded her, implored her for sex, molested her, kissed her against her will.. I don’t know if she reported all or most or any of these “incidents” to school authorities. But if she did, little or nothing was done to punish or discipline her tormentor or create a situation in which she’d be protected from his assaults and importunities.

The MJS reporter doesn’t describe the assault at the “victim’s” home in any detail, concrete and specific. But at sentencing, addressing a clearly unsympathetic judge, her lawyer repeatedly called the assault “rape” and noted that her “victim” might have been waived into adult court” had she reported the crime to police. Idealistic and compassionate, she didn’t report the rape lest her assailant “would go to prison and become more of a delinquent” and she didn’t end the intrigue that followed because she didn’t know “how to stop it without hurting him.” In a letter she wrote me from prison, she described her “crime” as a “mistake made out of overcaring and naivete.” She also told me that two psychologists (apparently for the defense and thus capable of objectivity and independence) concluded that she was not a “sexual predator” nor a “threat to society and children” and that the intrigue was not a “sexually-motivated crime but one manipulated by the victim.”

But despite all of this and who knows what other “mitigating factors,” a loathsome and/or craven judge sentenced her to 4-years in prison. And, unlike myriads of violent recidivists, she was denied “discretionary parole,” release from prison after serving 1/4 of her nominal sentence, and was thus enslaved for almost 3-years in a country in which, during the 1990s, the average time-served for murder was less than 6-years and the average time-served for all violent crimes was approximately 4-years.

Mandatorily released from prison after 32-months, she was subjected to years of “active community supervision.” Because she acquiesced to sex with a criminal and biological man under age 18 who raped and molested her in a liaison that wasn’t “sexually-motivated” but “manipulated” by a de jure and theoretical “victim” who wasn’t prosecuted for his sexual assaults, she was judged a dire threat to every child in Milwaukee, the adjacent suburbs, the state of Wisconsin, all of the U.S., and the entire world. Thus she couldn’t go shopping, see a doctor, visit friends, travel to other cities and states and countries, and do sundry other things in public and private without the permission of her parole agent.

And everyone convicted of “second-degree sexual assault,” irrespective of the facts and circumstances, must register her life as a uniquely monstrous, execrable, and dangerous criminal, unlike stereotypical criminals who’ve committed murders and other violent and mala in se crimes but who’ve never been convicted of a sexual offense. And because she is classified as level-3 offender, the worst of the worst, theoretically as deviant and dangerous as violent rapists who terrorize and brutalize and kidnap and murder their victims and men (including underage adolescents) who prey on and rape and/or serially molest prepubescent girls and boys, her name, mugshot, and address will be on the internet, accessible to everyone, until she passes from this world in her 70’s or 80’s or 90’s or 100’s. So even her “victim,” assuming he’s not dead or buried in prison, can go online, see her address, and possibly visit her some warm summer night.

To call all of this insane is an understatement. It’s beyond insanity.

* She was convicted of the offense above, a felony with a maximum sentence of 20-years in prison, in a plea-bargain. She was initially charged with “repeated sexual assaults of the same child,” theoretically a more serious crime with a maximum sentence of 40-years in prison.

 

Kirk Douglas was “Raped” by his Teacher

12 Thursday May 2016

Posted by in Abigail Simon, CSA victimology, Debra Lafave, Uncategorized, women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters", women as rapists, women sex offenders

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , ,

Kirk Douglas fondly recalls an affair with his teacher: “I had been a ragamuffin kid of 15 coping with a neighborhood filled with gangs. Under my teacher’s guidance, I became a different person. I’m eternally grateful. By today’s standards, she would have gone to jail. I had no idea we were doing something wrong. Did she?”

It’s understandable why a young man of 15 wouldn’t feel and think that something so pleasurable, so natural, so exciting. so gratifying, so empowering was “wrong.” And, obviously, given such feelings (even assuming he did feel it was “wrong” because of moral and religious inculcation), he didn’t think he was a victim of “rape” and CSA who was “traumatized,” devastated, and “scarred for life.”

What of his teacher? It’s likely she thought it was “wrong” in the sense of it being “inappropriate” and unprofessional. But perhaps she didn’t even think that. And I’m certain she didn’t think it was “wrong”in the sense of being aberrant and unnatural and/or egregiously immoral and transgressive. And, even more so, I’m sure she didn’t think it was “wrong” in the sense that she was a “rapist” and “pedophile” and “child molester,” and that her lover was a victim of “rape” and CSA who was “traumatized” and “scarred for life.”

And it’s likely that she knew or feared she was guilty of a “moral’s offense,” however defined, but wasn’t unduly worried since there was little chance of anyone knowing or suspecting they were having sex and telling school officials or calling the police.

But today, almost surely, she’d be arrested, prosecuted, convicted of a felony or felonies, and sentenced to anywhere from 6-12 in jail, if lucky, to 10-30 years in prison; to years of punitive “sex offender treatment,” both in jail or prison and after her release; years of quasi-totalitarian post-incarceration supervision; and registration for life as a uniquely monstrous and dangerous criminal. And she’d be vilified as a “sexual predator,” “child molester,” “pedophile,” and “rapist” with no penis, and Douglas would be viewed and defined as the “victim” of a traumatic and life-destroying violation even if he told the authorities and all else that he enjoyed the sex and was a willing participant -because this was his actual experience, incredulously, in contrast to the delusions of CSA victimologists.

Now, apparently, Douglas knows their affair was “wrong.” But does he think it should have been a felony as it is today and since the 1970’s or even a misdemeanor? Does he think his teacher and women like Mary Letourneau, Debra Lafave, Cassandra Sorenson-Grohall, Melissa Bittner, Abigail Simon, and many others are “rapists” and “pedophiles” who should be charged with felonies and sentenced to months in jail or years in prison and all the extra/post-incarceration punishments? It would be fascinating to read or hear his opinions in an interview in a magazine or on national television.

Ironically and paradoxically, in respect to intrigues and dalliances between young men under age 18 and adult females, above all teachers, the America of today and of the last 20-years is far more repressive, draconian, hysterical, irrational, delusional, and inquisatorial than the America of Douglas’s youth, the “good-old-days” or “bad-old-days,” depending on one’s values and politics and weltanschauung.

Savor the irony, the poetic injustice, if you will: without her guidance, he might have ended up dead or buried in prison rather than going on to become a rich and famous and legendary actor, one of the most feted and iconic of all the great movie stars of the post World-War II era. Not only did she turn him into a “different person,” not only did she enrich his life morally and artistically and intellectually, not only did she give him the sex that he craved and  enjoyed and fondly remembers, she might have even saved his life. But if they had such an affair today or in the 1990’s, her life would be blighted -profoundly, tragically, hellishly- if not utterly destroyed. She would be branded with the “new-age” scarlet letter, figuratively, until she died. She would never be free again. Unlike her “victim,” she’d be traumatized, devastated, and scarred for life.