Category Archives: women sex offenders

women convicted of sex crimes

Why the Sexes don’t Understand Each Other, and How this Relates to Women having Sex with Young Men under Statutory Age

11 Thursday Jan 2018

Posted by in Abigail Simon sentence, age of consent, criminal sentences, CSA victimology, innate sex differences, embodiment, maleness and femaleness, MRAs, "men's movement, Uncategorized, women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters", women as rapists, women sex offenders

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , ,

The fundamental reason men and women don’t understand each other is because they have different bodies. The only way men could understand female sexuality, comprehend it fully as lived experience, is if they had female bodies. The only way that men could understand what it’s like to be a woman in respect to pregnancy, sexuality, hormones, menstruation, etc. is if they were female.

The only way that women could understand male sexuality, especially that of young males in their 20s and teens, comprehend it fully as lived experience, is if they had penises and male levels of testosterone, which would make them male rather than female.

With the exception of “men’s rights activists” -pathological and vehement misogynists and thus the loudest and craziest voices in demonizing and vilifying women as “rapists” and “pedophiles” for transporting biological men under age 18 to sexual paradise in factually consensual relationships0- women in general are more punitive and hysterical than men over affairs and trysts in which the “victims” almost always enjoy the sex far more than the women who “rape” and “molest” them and are often if not usually the aggressors and initiators of their phantasmal and theoretical “victimization.”

The reason for this is not only that women as a group are more vitiated by feminist and CSA victimology propaganda and inculcation, but also because women don’t understand male sexuality, especially that of males in their 20’s and teens, including young men under age 18 who consent to or initiate sex with adult women. Their corruption by feminism and obsession with equality as sameness explains, paradoxically, why many if not most women, at least among educated women, are more angry over adult females, especially teachers in positions of authority, having sex with young men under statutory age than they are with adult men and even male teachers having sex with underage adolescent girls, and more punitive in their calls for retribution.

In respect to sex between adults and underage adolescents, this ignorance of male sexuality also explains why women in general are less likely to criticize and oppose and more likely to support the insanely and uniquely draconian/Orwellian laws and punishments, grotesque and gratuitous, “cruel and unusual,” imposed on adults who are at least 4-5 years older than their de jure “victims,” especially as they relate to women having sex with young men under statutory age.

It explains why women are more likely than men (save MRA’s and the likes of Barton Dieters) to view the young men as “victims” of “rape” and CSA who’ll be “traumatized and scarred for life” and the women as “rapists” and “pedophiles” who deserve to be sentenced to years or even decades in prison and subjected to mandatory “sex-offender treatment,” quasi-totalitarian post-incarceration supervision, electronic parole-monitoring with an ankle-tether/”bracelet,” possibly for life as with Abigail Simon, and a lifetime or at least 20-30 years of public registration on the internet as uniquely dangerous and degenerate criminals, unlike myriads of low-IQ brutes and savages who’ve committed dozens and scores of violent and other mala in se crimes but have never been convicted of a sexual offense albeit most of them have raped or gang-raped men in jails and prisons and/or women  and adolescent girls. Because of the media, primarily, untold millions of women hate Mary Letourneau, Debra Lafave, and Abigail Simon more than all these low-IQ brutes and savages put together. whose crimes the media ignores and suppresses, with some exceptions.

 

 

Beyond Insanity: Woman teacher sentenced to 40-Years in prison for having sex with 14-year-old male student

29 Wednesday Nov 2017

Posted by in "anarcho-tyranny", age of consent, criminal sentences, CSA victimology, MRAs, "men's movement, plea-bargain, statutory rape, Uncategorized, women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters", women as rapists, women sex offenders

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

, , , , ,

From news.com (8/16/2013):

Teacher jailed for 40-years for sex with student age 14. From Daily Mail, 2-18- Shannon Alicia Schmieder, 39, will have to serve 20 years in the toughest sentence ever handed out by a U.S. court to a teacher accused of underage sex, The Daily Mail reported (February 18, 2012).

And from human-stupidity.com (8/16/13):

Female teacher Shannon Alicia Schmieder, in Coweta, Georgia received a 40-year jail sentence for sex with a 14-year-old boy. This fills some men’s rights proponents with glee: finally a woman gets a taste of the bitter “age of consent” medicine concocted by feminists and religious zealots: the same high jail terms men routinely get sentenced to. Making love carries the same prison term as murder or manslaughter.

Actually, her 40-year prison (not jail) sentence “fills” nearly all MRAs with “glee.” And her sentence, if she serves the full 40-years, is roughly 7-times more severe than the average-time served for murder, and almost 4-times more severe if she’s paroled after “only” 20-years. 40-years in prison, under a plea-bargain, apparently, and she won’t be eligible for parole until she’s been enslaved and abused and degraded for 20 years in a chthonic Georgia prison -at least 20-years if not longer in a country in which, during the 1990’s, the decade in which the U.S. began to “get tough on crime,” the average time-served for murder was less than 6-years and the average time-served for all violent felonies (aggravated assault, robbery, rape, and homicide) was approximately 4-years! And one can be sure that over-90% of these felonies, among the male offenders, were committed by recidivists, most of whom should have been in prison rather than free to commit more violent felonies. And given their crime rates in relation to those of females, males are the beneficiaries, overwhelmingly, of this systemic leniency.

So it’s not true that adult men, including violent and/or recidivist criminals, are “routinely” sentenced to 40-years in prison for having sex with pubescent teenagers under statutory age. I doubt if the average sentence for all adult men, including those with prior criminal records, is even 4-5 years. It’s true that male teachers are often sentenced to 10-20 years in prison for having love affairs and mere trysts with underage female and male adolescents in a country in which violent and/or recidivist male criminals are routinely and systematically coddled.

But rather than decry and oppose the hideously draconian prison sentences often inflicted on male teachers and the draconian/Orwellian post-incarceration punishments inflicted on all male teachers -virtually all of whom are first-offenders convicted of nonviolent and usually victimless and mala prohibita felonies that are often legal acts (or perhaps misdemeanors) in dozens of other nations, including European countries, men who’ve never committed a violent or other mala in se crime in their lives and almost surely never will and are not a “threat to society” or to anyone nor usually even a danger to re-offend by having sex with another underage teenager- MRAs demand that the lives of women be destroyed by the same hideously draconian/Orwellian punishments.

So pathological and virulent and obsessive is their hatred of women and lust for vengeance -against not only those they revile and asperse as “feminazis” but women in general and white females in particular, usually because of the actions of one or a few women in their personal lives, nearly always ex-wives, and/or sexual frustration- that they’re willing to destroy the lives of myriads of men who are not violent or dangerous in order to destroy the lives of a much smaller number of women who transport biological men under statutory age to carnal Elysium.

And with a distinctly venomous fixation on and obsession with notorious “rapists” and “pedophiles” like Mary Letourneau, Debra Lafave, and other teachers who, in contrast to men in the inverted fantasy world these deranged misogynists inhabit, nearly always receive “a slap on the wrist” and little or no serious punishment.

Consummate and tireless practitioners of the logical fallacy of confirmation bias, “masculinists” cherry-pick cases in which men are sentenced to 20-30 years in prison for having sex with underage adolescents, males and females, and contrast them with cases of women who receive probation or “only” 6-12 months in jail or “only” 1 or 2 years in prison, thus advancing the lie and canard that men are nearly always sentenced to 20 or 30 years in prison while women are nearly always sentenced to probation or a few months in jails that are benign and liveable compared to male prisons and the male housing units of jails -not because male inmates, generally, are far more violent, brutal, vicious, sadistic, predatory, etc., but because of “misandry” and anti-male “sexism” and discrimination. Men are crucified, almost invariably, their lives destroyed, while female “rapists,” “predators,” “child molesters,” and “pedophiles” are shockingly and scandalously indulged, almost invariably, walking away with a “slap-on-the-wrist.”

Tell that to Shannon Schmieder, Michelle Taylor, Abigail Simon, Kathryn Ronk, Mary Letourneau, Cassandra Sorenson-Grohall, Melissa Bittner (a transparently innocent women who was sentenced to a year in prison for “sexual assaults” that were committed against her by her “victim,” a 16-year-old criminal who was charged with murder shortly thereafter), Pamela Rogers. and many other women who are punished more or even far more severely than myriads of violent male criminals, usually recidivists, who commit aggravated assaults, muggings, armed robberies, gang-shootings, home invasions, rape, gang-rapes, and murders.

And even those who are sentenced to probation or “only” 6-12 months in hellish jails are actually sentenced to a lifetime or at at least 20-30 years of draconian/Orwellian persecution, including public registration (their names, mug-shots, and addresses on the internet for all to see and what that entails in regard to danger and mortification) as uniquely dangerous and degenerate criminals, unlike myriads of male brutes and savages with histories of crime and violence beginning at age 13 or 14 who’ve committed dozens and scores of violent and other mala in se crimes  but have never been convicted of a sexual offense albeit most of them have committed rapes and/or gang-rapes either of men in jails and prisons and/or of women and adolescent girls in the free world.

Even Debra Lafave, one of few women, and perhaps the only female, to receive probation with no jail time since the Letourneau hysteria of 1997, was punished more severely in many ways than violent and/or recidivist male criminals who’ve never been convicted of a sexual offense: 3-years of house-arrest (prohibited from leaving her mother’s house while not working), 7-years of parole, at least 10 years of electronic parole-monitoring with an ankle-tether/”bracelet” she could never remove; restrictions of her freedoms and intrusions into her private life that don’t apply to violent and/or recidivist male criminals who’ve never been convicted of a sexual offense (she was arrested and jailed and could have been sentenced to 15-years in prison for talking to a 17-year-old female co-worker about non-work related matters at a fast-food restaurant); and a life-sentence of public sex-offender registration.

Yes, all this was/is a “slap on the wrist” for the vile and heinous crime of engaging in a few acts of coitus and fellatio with a young man under statutory age, consensual sex the memories of which the de jure “victim” will forever cherish. And this was defined as “rape” and Debra as a “rapist” and the young man as a “victim” who is “traumatized” and “scarred for life” by having sex with a gorgeous and ravishing 23-year-old woman. The only suffering and “trauma” he endured was a result of the law and criminal justice system, and the media and its histrionic and sensationalist coverage, not only local and state but also national and even international, turning Debra into the most infamous and despised woman sex criminal since Mary Letourneau.

 

 

Beyond Insanity: 34-year-old Nevada woman sentenced to life in prison for allegedly “forcing” a 13-year-old male to touch her breast.

27 Monday Nov 2017

Posted by in "anarcho-tyranny", "sex-offender treatment", "traumatization", age of consent, plea-bargain, Uncategorized, women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters", women sex offenders

≈ 3 Comments

Tags

, , , , ,

“Does the Punishment Fit the Crime? ” So asks www. kolotv.com. in a brief article:

An Elko County woman convicted of forcing a 13-year-old boy to touch her breasts was sentenced to life in prison. Michelle Lyn Taylor, 34, was convicted of lewdenss with a minor under 14 in November. Taylor’s attorney, public defender Alina Kilpatrick says it is the harshest sentence ever dealt to a female sex offender in Nevada. Kilpatrick  called the sentence unconstitutional. “This is cruel and unusual punishment,” Kilpatrick said. “She put his hand on her boob while she was wearing a bra, now she’s getting life.”

Elko County District Attorney Gary Woodbury said Taylor was “convicted of precisely what she did,” and under the state sentencing guidelines, life in prison was mandatory. Woodbury says Taylor did not want to negotiate a plea deal because she did not want to have to register as a sex offender. Woodbury says Taylor felt her life would be over if she had to register (as a sex offender) so it wouldn’t matter what she was convicted of.  Woodbury says while it might be some adolescent male’s fantasy to have sex with a woman, in this case it was a traumatic event. The child has needed and continues to receive therapy.

She was arrested, prosecuted, and convicted at trial in 2010. Apparently, she was so drunk that she didn’t even recall what occurred exactly. And, apparently, she was found guilty of this heinous crime solely on the “he said/she said” uncorroborated testimony of a 13-year-old male. There was no physical evidence, obviously, nor any neutral witnesses.

According to some accounts, Taylor wanted to have sex with the young man. In the fantasy world inhabited by CSA victimologists, most of whom are women and nearly all of whom are feminists and left-liberals, and that of MRAs, the misogynist lunatics of the soi-disant “men’s rights movement,” and all those they’ve brainwashed, biological men under age 16 or 18 (and even “adults” of 18 if the woman is a teacher or tutor like Abigail Simon) are too impotent and innocent and paralyzed by fear to say “no” and reject the advances of a female who is an adult and at least 4-5 years older -albeit they are horrified and repulsed by the prospect of having sex with them even if they’re as ravishing as Debra Lafave or as lovely as Mary Letourneau. But in this situation, obviously, a 13-year-old male was fully capable of saying “no” and resisting a woman’s advances and importunities, probably because she was overweight, unattractive, and sloppy drunk.

“A traumatic event” and “the child has needed and continues to receive therapy.” To MRAs and CSA victimologists, all such “events” -whether love affairs or trysts or even a single act of “sexual contact”- are “non-consensual”  and coercive by definition and “traumatic” for the “child” and “victim” irrespective of the facts and circumstances. The young men are “victims” of “rape” and CSA even if they were the aggressors and initiators and even if they raped and/or molested their “victimizers.’ And they’re devastated and “traumatized”  and must be subjected to months or even years of psycho-therapy, even if they claim to have enjoyed the sex, whether coitus or fellatio or simply kissing and fondling and “sexual contact,” because they did enjoy it many or  or a few times or just once , usually far more than the women who “raped” and “molested” them, and thus are not aware of being “traumatized” because, in fact as opposed to fantasy,  they were and are not “traumatized.”

In reality, any “trauma” he suffered was a corollary of Nevada’s draconian sex-crime laws, the criminal justice system, the trial, cross-examination, the media coverage, and mandatory psycho-therapy which in theory can only cure or mollify his “trauma” by persuading him that he was “traumatized” and “scarred for life” by touching a woman breast while she was wearing a bra, not by the act of touching a woman’s breast in private, And how can a woman “force” a young man to touch her breast “against his will” if he’s bigger and stronger than her?

It would be interesting and revealing to know the average time-served in Nevada for males convicted of violent crimes: aggravated assaults, robbery, violent/forcible rapes, gang shootings, home invasions, murder, etc. And I’m sure that over 90% of the males who commit such felonies are recidivists, a majority  of whom should have been in prison rather than free to commit more violent and mala in se felonies. And what is the average time-served in jail or prison for adult men who have sex with underage teenagers?

And are men guilty of a felony with a mandatory sentence of life in prison if convicted at trial of forcing adolescent girls under age 14 to touch their chests while clothed? Men don’t have breasts, of course, but they have nipples. And women are guilty of felonies and defined and vilified as “rapists” for engaging in coitus with biological men under statutory age even though they don’t have penises with which to penetrate and impregnate their “victims.”

The public defender noted that the woman was wearing a bra when she allegedly “forced” the young man to touch her breast. I assume that she would have received a life sentence if she was wearing not only a bra but also a blouse or sweater or winter coat when she allegedly “forced” him to touch her breast.

Finally, if a young man of 13 or 14 or 15  (or even 16 or 17 in states in which the generic age of consent is 17 or 18 rather than 16) is “traumatized” by touching an adult woman’s breast while she’s fully clothed or wearing a bra, then what of infants who suck their mother’s nipples every day during months of breast-feeding? Should breast-feeding be criminalized, as a felony, at least if the mother claims that she enjoys the sensations of her baby sucking her nipples and finds it at least mildly erotic? Or in all instances, with all the penalties that are inflicted on adult women who have affairs or trysts or engage in a single act of sexual contact with biological men under statutory age?

A Judge Dismisses the Lawsuit Against the Catholic Diocese

22 Monday May 2017

Posted by in Abigail Simon, lawsuit, Uncategorized, women as rapists, women sex offenders

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , ,

Writes John Tunison at mlive.com:

A judge has dismissed a lawsuit against the Catholic Diocese of Grand Rapids and three Catholic school employees filed by the teen sexual assault victim of tutor Abigail Simon…Attorneys for the teen -who was a 15-year-old Catholic Central High School student when he had sexual encounters with tutor Abigail Simon- have filed an appeal with the state Court of Appeals…In late 2015, the teen filed a lawsuit against the Diocese, Grand Rapids Catholic Secondary School and three administrators, claiming not enough was done to prevent Simon from abusing the teen.

But Kent County Circuit Judge George Quist granted a motion to dismiss the case. In a written opinion, Quist disagreed with claim that school officials knew or should have known that Simon was involved in relations with the teen. “By plaintiff’s own testimony, no school staff member saw or had reason to believe that he and Simon were engaged in a sexual relationship,” Quist wrote….In the lawsuit, the teen sought damages of at least $25,000 from the schools and the administrators. (mlive.com, 3/15-2017.)

Obviously, if there was any evidence to support the allegations in this lawsuit against the Diocese and “three administrators” -that “school staff members” knew that Abigail was having sex with the football star and other male students at two high schools and “accosting” minors for “immoral purposes” but didn’t inform the authorities- the judge would not have dismissed the lawsuit. So, apparently, the allegations were all lies and exaggeration -apart from Abigail having sex with the young man, assuming he didn’t force himself on her, and exchanging hundreds of emails and text messages- as I argued in my post “Abigail is Sued by Her ‘Victim’.”

Good news for the Diocese, but not for Abigail?

The Michigan Supreme Court ruling that mandatory minimum sentences were “unconstitutional” and the appellate court decision upholding her convictions but ordering a re-sentencing should have resulted in her release from prison on “time-served” or at least a sentence of 3-4 years with “time-served” and also the overturning of her life-sentence of electronic parole monitoring with an ankle-tether/”bracelet.” But, deplorably, the judge who had no discretion but to impose the mandatory-minimum sentence of 8-25 years in prison and all the other penalties now had the discretion to impose a far less punitive sentence but instead chose to uphold her grotesquely draconian/Orwellian sentence.

Apart from cravenness, which was paramount (as I explained in the previous article on Abigail’s re-sentencing), another reason the judge might have upheld her draconian/Orwellian sentence -not only that of 8-25 years in prison but also the life-sentence of electronic parole monitoring- is that he believed all or most of the accusations in the lawsuit filed against the Catholic Diocese and Abigail by her “victim.”

If this is true, at least to some degree, however large, then his view of Abigail as a “predator” who deserved to be imprisoned for at least 8-years if not longer and subjected to a life-sentence of electronic-monitoring was based on lies and exaggerations.

“…not enough was done to prevent Simon  from abusing the teen.” If the “victim” experienced acts of coitus and fellatio and so forth with Abigail and also the hundreds of emails and texts they exchanged as “abusive” rather than thrilling and gratifying and empowering, all he had to do was end the relationship. And if Abigail was the initiator and aggressor, all he had to do was say “no” and he would not have been “abused” by having sex with an attractive and desirable woman. We’re supposed to believe that a 6’3″, 220 lb. biological man and football star was so terrified of Abigail because of her age and power and authority -when he outweighed her by almost a 100 pounds and was at least 6-8 times stronger in the upper-body- that he was too afraid to say no, initially, and repel her importunities, assuming she was the “aggressor,” and then too fearful to end the relationship. And, also, that he was too young and immature to consent to or initiate sex, knowingly and willingly, with an adult female. (I discuss this at length in “More on Traumatization” and also in many other article/blog-posts.)

Assuming she’s lying, the reason he assented to or initiated sex with Abigail and didn’t end the affair is because the sex was thrilling and gratifying and empowering. And so, too, the hundreds of emails and text-messages. And even if he didn’t rape and terrorize her, even if he never forced himself on her, it’s not only possible, I’d say it’s likely, that he was the aggressor. And even if Abigail was the initiator, it’s reasonable to assume that she was responding, usually if not always, to his messages, not vice-versa, probably because she didn’t want to have sex with him as she testified in court and told the police and prosecutors. If so, she was telling the truth about his “controlling her life,” essentially, and perhaps also as to her fearing him, though with lies and exaggerations.

More on Traumatization

26 Wednesday Apr 2017

Posted by in "sex-offender treatment", "traumatization", age of consent, MRAs, "men's movement, Uncategorized, women as rapists, women sex offenders

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, ,

“Trauma” defined: “a mental condition caused by severe shock, especially when the harmful effects last for a long time.” (Oxford learners dictionaries); “a deeply distressing or disturbing experience.” (Oxford dictionaries); “a very difficult or unpleasant experience that causes someone to have mental or emotional problems usually for a long time”; “a disordered psychic or behavioral state resulting from severe mental or emotional stress….(Merriam-Webster)

The above, according to the “conventional wisdom,” defines the varied experiences, the emotions, the psychic states of and effects on young men under age 16 or even 18 who have sex with adult females who are at least 4-5 years older. Invariably so, according to the dogmas of CSA victimologists, irrespective of the facts and circumstances: whether the women seduced them or they were the aggressors and initiators or their liaisons could be defined as a mutual coming together, or whether they had sex dozens of times over a period of months or engaged in a single act of coitus or fellatio or “sexual contact,” and so forth.

In nearly all instances, in reality and fact as opposed to theory and fantasy, the experiences of young men under age 18 who have sex with adult women are the antithesis of traumatization.

Generally, in reality and fact as opposed to theory and fantasy, if one is traumatized by one or a few or many experience(s), one feels the trauma, immediately and profoundly, viscerally and unequivocally, and knows one is traumatized. One isn’t traumatized if one isn’t aware of being traumatized. If there is any doubt as to whether one was traumatized, then one wasn’t traumatized.

If one is traumatized, deeply and genuinely, by one or a few or many experiences, one doesn’t need to be subjected, willingly or compulsorily, to hours and days and weeks and months and years of psycho-therapy to make one realize that one was traumatized, unconsciously, by an act or acts that one experienced, consciously, as supremely pleasurable, and remembers fondly as gratifying, exciting, fulfilling, empowering.

Unless they’re insane and/or masochistic, people don’t assent to or initiate acts that they know will be traumatizing. And, even more so, they don’t continue to assent to or initiate acts which they experienced as traumatizing.

In regard to instances in which adult women try to seduce or initiate sex with young men under statutory age: If biological men under age 18 don’t want to have sex with adult females for whatever reasons -because they’re in love with girls their own age and don’t want to betray them; because they’re “players” and “super-studs” who’ve had sex many times before and only have sex with females who are at least an “8” and the woman who wants to have sex with them is only a “6′ or at best a “7”; because they were raised to believe that sex outside of marriage is “sinful” and immoral by fundamentalist-evangelical Christian parents; because they’re homosexual, etc.- all they have to do is say “no,” rudely or politely, brusquely or apologetically, to repel their advances and importunities.

Once again, we see how CSA victimologists and those they’ve indoctrinated, most perniciously the ruling-elites and governing-classes,  conflate biological men under age 16 or even 18 with prepubescent girls of 10 and 11. Just as the latter are too young and sexless and innocent to say “no” and resist the sexual aggressions of adult men 18-years of age and older and pubescent teenage males under age 18, so the former are too young and immature to say “no” and repel the advances of women who are nearly always smaller and weaker and usually far smaller and weaker than their putative “victims,” and will not resort to violence/force or overt threats of same (physical assaults and/or weapons) if rebuffed since they’re not violent and deranged and psychopathic -and even if they were violent, they too small and weak to compel the submission of young men under age 16 or 18 who are larger and stronger.

And how many times, in all of history, has a women used a knife or gun to terrorize a young man under statutory age (or of any age from 18 to 80) into submitting to coitus or other sex-acts “against his will”?  At worst, such crimes are so rare as to be negligible, statistically, and virtually nonexistent in contrast to the known and told and unknown and untold millions and millions of rapes and gang-rapes and sexual assaults that adult men and underage teenage males have committed against adult women and underage teenage and prepubescent girls and boys. And also, appallingly, the myriads if not millions of male-on-male rapes and gang-rapes and sexual assaults, predominantly in jails and prisons and detention camps.

Thus, in the minds of CSA victimologists (and also MRAs, for divergent reasons and motives), they have no choice but to engage in sex-acts that will “traumatize,” “devastate,” and “scar” them for life: even if they’ve had sex before, often many times before, with underage adolescent girls, and/or outweigh the women who “rape” them by 50-100 lbs. and are 4-6 times stronger in the upper body. But they’re not too young and immature to be charged with felonies and possibly “waived” into adult court if they rape adult females and underage adolescent girls.

The reason why few biological men under statutory age will reject the advances of adult females is because they want to have sex with them, just as they want to have sex with underage adolescent girls, and know the sex with be pleasurable.

If biological men under age 18 have had sex once or a few or many times with adolescent girls under age 18, then they know that acts of coitus and fellatio with adult women, teachers or whoever, will be just as if not even more exciting and gratifying and empowering, physically and psychologically, depending on the circumstances: e.g., the milieu in which they “make love,” the expertise of the woman in the fine arts of love-making, the attractiveness and desirability of the woman, etc.

If they’re virgins and have never had sex with a female, they’ve surely masturbated, most weekly, many daily, and experienced their orgasms as pleasurable: the tickle, the tingle, the sting, and the spit, and then deep relaxation, the joys of onanism. So even if they’re virgins, they know that that sliding or jamming their penises into the vagina of an adult women and ejaculating inside her will be even more gratifying, physically and psychologically, than self-pleasuring by hand in a bedroom or bathroom or wherever in onanistic solitude,  vitiated by anxiety if their parents are home and nearby or if in a public restroom. Or so, too, with her warm, wet lips and tongue fellating him to orgasmic ecstasy.

Ironically, the hysterical and dogmatic fantasy and insistence of the modern anti-sex feminist left that young men under age 16 or even 18 who eagerly assent to or initiate sex with adult women at least 4-5 years older will be “traumatized” and “scarred for life” is comparable to the hysterical and dogmatic fantasy and insistence of anti-sex Christian puritans that young men who masturbated would “go insane” before they were sentenced to hell for eternity. if they didn’t believe that Jesus was the son of God who was born of a virgin and resurrected the moment he died on the cross. If they did so believe, they would still have “gone insane” from onanism but would have ascended to Heaven after death to enjoy an eternity of bliss as an immortal soul and disembodied mind who can’t have sex with other souls or masturbate.

Beyond Insanity: Anarchy in Chicago

16 Monday Jan 2017

Posted by in "anarcho-tyranny", Abigail Simon, Abigail Simon sentence, criminal sentences, sex offender registry, Uncategorized, women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters", women as rapists, women sex offenders

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , ,

From the Guardian:

As violence rises, an increasing number of shootings and murders are going unsolved. Through 28 August, the police department had only made arrests in 73 of the nearly 2,000 non-fatal shooting incidents so far this year -or just under 4%, according to a department spokesman.

The clearance rate for murders is not much better…Police have only made arrests in about 16% of fatal shootings through 28  August this year…Through June, the clearance rate for all murders was 22.2%…(Lois Beckett and Justin Glawe, “Gun Violence, unsolved murders put Chicago on course to set grim record,” 9-4-2016.)

And I’m sure that over 90% of these murders and shootings were committed by violent recidivists who should have been in prison rather than free to commit well over 2,000 shootings, fatal and non-fatal, and other violent and mala in se crimes. And what percentage have histories of crime and violence beginning at ages 14 or 13 or even 12, whatever the age of puberty and biological manhood, and have committed dozens and scores of violent and predatory crimes, from murder and rape to burglary and vandalism, and should have been buried in prison years ago, at least until the age of 30 or 40 or 50, depending on the nature of their crimes and recidivism and number of felony convictions. Illinois abolished the death penalty in 2011.

And of the 16% arrested for murder and the less than 4% arrested for non-fatal shootings, what percentage will be prosecuted? And of those prosecuted, what percentage will be convicted? And of those convicted, virtually all in plea-bargains, what percentage will be incarcerated? And of those incarcerated, what percentage will be sentenced to decades or years in prison rather than months in jail?

And the failure or refusal to arrest, prosecute, convict, and imprison over 95% of those who committed all these murders and shootings will result in myriads of other violent and mala in se crimes, including aggravated assaults, muggings, armed robberies, burglaries, acts of vandalism, home invasions, abductions, rapes, gang-rapes, and murders committed against men and women who aren’t criminals and are thus innocent victims.

And what percentage are these brutes and savages are young men ages 13-17 who are absurdly defined as “children” and even “little boys.” But if a woman teacher engages in coitus and/or fellatio or even a single act of ‘sexual contact” with one of these violent predators, she’ll be arrested (I’m certain the arrest rate is over 90% for such intrigues), and prosecuted, convicted, and sentenced to months in jail or years (perhaps even decades) in prison and a lifetime or at least 20-30 years of draconian/Orwellian persecution.

Yes,”anarcho-tyranny” in Illinois. Once again: to call all of this insane is an understatement. It’s beyond insanity.

Beyond Insanity

28 Monday Nov 2016

Posted by in Abigail Simon, Abigail Simon sentence, age of consent, CSA victimology, Kathryn Ronk, Uncategorized, women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters", women as rapists, women sex offenders

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , ,

Every year, in Detroit alone, violent male recidivists who should be in prison commit hundreds of rapes and murders and thousands of aggravated assaults, armed robberies, muggings, shootings, burglaries, acts of vandalism, etc. -in a state in which Abigail Simon was sentenced to 8-25 years in prison and a lifetime of draconian/Orwellian persecution for allowing a biological man of 15 to penetrate her in a factually consensual relationship -assuming she’s lying about his forcing himself on her- and Kathryn Ronk was sentenced to 6-15 years in prison, under a plea-bargain, and a lifetime or at least 20-30 years of quasi-totalitarian supervision for the same nonviolent and victimless and malum prohibitum felony.

And of the recidivists who commit such violent and other mala in se crimes in Detroit and other Michigan cities, what percentage are arrested? And of those arrested, what percentage are prosecuted? And of those prosecuted, what percentage are convicted? And of those convicted, what percentage are incarcerated in prisons and jails? And of those imprisoned, what percentage are sentenced to 8-25 years of enslavement, or 6-15 years under a plea-bargain?

And think of all the time and money that has been and will be wasted investigating, arresting, jailing, prosecuting, convicting, imprisoning, treating, harassing, and supervising Abigail Simon and Kathryn Ronk, first-offenders who’ve never committed a violent or other malum in se crime in their lives and never will and who are not a “threat to society” or to anyone nor even a danger to “re-offend” by having sex with another young man under statutory age.

This isn’t inequity, this isn’t injustice -this is insanity! Actually, to call this insane is an understatement. It’s beyond insanity!

Dorothy Rabinowitz and Philip Jenkins

23 Wednesday Nov 2016

Posted by in "traumatization", Abigail Simon, Abigail Simon sentence, age of consent, Cassandra, CSA victimology, Kathryn Ronk, Melissa Bittner, statutory rape, Uncategorized, women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters", women as rapists, women sex offenders

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , ,

To understand the enslavement and persecution of Abigail Simon, Kathryn Ronk, Melissa Bittner, Cassandra Sorenson-Grohall, Mary Letourneau, and myriads of other victims, male and female, of the jihad against “child sexual abuse,” I suggest you read Dorothy Rabinowitz’s “No Crueler Tyrannies,” a devastating critique of the “ritual sex abuse hoax,” the “mass-molestation” day-care and interfamilial “sex-ring” cases, and Philip Jenkins’ “Moral Panic,” especially those sections that discuss the mass-psychosis and hysteria and “moral panic” and witch-hunt that began in the 1970’s with the feminist crusade against an “epidemic” of “date/acquaintance” rape, and then in the 80’s and 90’s with the cases above in which hundreds of men and women were sentenced to prison for acts of child sexual abuse they not only didn’t commit but which never even happened.

And, despite an end to much or most of the lunacy above, the witch-hunt prevails to this day and shows no signs of abating in the near future if ever in my lifetime, but now with an emphasis on what was once defined and codified as “statutory rape,” i.e. consensual sex between adults and young men and women under statutory age, most sensationally and punitively the media obsession with and legal crucifixion of women teachers who transport biological men under age 18 to sexual paradise. Roughly half of the people on the sex-offender registry, now almost a million and growing steadily, were convicted of engaging in consensual sex-acts with pubescent teenagers under age 16 or even 17 and 18. Of which much more later.

Fantasy and Reality

08 Tuesday Nov 2016

Posted by in "traumatization", Abigail Simon, age of consent, CSA victimology, statutory rape, Uncategorized, women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters", women as rapists, women sex offenders

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , ,

All heterosexual males under age 18 fantasize, weekly or daily or even hourly, of having sex with adult females: actresses, singers, teachers, the woman next door or across the street, women they see in parks, malls, restaurants, downtown, at the beach, concerts, sporting events, in their neighborhoods, etc. But few are lucky enough to have their fantasies realized.

If young men under age 16 or 18 were not virgins when they had sex with adult females who were at least 4-5 years older, if they engaged in coitus or fellatio or whatever with underage girls of comparable age, then they knew exactly what to expect before having sex with adult females. The reason is that such acts are exactly the same whether the female is 15 or 25 or 35 or older. Coitus, for example, feels the same or a bit less or more gratifying, depending on the woman’s vagina and her words and actions during love-making, her appearance, and the environment, e.g., a bedroom with soft music and candle-light as opposed to a parked car on a cold winter or hot summer night.

And if they were virgins before they had sex with adult females, the experience in most cases is just as if not even more pleasurable, physically and psychologically, than they envisaged.

Generally, for a biological man under age 16 or 18 to have sex with an adult woman is more exciting, gratifying, empowering, whether or not he’s a virgin, given her age and experience, than having sex with a girl his age or a bit older or younger. And having sex with an adult woman who is sexy and attractive is more pleasurable, emotionally, than having sex with a girl of 15 or 16 who is not sexy and attractive. And even more so if the woman is ravishing and gorgeous like Debra Lafave and Pamela Rogers or lovely and feminine like Mary Kay Letourneau.

In such intrigues, the paramount reality is not that the “criminal,” the “rapist” and “pedophile” and “child molester,” is an adult who is at least 4-5 years older than her de jure and phantasmal “victim.” The paramount reality is that her “victim” is a pubescent teenager who, biologically as opposed to legally and ideologically, is not a “child” but a man with sexual compulsions, fantasies, impulses, desires, just like men in their 20’s and 30’s and beyond, though far more galvanic, intense, and obsessive than those of old and middle-aged men.

This explains why young men in their teens and 20’s, including those under age 16 or 18 who are defined as “children” and deemed to be “traumatized” and “scarred for life” by consenting to or initiating sex with adult females, commit far more rapes than men in their 30’s and 40’s and beyond.

If biological men under statutory age are “traumatized” and “scarred for life” by having sex with adult females who are at least 4-5 years older, then why aren’t they “traumatized” and scarred for life” by raping and gang-raping adult women in the their 20’s and 30’s and 40’s?

And to ask once again: precisely how does a woman being an adult and at least 4-5 years older magically render the sex “traumatizing” for a young man under age 16 or even 18 who eagerly consents to or aggressively initiates the sex which “traumatizes” him in the psychotic imaginations of CSA victimologists?

Truth from the “Maestro”

05 Saturday Nov 2016

Posted by in "traumatization", Abigail Simon, CSA victimology, statutory rape, Uncategorized, women as rapists, women sex offenders

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , ,

The “Maestro,” commenting at RSOL:

You may not like what I’m about to say but someone needs to start speaking REALITY and not “Law & Order: SVU” lingo…? Here goes…I know there are people who are actually sexually abused. However, that is not the case with most of the sex “offenses” that people are on the registry for. If you watch the local and national news when people are arrested for sex offenses, 9 times out of 10 it’s a consensual relationship between an older person and a person a year of so shy of legal age of consent. It’s also a lot of legal age of consent students having relationships with teachers and because the older person is in a position of “power” the relationship is deemed “illegal.” This is HARDLY “abuse.”

…We never hear from the protected “alleged” victims. We get people speaking for them…I was 15 when I sowed my wild oats with an older woman (legal age here is 16) so technically I’m a “victim.” I enjoyed every moment of it and wanted to do it again but she declined after the one and only time. I do NOT want ANYONE speaking for me saying that I was sexually abused and forever damaged by something that comes NATURAL to ALL animal life (and yes, we ARE a form of animal.)

“There have been plenty of stories of ‘victims’ marrying their so-called ‘abusers’ after the person served their time…” Then he mentions all the young men and women under statutory age “who LIED about their ages and even tried to admit to the courts that it was their own fault and yet the older person was still held accountable and the younger person declared a ‘victim’ who must be ‘protected’ from the accused.

(T)he legal ages of consent are MADE UP by lawmakers. It’s not something made by any “higher power”…The people who made these laws can easily change them. They can bring the legal age up or down by a year or two. Here in Connecticut the legal age is 16. Cross the state line into New York and suddenly the legal age is 17.

I once read a news article about a couple who was…married or engaged…The female was 16 (the legal age in their state) and the male was 20+ or so. The moved to another state for his job and her future college…Well…the state they moved to had a high age of consent law so guess what happened…They found out and he got arrested. And she was considered a “victim” in a relationship that was already existing in their home state…My idea of “abuse” is not a consensual relationship with a post-pubescent teenager…(nationalrsol.org. 9-23-2016.)