Category Archives: women as rapists

Alliances of Enemies

24 Friday Jun 2016

Posted by in Abigail Simon, age of consent, CSA victimology, statutory rape, Uncategorized, women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters", women as rapists, women sex offenders

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , ,

The United States is sui generis in its lunacy and hysteria over sex between young men and women under age 16 or even 18 and adults at least 4-5 years older, especially those in positions of authority, and distinctly cruel and extreme and fanatical in punishing those adults as if they were as execrable and dangerous as violent rapists who brutalize and terrorize their victims and pedophiles who rape and serially molest prepubertal children, largely because of an “unholy alliance” of the anti-sex feminist left and the anti-sex Christian right.

Feminists and CSA victimologists, virtually all of whom are feminists and left-liberals and sexual egalitarians, have succeeded in criminalizing as felonies all sex-acts they deem “non-consensual” and in making all such crimes “gender-neutral,” including acts of “intercourse” (defined under the laws of most states as not only coitus but also fellatio and other sex-acts that involve “penetration,” however slight, of vagina and rectum by lips and tongue and fingers and various “toys” and nonhuman objects) and “sexual contact” between young men and women under age 16 or even 18 and adults at least 4-5 years older in factually consensual relationships, even if the “victims” are the aggressors and initiators of their de jure and phantasmal and theoretical “victimization.”

And the anti-sex Christian right, fundamentalists/evangelicals and other puritans and moral traditionalists -who no longer have the power to criminalize as felonies or even misdemeanors all sex-acts outside of marriage and punish and incarcerate homosexuals, lesbians, adulterers, fornicators, and other deviants, and don’t even have the power and influence to stop the legalization of homosexual marriage in all 50 states and the expansion of “transgender rights” and so forth- can nevertheless join the feminist left they abhor and oppose in inflicting draconian and Orwellian “justice” on adult men and women who have love affairs and trysts and “one-night stands” with biological men and women under statutory age.

And in explaining the unique hysteria and lunacy and fanaticism over adult females, especially teachers, transporting biological men under age 18 to sexual paradise, the hysterical anti-sex feminist left and anti-sex Christian right are joined by MRAs, the misogynist lunatics and zealots of the soi-disant “men’s movement,” who are obsessed with proving that females are as bad or worse than males and with turning men and boys into the victims of women and, consequently, are the loudest and craziest voices in demonizing and vilifying women and especially teachers as “rapists” and “pedophiles” for allowing young men under statutory age to penetrate them in de facto consensual relationships.

So pathological and virulent and obsessive is their hatred of women and lust for vengeance that they’re willing to destroy the lives of myriads of male first-offenders convicted of a nonviolent and usually victimless and quintessential malum prohibitum crime, men who’ve never committed a violent or malum in se felony in their lives and almost surely never will and are rarely a “threat to society” or to anyone or even a threat to re-offend by having sex with another underage adolescent girl, in order to destroy the lives of a far lesser number of women who transport young men under age 18 to sexual paradise.

A Juror Responds

23 Thursday Jun 2016

Posted by in Abigail Simon, CSA victimology, plea-bargain, sex offender registry, Uncategorized, women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters", women as rapists, women sex offenders

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , ,

A juror writes:

She was given several far less severe plea bargains, some of which did not even include time in prison. She denied these. Some of her texts to this boy said things along the lines of “We will name our child after her,” referring to the teen’s recently deceased sister. This woman was guilty and she had an easy way out and did not take it.

Yes, an “easy way out,” a “slap on the wrist,” a short vacation in a “country-club” jail, and then she’d be free, “free as a bird,” free to live a normal life. Such is the view of most people, ignorant and callous and obdurate, who’ve never served a week or even a day or hour in jail and know little or nothing about sex-crime laws and punishments.Yes, in hindsight, she should have accepted the final plea-bargain, but it was far from being “an easy way out” or “slap on the wrist” but rather “the lesser of two evils” and nightmares.

To repeat: the media-coverage of this case was/is simply dreadful, tendentious and hysterical as an agent of CSA victimology, combined with a dearth of facts, concrete and specific and thorough. They don’t even tell us what crime she was supposed to plead guilty to and whether it was a felony or misdemeanor.Or if crimes, whether they were felonies or misdemeanors, or both. Exactly what did this plea-bargain, the final one she rejected, entail? (And what of all the others?) They don’t even specify whether she’d have been released after 5-months, unconditionally, irrespective of her conduct, or whether the deal included a sentence of “only” a year in jail with the possibility of release after “only” 5-months for “good behavior.”

An “easy way out”: at least 5-months and possibly a year in a hellish and hellishly overcrowded jail; mandatory “sex-offender treatment,” punitive and debasing, both in jail and for who knows how many years after her release; who knows how many years of quasi-totalitarian post-incarceration supervision, restrictions on her freedoms and intrusions into her private life that don’t apply to violent and/or recidivist criminals who’ve never been convicted of a sexual offense; electronic parole monitoring with an ankle-tether/”bracelet”(?), and registration for life (or at least 20-30 years) as a uniquely execrable and dangerous criminal: her name, mug-shot, and address on the internet, in Michigan’s and national sex-offender registries, so myriads of people who hate her and were enraged by her lenient sentence, her “slap on the wrist,” could harass and vilify her with a torrent of hate-mail and death-threats, and vigilantes could revile and harass her in person and, possibly, vandalize her property and/or even assault or murder her. All it takes is one lunatic, of which there are legions, to blight and destroy a life in ways that go beyond how the lives of SO are blighted and destroyed by government persecution. I suggest one visit the RSOL website and spend at least a few hours reading some of the articles and many of the comments as to what its like to be on the sex-offender registry.

So the plea-bargain she abjured with it’s “slap on the wrist” and “easy way out” was almost surely a life-sentence of draconian/Orwellian persecution, persecution not only by government, wholly gratuitous in respect to Abigail and myriads of other men and women, but also by haters, perverted and inflamed by the media and its lies and canards and histrionics and sensationalism, and/or MRAs, and possibly even obsessed with revenge for the “victims” and intent on exacting “vigilante justice.”

 

 

 

 

Have You No Shame, “Super” Shyster?

12 Sunday Jun 2016

Posted by in Abigail Simon, age of consent, CSA victimology, lawsuit, statutory rape, Uncategorized, women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters", women as rapists, women sex offenders

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , ,

Grand Rapids, MI -The 15-year-old victim of sexual assault by Catholic school tutor Abigail Simon is 18 now and has filed a lawsuit seeking at least $25,000 from Simon, the private school system, the diocese and several administrators.

The now 18-year-old graduate of Catholic Central High School is represented by Detroit-based Ven Johnson -a so-called “super lawyer” and one-time partner of Geofrey Fieger…

Johnson says the goal of the suit is to bring the diocese out of the dark-ages” when it comes to the sexual abuse of students, including male students, by staff or teachers. “You cannot do this to children and pretend not to notice,” Johnson said, adding that in such cases as these the Catholic Church has tried to “ignore them and sweep them under the rug.” (An allusion to the “priestly pedophilia scandal” and mass-hysteria of the 1990s, M.K.)

The suit alleges the school district and the Roman Catholic Diocese of Grand Rapids did know and or should have known about the six-month sexual liaison between the teen and the $50,000 per-year athletic tutor in 2013.

The new lawsuit accuses Simon…of battery and emotional distress as a result of her criminal actions. “Simon’s conduct in this case is so outrageous in character, and so extreme in degree, as to go beyond all possible limits of decency and is to be regarded as atrocious and utterly intolerable in a civilized community,” the suit opines.

The 18-year-old star athlete in high school was briefly on the roster for a MAC conference university until Johnson says he was forced to drop out due to anxiety, depression, psychological pain and suffering, freight and shock and embarrassment, humiliation and mortification. The suit claims that the teen has diminished earning capacity as a result of his trauma. “It absolutely screws up these young people,” Johnson said. (Barton Deiters, “Teen sex assault victim files lawsuit against tutor, Catholic schools, diocese,” mlive.com., 12-2-2015.

Is he a liar, willing to say anything -no matter how execrable, ludicrous, idiotic, deranged, outrageous, chimerical, grossly exaggerated, demonstrably false- to win a case. Or does he actually believe this nonsense, this grotesque, howling, psychotic nonsense, the title of a post in which I quote Harris Mirkin.

If so, he’s psychotic, totally delusional, completely impervious to and estranged from objective reality, as are all CSA victimologists, and the tens of millions of people they’ve indoctrinated, in respect to all liaisons between young men under age 16 or even 18 and adult women at least 4-5 years older, factually consensual sex in which the “victim” is often if not usually the aggressor and initiator of his phantasmal and theoretical “victimization, which may well have been true in this case even if Abigail is lying about his forcing himself on her. And MRAs, the misogynist vermin of the soi-disant “men’s movement,” who are obsessed with adult women, especially teachers, “raping” young men under age 18, and the millions of men and who knows how many women they’ve poisoned with their toxic melange of woman-hatred and mindless egalitarianism.

Abigail Simon and the End of “Civilization” in Michigan.

04 Saturday Jun 2016

Posted by in Abigail Simon, age of consent, CSA victimology, lawsuit, statutory rape, Uncategorized, women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters", women as rapists, women sex offenders

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , ,

“Simon’s conduct in this case is so outrageous in character, and so extreme in degree, as to go beyond all possible limits of decency and is to be regarded as atrocious and utterly intolerable in a civilized community,” the suit opines.

This lawsuit would be risible if it weren’t so hateful and pernicious, so outrageous, atrocious, intolerable, and extreme in its lies and delusions, so inimical to honesty, realism, decency, fairness.

Johnson lives in Detroit, not in the city, I’m sure, but rather in a mansion in one of the most affluent suburbs.The headline from Forbes: “America’s Most Dangerous Cities: Detroit Can’t Shake NO. 1 Spot.” To quote from the article’s first sentence, “…the Motor City once again tops Forbes’ list of America’s Most Dangerous Cities. (Daniel Fisher, 10-29-2015.)

I checked out the crime statistics for Detroit at citydata.com: 

In 2006, there were 418 murders, 593 rapes, 7240 robberies, 13,143 assaults, 18,134 burglaries, 21,287 thefts, and 22,917 auto thefts. In 2012, there were 386 murders, 441 rapes, 4843 robberies, and 9341 assaults. In 2013, the last year for crime statistics, there were 316 murders, 618 rapes, 4774 robberies, and 8796 assaults.

In Flint, Abigail’s “home town” apparently, pop. 99,763, there were 63 murders, 108 rapes, 673 robberies, and 1930 assaults in 2012. In 2013, there were 48 murders, 145 rapes, 447 robberies, and 1267 assaults.

In Grand Rapids, the city in which she committed her abhorrent and unspeakable crimes and was sentenced to 8-25 years in prison and a lifetime of sex offender registration and electronic parole monitoring, there were 16 murders, 46 rapes, 462 robberies, and 941 assaults in 2012. In 2013, there were 17 murders, 82 rapes, 471 robberies, and 756 assaults.

And “civilization” came to an end in Michigan in 2013 when Abigail had a love affair with a biological man of 15 -assuming she’s lying about his raping and terrorizing her- whose pleasure, realization of his “fantasy,” and love for Abigail were turned into a nightmare by the law and criminal justice system. And the media.

  • “Hateful” not only in inducing hatred of Abigail that might endanger her life both in prison and when and if she’s released but also as deserving the hatred and contempt of those who aren’t CSA victimologists, their myrmidons and votaries in the mass- media, law, politics, education, etc., and the tens of millions of  people in the United States alone, females more than males sans MRAs, the misogynist zealots of the soi-disant “men’s movement,” they’ve poisoned and propagandized.

Cassandra Sorenson-Grohall

23 Monday May 2016

Posted by in Abigail Simon, Cassandra, Uncategorized, women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters", women as rapists, women sex offenders

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

,

I don’t know if Abigail Simon is telling the truth in claiming that her “victim” was not only the aggressor in their intrigue but also forced himself on her and in testifying that she didn’t want to have sex with him and that the purpose of her responding to hundreds of his emails and text-messages was to keep him away from her.

But it seems that almost everyone, apart from her family and friends(?), thinks she’s lying about everything, even those who think her sentence is an outrage and travesty and, consequently, are largely or partially sympathetic. With one exception, all the people whose comments I’ve read not only think but know that she’s lying albeit I’m sure few of them attended the trial, the sentencing, the pretrial hearing, etc., or perused the transcripts. Their views are derived, with some exceptions, wholly from the media coverage, whose biases in favor of the “victim” and “child” and against the accused I will discuss in some detail later.

I would have to read the trial transcript, the sentencing transcript, the pretrial hearing transcripts, etc, and interview people who knew her and/or the “victim,” before I decided if it was more likely she was lying or telling the truth. Most likely, given all the facts, I’d conclude that her story, the basis of her appeal, is a mixture of truths and falsehoods. And so, too, with her “victim.”

But in regard to the “he said/she said” testimony, the only certainty is that the “child” and “victim” is a liar who either committed perjury when he testified at a pretrial hearing that he was the aggressor who forced himself on Abigail or when he testified at trial that she was the initiator and that the sex was consensual (in respect to her actions, of course, since a “child” of 15 is too young to consent to or knowingly initiate sex with an adult). As for the hundreds of texts and emails they exchanged -without which she might not have been convicted on “three counts of first-degree criminal sexual conduct- I will soon argue, in some length in another post, that this evidence is actually more exculpatory than inculpatory, and explain why it makes her claims more rather than less credible, unless there are things I don’t know and will never know.

Even if I read all the court transcripts, interviewed dozens of people, etc., I could only surmise and form an idea based on facts and logic as to what really or probably happened. I don’t know what occurred, exactly or generally. And never will know. Unlike those who are 100% certain that she’s lying about everything, I’m not omniscient. I can’t read minds. But given the cases of Melissa Bittner and Cassandra Sorenson-Grohall, both in Milwaukee from 1996-2002 and who knows how many similar cases of which I’m unaware, it’s possible that Abigail is telling the truth about her “victim” being the aggressor who forced himself on her, if not as a whole then largely or essentially with some half/partial-truths and exaggerations/embellishments. With Melissa and Cassandra, unlike Abigail, I know that they were harassed, molested, and sexually assaulted by their “victims.” And Cassandra was also raped.

On April 7, 1997, Cassandra was sentenced to 4-years in prison for having sex with a criminal of 15 who initiated the “affair” by raping her and then sustained it by threats and manipulation, apparently. And at school, as a prelude to forcing himself on her when she visited him at his home on school business, obviously when no one else was present, he constantly harassed her, hounded her, implored her for sex, molested her, kissed her against her will.. I don’t know if she reported all or most or any of these “incidents” to school authorities. But if she did, little or nothing was done to punish or discipline her tormentor or create a situation in which she’d be protected from his assaults and importunities.

The MJS reporter doesn’t describe the assault at the “victim’s” home in any detail, concrete and specific. But at sentencing, addressing a clearly unsympathetic judge, her lawyer repeatedly called the assault “rape” and noted that her “victim” might have been waived into adult court” had she reported the crime to police. Idealistic and compassionate, she didn’t report the rape lest her assailant “would go to prison and become more of a delinquent” and she didn’t end the intrigue that followed because she didn’t know “how to stop it without hurting him.” In a letter she wrote me from prison, she described her “crime” as a “mistake made out of overcaring and naivete.” She also told me that two psychologists (apparently for the defense and thus capable of objectivity and independence) concluded that she was not a “sexual predator” nor a “threat to society and children” and that the intrigue was not a “sexually-motivated crime but one manipulated by the victim.”

But despite all of this and who knows what other “mitigating factors,” a loathsome and/or craven judge sentenced her to 4-years in prison. And, unlike myriads of violent recidivists, she was denied “discretionary parole,” release from prison after serving 1/4 of her nominal sentence, and was thus enslaved for almost 3-years in a country in which, during the 1990s, the average time-served for murder was less than 6-years and the average time-served for all violent crimes was approximately 4-years.

Mandatorily released from prison after 32-months, she was subjected to years of “active community supervision.” Because she acquiesced to sex with a criminal and biological man under age 18 who raped and molested her in a liaison that wasn’t “sexually-motivated” but “manipulated” by a de jure and theoretical “victim” who wasn’t prosecuted for his sexual assaults, she was judged a dire threat to every child in Milwaukee, the adjacent suburbs, the state of Wisconsin, all of the U.S., and the entire world. Thus she couldn’t go shopping, see a doctor, visit friends, travel to other cities and states and countries, and do sundry other things in public and private without the permission of her parole agent.

And everyone convicted of “second-degree sexual assault,” irrespective of the facts and circumstances, must register her life as a uniquely monstrous, execrable, and dangerous criminal, unlike stereotypical criminals who’ve committed murders and other violent and mala in se crimes but who’ve never been convicted of a sexual offense. And because she is classified as level-3 offender, the worst of the worst, theoretically as deviant and dangerous as violent rapists who terrorize and brutalize and kidnap and murder their victims and men (including underage adolescents) who prey on and rape and/or serially molest prepubescent girls and boys, her name, mugshot, and address will be on the internet, accessible to everyone, until she passes from this world in her 70’s or 80’s or 90’s or 100’s. So even her “victim,” assuming he’s not dead or buried in prison, can go online, see her address, and possibly visit her some warm summer night.

To call all of this insane is an understatement. It’s beyond insanity.

* She was convicted of the offense above, a felony with a maximum sentence of 20-years in prison, in a plea-bargain. She was initially charged with “repeated sexual assaults of the same child,” theoretically a more serious crime with a maximum sentence of 40-years in prison.

 

Kirk Douglas was “Raped” by his Teacher

12 Thursday May 2016

Posted by in Abigail Simon, CSA victimology, Debra Lafave, Uncategorized, women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters", women as rapists, women sex offenders

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , ,

Kirk Douglas fondly recalls an affair with his teacher: “I had been a ragamuffin kid of 15 coping with a neighborhood filled with gangs. Under my teacher’s guidance, I became a different person. I’m eternally grateful. By today’s standards, she would have gone to jail. I had no idea we were doing something wrong. Did she?”

It’s understandable why a young man of 15 wouldn’t feel and think that something so pleasurable, so natural, so exciting. so gratifying, so empowering was “wrong.” And, obviously, given such feelings (even assuming he did feel it was “wrong” because of moral and religious inculcation), he didn’t think he was a victim of “rape” and CSA who was “traumatized,” devastated, and “scarred for life.”

What of his teacher? It’s likely she thought it was “wrong” in the sense of it being “inappropriate” and unprofessional. But perhaps she didn’t even think that. And I’m certain she didn’t think it was “wrong”in the sense of being aberrant and unnatural and/or egregiously immoral and transgressive. And, even more so, I’m sure she didn’t think it was “wrong” in the sense that she was a “rapist” and “pedophile” and “child molester,” and that her lover was a victim of “rape” and CSA who was “traumatized” and “scarred for life.”

And it’s likely that she knew or feared she was guilty of a “moral’s offense,” however defined, but wasn’t unduly worried since there was little chance of anyone knowing or suspecting they were having sex and telling school officials or calling the police.

But today, almost surely, she’d be arrested, prosecuted, convicted of a felony or felonies, and sentenced to anywhere from 6-12 in jail, if lucky, to 10-30 years in prison; to years of punitive “sex offender treatment,” both in jail or prison and after her release; years of quasi-totalitarian post-incarceration supervision; and registration for life as a uniquely monstrous and dangerous criminal. And she’d be vilified as a “sexual predator,” “child molester,” “pedophile,” and “rapist” with no penis, and Douglas would be viewed and defined as the “victim” of a traumatic and life-destroying violation even if he told the authorities and all else that he enjoyed the sex and was a willing participant -because this was his actual experience, incredulously, in contrast to the delusions of CSA victimologists.

Now, apparently, Douglas knows their affair was “wrong.” But does he think it should have been a felony as it is today and since the 1970’s or even a misdemeanor? Does he think his teacher and women like Mary Letourneau, Debra Lafave, Cassandra Sorenson-Grohall, Melissa Bittner, Abigail Simon, and many others are “rapists” and “pedophiles” who should be charged with felonies and sentenced to months in jail or years in prison and all the extra/post-incarceration punishments? It would be fascinating to read or hear his opinions in an interview in a magazine or on national television.

Ironically and paradoxically, in respect to intrigues and dalliances between young men under age 18 and adult females, above all teachers, the America of today and of the last 20-years is far more repressive, draconian, hysterical, irrational, delusional, and inquisatorial than the America of Douglas’s youth, the “good-old-days” or “bad-old-days,” depending on one’s values and politics and weltanschauung.

Savor the irony, the poetic injustice, if you will: without her guidance, he might have ended up dead or buried in prison rather than going on to become a rich and famous and legendary actor, one of the most feted and iconic of all the great movie stars of the post World-War II era. Not only did she turn him into a “different person,” not only did she enrich his life morally and artistically and intellectually, not only did she give him the sex that he craved and  enjoyed and fondly remembers, she might have even saved his life. But if they had such an affair today or in the 1990’s, her life would be blighted -profoundly, tragically, hellishly- if not utterly destroyed. She would be branded with the “new-age” scarlet letter, figuratively, until she died. She would never be free again. Unlike her “victim,” she’d be traumatized, devastated, and scarred for life.

 

 

 

“I would have been thrilled….”

05 Thursday May 2016

Posted by in CSA victimology, Debra Lafave, John Derbyshire, Debra Lafave, Uncategorized, women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters", women as rapists, women sex offenders

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , ,

At least I’m not the only one still living in the real world as opposed to the fantasy world of CSA victimologists, the mass-media and its “experts” and pundits and “talking-heads,” MRAs, and the tens of millions of people they’ve brainwashed in full or essentially. Or terrorized and browbeat into silence or affected concurrence? John Derbyshire states the facts and notes the obvious and tells the truth as to how biological men ages 13-17 react to and experience acts of coitus and fellatio with adult women and especially those as ravishing and voluptuous as Debra Lafave:

Miscreant of the month: Debra Lafave, the 25-year-0ld Florida schoolteacher who was charged with sexual molestation for having got intimate with a 14-year-old student. Now, Miss Lafave did a wrong thing, no doubt, and should be…booted out of the teaching profession for good. Still, there was something distinctly odd about the news coverage of the story. What was odd was, the constant implication -I don’t recall anyone having the nerve to say it out loud, but it was there in all the coverage, just under the surface -that this was just like a 25-year-old male teacher doing the same thing to a 14-year-old female student.

Well, I’m sorry, but it isn’t. Not only is the Lafave case  not just like that, it isn’t anything like that. Ms. Lafave is a very pretty young woman. I was a 14-year-old boy myself once. It was a while ago, but I can still remember what it felt like. I would have been thrilled to be seduced by Ms. Lafave, and I would have been the envy of my peers. I would go so far to say that it is the sweetest dream of every red-blooded 14-year-old boy to be seduced by an attractive older woman.

That doesn’t make Ms. Lafave’s actions right, of course, and I am not apologizing for her. It does, though, at least in my mind, cast deep suspicion on claims by (among others) the boy’s parents that he was “traumatized” by the experience. Believe me, gentle reader, there are 14-year-old boys all over America yearning to be so “traumatized.”

That we use the same words -“assault,” “molestation,” even “rape”- for the advances made by a 25-year-old on a 14-year-old male, as we would use for similar advances by a 25-year-old male on a 14-year-0ld female, just shows what a mess we have got ourselves into on the sexual-equality front. Men are not women, and women are not men. That is, of course, a politically-incorrect statement. Gaze on it while you can: soon it will be illegal to utter it. (John Derbyshire, NRO Diary, March 2006.)

One should note that in most of these cases the woman isn’t even guilty of seduction. Either the “victim” was the aggressor and initiator or their sexual union could be described as a mutual coming together, more spontaneous than calculating for both partners.

 

Abigail to be Resentenced

23 Saturday Apr 2016

Posted by in Abigail Simon, appeal, CSA victimology, MRAs, "men's movement, sex offender registry, Uncategorized, women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters", women as rapists, women sex offenders

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , ,

woodtv.com, Dec. 2, 2015:

As for Simon, she is appealing her conviction on several counts. She argues her attorney was ineffective, and the judge gave improper jury instructions that undercut her defense that claimed she was the victim.

The Court of Appeals has not announced whether it will hear Simon’s appeal, however both her her attorney and the Kent County prosecutor’s office say the case should come back to Kent County Court for a sentencing hearing.

In July, the Michigan Supreme Court threw out mandatory sentencing guidelines, ruling judges can use them as a guide but are not bound by them. Since then a number of cases have been sent back to the trial courts for resentencing.

In Simon’s case, the Kent County Prosecutor’s Office writes that the “case should go back too the Circuit Court to determine whether the court would have imposed a materially different sentence but for the essentially mandatory sentencing guidelines.”

Simon’s attorney argues the guidelines were set higher that they should have been under the Supreme Court ruling. Circuit Court judge Paul Sullivan is free to keep the current sentence, or make it shorter or longer.

In a sane and just and rational country, Abigail would not have even been charged with a crime but simply punished, non-criminally, by dismissal and revocation of her license and expulsion from the profession. Or, at worst, charged with a misdemeanor and, if convicted, sentenced to 3-6 months of probation with perhaps 50-100 hours of “community service.” And perhaps also fined modestly. And that’s assuming she’s lying about her “victim” forcing himself on her.

But America is sui generis in its lunacy and hysteria over adult women having sex with biological men under statutory age -especially those in positions of authority even if their authority is not misused to coerce and manipulate their “victims.” Abstractly, in theory and by definition, the authority is presumed to be coercive and manipulative -irrespective of who did what to whom, sexually and non-sexually, and why- and implicitly coercive and manipulative even if the “victim” was the aggressor who initiated his theoretical and phantasmal “victimization,” i.e., the sex he craved, initiated, and enjoyed far more than his de jure “victimizer.” And even if he initiated, sustained, and controlled the intrigue by a scheme of coercion and manipulation. Or even by “sexual assault,” rape and/or molestation, e.g., the “victims” and “crimes” of Melissa Bittner and Cassandra Sorenson-Grohall.

And, though the SC ruling was in July of 2015, I assume she has not been resentenced. Given her 7-weeks in jail before sentencing, she’s now been enslaved for almost a year and a half and might have to wait a few months longer, at least, to find out how many more years she’ll be imprisoned.

And when she’s resentenced, say in 2-3 months, I’m sure the judge won’t let her off with “time-served.” Imagine the reaction if he did so! The fusillade of excoriation, calumny, virulence, hate-mail, death-threats, perhaps even assaults and vandalism. The condemnation from the ruling elites and governing-classes, CSA victimologists, newspapers editorials, pundits, politicians, the national media and it’s “talking-heads,” MRAs, etc. So even though he appears not to be a CSA victimologist, given some of his comments at sentencing, I fear he’s too craven to defy the mob and elites and choose sanity and equity over politics and ideology.

Thus, almost surely, a sentence of “only “4 or 5 or 6 years in prison, hopefully with “time-served,” though I doubt it, or perhaps 4-8 years with a chance for parole after “only” 4 or 6 years. If she’s given 6 years, for example, she’ll be enslaved for almost as long as under the initial sentence of 8-25 years, assuming she would have been released after “only” 8 years. And if given 4-8 and denied parole after 4 or 6 years, she’ll be enslaved almost as long or longer than under the first sentence, assuming once again that she’d have been released after 8 years.

And conceivably longer than 6 years if he reads a copy of the lawsuit or attends a hearing and believes all or most of the allegations. During sentencing in January 2015, he concluded that she was not a “predator” who was likely to “re-offend.  Given the lawsuit and it’s allegations (lies, distortions, half-truths, exaggerations?), he might change his mind and view her as a “predator” who is likely to “re-offend,” resulting in an even more draconian sentence. And so, too, if he submits to the demands of CSA victimologists, MRAs, and the tens of millions of people they’ve brainwashed, provoking in millions a frenzy of hatred and “blood lust” for vengeance.

And the resentencing, whatever his ruling, won’t vacate or lessen any of the extra/post-incarceration penalties.

 

Abigail is Sued by Her “Victim”

22 Friday Apr 2016

Posted by in Abigail Simon, CSA victimology, lawsuit, Uncategorized, women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters", women as rapists, women sex offenders

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , ,

The insanity continues. The State of Michigan and it’s laws and courts and judges and lawyers simply can’t torture and torment this harmless woman enough, a woman who claims that the “victim” who is now an adult and is suing her was the aggressor in their intrigue and forced himself on her. For his mother, hysterical and vindictive, who probably initiated the lawsuit after finding out that Abigail would be re-sentenced due to a Michigan Supreme Court ruling, years in prison, at least, and a lifetime of draconian/Orwellian persecution, is not vengeance and punishment enough. I quote from an online article entitled “Victim Sues Abigail Simon, Diocese of GR,” Dec. 2, 2015, that includes a large photo of the mugshot that is featured in Michigan’s and national sex offender registries:

GRAND RAPIDS, Mich. -The victim of Abigail Simon has filed a lawsuit against his former tutor, the Catholic Diocese of Grand Rapids, Grand Rapid Catholic Schools and three staff members…The lawsuit, filed in Kent County 17th Circuit Court Nov. 20, accuses Simon of battery and intentional infliction of emotional distress…The victim, who is not being named because he is the victim of a sex crime, also claims in his lawsuit that in February 2013 Abigail Simon “also engaged in inappropriate sexual and physical contact with other male students at Catholic Central and/or Grand Rapids West Catholic High School.”…The suit claims that the teachers and diocese knew of Simon’s sexual behavior toward underage male students in early 2013 and no one took action to stop the behavior. (woodtv.com/2015/12/02.)

“Battery and intentional infliction of emotional distress” for transporting a biological man and volcano of testosterone to sexual paradise in a factually consensual relationship that the definitional “victim” probably initiated, and that’s assuming she’s lying about his raping and terrorizing her. “Battery” denotes violence. If there was any violence, literally defined, in this relationship, it was committed by the “victim” against Abigail if she’s telling the truth about his being the aggressor in their intrigue and forcing himself on her.

Unsurprisingly, the article offers no specific and concrete facts as to exactly what is meant by “inappropriate sexual and physical contact with other male students” and “Simon’s sexual behavior toward underage male students” -but this vagueness and refusal to give us details implies that she had affairs and engaged in acts of coitus and fellatio and who knows what else with other male students at two different high schools.

If most or all of this is true, whatever it means exactly, it surely would have been discovered in full or largely during the investigation of her liaison with the football star.The SVU detectives and prosecutors must have interviewed dozens of students and teachers and other people at length and perused all of Abigail’s emails and text-messages during an exhaustive and thorough investigation.

If most or all of this is true, she would have been charged with who knows how many more felonies against who knows how many more “victims,” and there would have been dozens of witnesses to corroborate the accusations of the “victims.” Once again, no facts, concrete and specific much less thoroughness, from the media. But if she had engaged in acts of coitus and fellatio or even kissing and the fondling of genitals and breasts while fully clothed and other acts of “sexual contact” as opposed to “intercourse,” she would have been charged with who knows how many “counts” of “first-degree criminal sexual conduct” against who knows how many more “underage male students.”

And if she had even tried to seduce or initiate sex with other male students, or even engaged in explicit sexual banter and flirting at school and/or initiated and responded to texts and emails that were erotic or suggestive in nature with other male students, she would have been charged with who knows how many counts of “accosting a minor for immoral purposes,” a felony under Michigan law, against who knows how many “victims.”

Given all this evidence, all these “victims” and other witnesses, she obviously would not have rejected many or even one plea-bargain. She would have had no choice but to plead guilty. There would have been no trial.

If I had been a Juror at Abigail’s Trial

20 Wednesday Apr 2016

Posted by in Abigail Simon, CSA victimology, sex offender registry, Uncategorized, women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters", women as rapists, women sex offenders

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, ,

If I had been in the “jury pool,” and had answered the questions of the prosecutors and defense attorneys honestly, there’s absolutely no chance that I would have been one of the 12 people chosen to decide Abigail Simon’s fate. But let’s assume that I lied, convincingly and astutely, to deceive the prosecutors, and was one of the 12 jurors.

If so, even if after hearing all the evidence I was 100% certain that Abigail was lying about everything, I would still have voted “not guilty” on all counts as a defiant and rational act of nullification, resulting in a “hung jury,” to protest the insane and odious laws under which she was arrested and prosecuted, convicted at trial, and sentenced to  8-25 years in prison and a lifetime of draconian/Orwellian persecution.

And to protest the zeitgeist that is culpable for these draconian, irrational, gratuitous, Kafkaesque laws: the unprecedented mass-psychosis and hysteria and “moral panic” and witch-hunt that began in 1997 with the burning and lynching, metaphorically, of Mary Letourneau, transformed by the media into the most hated and notorious distaff sex criminal in American history, and provoked the demonization and witch-burning of Abigail Simon almost two decades later: a corollary of the fantasies and fanaticism of CSA victimologists, their myrmidons and votaries in the mainstream media, and the tens of millions of people they’ve browbeat and indoctrinated, including those with the power to destroy the lives of innocuous and often innocent men and women who’ve never committed a violent or malum in se crime in their lives and almost surely never will and are not a ” threat to society” or to anyone: politicians, police, prosecutors, judges, jurors.

First, at the onset of deliberations, I would have shocked and enraged all or most of the other 11 jurors by stating that I would vote “not guilty” on all charges for the reasons above and that I would not change my mind no matter what any of them said since my decision was based on equity and altruism and not the evidence and testimony.

Nevertheless, knowing my efforts would be futile, I would have tried to persuade them to free Abigail by voting “not guilty” on all charges by invoking the presumption of innocence and the standard of “proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.”

I would have reminded them, repeatedly and emphatically, that in respect to the “he-said/she-said” testimony, the only certainty was that the “child” was a liar who committed perjury either at trial or when he testified under oath at a pretrial hearing that he was not only the aggressor in their intrigue but also forced himself on Abigail..

And I would have argued that the hundreds of emails and texts messages they exchanged were actually more exculpatory than inculpatory. They made her story more rather than less credible..See my post on why she rejected the plea bargain. Perhaps because she was telling the truth if not as a whole then largely and essentially.

And I would have argued, doggedly and forcefully, that this reality, combined with Abigail’s testimony as to why and how she responded to his fusillade of emails and text messages -and who knows what else I would have heard if a juror at her trial?- should be construed as a “reasonable doubt.”

And I would have stared at each juror, intensely and menacingly, my eyes like lasers, and asked them if a woman like Abigail, even if guilty, deserved to be sentenced to at least 8-25 years in prison and perhaps 25-years to life and enslaved for at least 8-years if not much longer in a hellish prison and then subjected to a lifetime of draconian/Orwellian persecution.

Almost surely, I would not have succeeded in convincing even one or two of my “fellow jurors” that Abigail should be acquitted on all counts because she was not “proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt” much less that they should join me in a defiant act of jury nullification.  She would not have been exonerated. But she would not have been convicted, not with me as a juror, and I would have lived the rest of my life knowing that I was not one of 12 jurors who destroyed the life of a harmless and perhaps innocent women. Alas, she would have been tried again, almost surely convicted, and sentenced to at least 8-25 year in prison and all the other extra/post-incarceration punishments. But at least I would have been in no way responsible.

And, surely, I would have been interviewed, by a few or at least one reporter, so I could have explained, in response to their questions, incredulous and acrimonious, why I voted “not guilty.” And, hopefully, they would have quoted me at length, accurately, though I doubt it. I would have been excoriated, subjected to a barrage of hate mail and death threats, possibly even a victim of assault and/or vandalism, if my identity was disclosed. But I would have been proud of myself for having the sanity and courage to resist this lunacy and mass-hysteria, so proud.