Category Archives: age of consent

Kathryn Ronk: Crucified Because Her Family and Friends Didn’t Mention the “Victim.”

30 Tuesday Aug 2016

Posted by in "traumatization", age of consent, CSA victimology, Kathryn Ronk, sex offender registry, statutory rape, Uncategorized, women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters", women as rapists, women sex offenders

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , ,

At sentencing, in a black-and-white unisex jumpsuit and handcuffs attached to a waist-chain and leg-irons, deferring to the advice of her lawyer and others, she played her assigned role in this ritual of atonement and degradation, acknowledging the heinousness of her crimes and expressing remorse, sincerely or insincerely, and apologizing to her “victim,” a biological man of 15 whom she transported to sexual paradise in a factually consensual relationship.

All for nothing, nothing but an exercise in futility, wishful-thinking, and gratuitous mortification -since the judge, doubtless a feminist and left-liberal and CSA victimologist, fanatical and dogmatic, imposed the maximum sentence of 6-15 years in prison for third-degree criminal sexual conduct. And one of her reasons for doing so was that none of the letters and emails the judge received from family and friends calling for “mercy” for a woman who never committed a violent or other malum in se crime in her life and never will and is not a “threat to society” or to anyone nor even a danger to “re-offend” by having sex with another young man under statutory age, and whose crimes are legal acts in dozens of other nations, including European countries -not one of them mentioned the “victim”, apparently, or acknowledged and emphasized  his purely imaginary and definitional “traumatization”

Although Oakland County Judge Nanci Grant appreciated Ronk’s apology, she said she’d taken offense at the letters of support that she had received from the defendant’s friends and family.

“I have never seen letters of support for a defendant with nothing about victim,” Grant Said, according to the Detroit News. “They were all about you and what you were going through. Poor you…You did something you shouldn’t have done.”

In calling for “mercy” for Kathryn, and imploring the judge to impose a “lenient” sentence -i.e., “only” 6-12 months in jail or 1-2 years in prison and a lifetime or at least 20-30 years of draconian/Orwellian persecution- perhaps her family and friends didn’t think it wise to speak of a women they loved and liked as a “rapist” and “pedophile” and “child molester,” a species of monster and degenerate, and her lover as a “child” and “victim” of rape and CSA who’ll be “traumatized,” devastated, and “scarred for life.”

Perhaps the reason they didn’t mention the “victim” is because there was no “victim,” factually as opposed to legally, as distinguished from cases of aggravated assault, armed robbery, muggings, home invasions, kidnappings, burglary, vandalism, arson, murder, violent/forcible rape, the sexual assaults of  prepubertal  children, boys and girls, who are too young and immature to consent to sex in a meaningful and comprehending sense. As I’ve explained in scores of articles and blog-posts, the de jure “victim” was not a “child” but a young man of 15 who assented to or initiated sex with his pretty teacher in a de facto consensual relationship.

“Poor you,” the judge sneered at a woman crying and in shackles. Yes, how can people, including her family and friends, be sympathetic toward a “rapist” and “child abuser” and insensitive and apathetic toward a “victim” of “rape” and “child sexual abuse” who’s “traumatized” and “scarred for life” in the imaginations of CSA victimolgists, including this odious and vengeful judge, so callous and cruel that they don’t even mention him and his purely chimerical sufferings.

How can they, including her family and friends, be so callous as not to realize that the travail of a woman they know and love and/or care about, a first-offender convicted of a nonviolent and victimless and malum prohibitum crime, who will be enslaved for at least 6-years if not longer in a hellish prison and then subjected to a lifetime or at least 20-30 years of draconian/Orwellian persecution, including public sex offender registration, is negligible compared to the sufferings of her phantasmal and theoretical “victim,” i.e,  the biological man of 15 she transported to sexual paradise.

It’s possible that at least some of them might agree with me and others I’ve quoted in articles and blog-posts that it’s false and absurd to define such women as “rapists” and “pedophiles” and their lovers as “children” and “victims” whose lives are shattered, profoundly and permanently, by sex they craved and enjoyed far more than their de jure victimizers.

“Blocked” by Barton

15 Monday Aug 2016

Posted by in Abigail Simon, age of consent, Barton Dieters, CSA victimology, Debra Lafave, Uncategorized, women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters", women as rapists

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , ,

On Aug. 1, 2016, I sent this email to four people, including Martin Tieber and Barton Dieters:

In a sane and just and rational country, she would not have even been charged with a crime but simply punished, non-criminally, by dismissal and revocation of her license and expulsion from the profession. All this is more than punishment enough for transporting a biological man of 15 to sexual paradise and “inappropriate”/unprofessional behavior. Imagine what this would entail and how it would blight her life if she couldn’t find another job or was forced to work for the minimum-wage at a fast-food restaurant or wherever. And so forth.

Or, at worst, charged with a misdemeanor and, if convicted, sentenced to 3-6 months of probation and 5-100 hours of “community service,” and perhaps also fined modestly -all of which is not only excessive but gratuitous in respect to “public safety” and deterring and preventing violent and other serious crimes.

No jail, no prison, no “sex-offender treatment (to “treat” her for what exactly, heterosexuality?), no quasi-totalitarian surveillance; no electronic parole monitoring with an ankle tether/”bracelet”; no public sex-offender registration, with her name,  mug-shot, and address on the internet, observable to everyone with access to a computer(s), not only in the U.S. but in the entire world, so myriads of those who hate her can send her hate-mail and death-threats, and, for many, ostracize, revile, harass, and threaten her in person, and, possibly for some or at least a few, vandalize her property and/or even assault or murder her -all this until she dies at age 77 or 84 or 92. I suggest you go to RSOL and read many or some of the articles and comments as to what it’s like to be on the sex-offendeer registry.

8-25 years in prison and a lifetime of draconian/Orwellian persecution for a first-offender convicted of nonviolent and victimless and mala prohibita crimes that are legal acts in dozens of other nations, including European countries; a woman who has never committed a violent or other malum in se crime in her life and never will and is not a “threat to society” or to anyone nor even a danger to “re-offend” by having sex with another young man under statutory age.

And the generic age of consent in Michigan is 16. If he had been 16, just a few months and weeks older, and she had not been his tutor (or had been a tutor at another high school?), their affair would have been legal under Michigan law.

Dieters was so enraged and appalled by what I wrote that he blocked me immediately, so he didn’t read my criticism of him in a second email for which I received an “undeliverable” message:

On this matter, the media (local, state, national) is less a source of neutral and objective news than a tendentious agent of CSA victimology propaganda and inculcation in which all critical/dissenting voices are suppressed, almost as if under a totalitarian regime, or denounced and derided and defamed.

And sensationalism and histrionics for the ratings in the Letourneau, Lafave, Simon, and many other cases, mass-hysteria and “frenzy” over what is in fact a trivial matter that should be covered swiftly and quietly and, in my opinion, shouldn’t even be a crime and surely not a felony.

In covering this story, Dieters was less a reporter than a cheerleader for the prosecution and CSA victimology propagandist. To offer but one of many examples: a reporter who uses the phrase “ex-tutor guilty of raping her student” is not a journalist, neutral and objective, but an activist, ideologue, propagandist, CSA victimologist, who uses language not to describe but rather to distort and pervert objective reality for ideological purposes.

A Misogynist Lunatic, Almost Surely an MRA, Emotes

16 Saturday Jul 2016

Posted by in Abigail Simon, age of consent, CSA victimology, MRAs, "men's movement, Uncategorized, women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters", women as rapists, women sex offenders

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , ,

Bob Pell rages:

FREE? Should get the full 25 years!

He’s omniscient, of course, just like all other hateful commenters, male and female, and is 100% certain she’s lying about everything. Yes, she deserves to be enslaved in a zoo like an animal for at least 25-years because she was convicted of falling in love with a biological man of 15 who loved her and whom she transported to sexual paradise in a country in which, during the 1990s, the decade when the U.S. started to “get tough on crime,” the average-time served for murder (including non-negligent manslaughter) was less than 6-years and the average time-served for all violent crimes (aggravated assault, violent/forcible rape, robbery, homicide) was approximately 4-years.

And one can assume that 90-95% of the males who were sentenced for these crimes were recidivists, most with histories of crime and violence beginning at age 13 or 14 or 15 who should have been buried in prison long before they committed their latest violent felonies. And it’s likely that such averages are even lower and more lenient today after nearly 8-years of rule by Obama and his criminal justice reforms. And since males commit 100% of rapes, 99% (?) of violent sexual assaults, and roughly 90% of nonsexual violent felonies, they’re overwhelmingly the beneficiaries of this systematic leniency.

But through “cherry-picking,” the logical fallacy of confirmation bias, MRAs contend that men are systemically crucified and women are systemically coddled by the criminal justice systems of all states and the federal government. Thus, surely, if Abigail Simon had a penis, she would have been sentenced to the maximum of 25-years to life and would serve at least a quarter of a century in prison just like all male teachers and other men convicted of first-degree criminal sexual conduct in Michigan. To this lunatic misogynist, as for all MRAs, she’s obviously a beneficiary of the putative “double standards” and preferential treatment for women, the “pussy pass,” absurdly decried and derided as “chivalry, that the soi-disant “men’s movement” or “men’s rights movement,” essentially the mirror-image of feminism and the “women’s movement,” denounces tirelessly, virulently, hysterically, psychotically,  highlighting cases which conform to their fantasies of ubiquitous “misandry” and anti-male “sexism” and discrimination, and denying and ignoring those which undermine and contravene this narrative of pervasive male victimization.

As feminism is the ideology of female victimization, so “masculism” is the ideology of male victimization. And biological men under age 18 who crave and enjoy sex with adult women, especially teachers, are symbols of male victimization, proof that women can “rape” men and boys, without having penises, in liaisons in which their victims eagerly consent to or initiate their phantasmal and theoretical victimization.

 

 

A Witch-Burner Emotes

12 Tuesday Jul 2016

Posted by in Abigail Simon, age of consent, CSA victimology, sex offender registry, statutory rape, Uncategorized, women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters", women as rapists, women sex offenders

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , ,

Haida writes:

Abigail was probably the most transparent liar I have ever seen. She looks like a spoiled brat that is used to getting what she wants. The fact that she accused this dumb kid of controlling her, a grown ass woman is bloody laughable. She is gross. Normally I wouldn’t have wanted to see her go to prison, but after that arrogant show she put on for the court, I’m extremely happy she’s sitting in prison now. And I hope it doesn’t go well for her in there.

I know you won’t print this because you’re probably her crazy mom that supported your lying daughter through that trial. Perhaps if you would have told her no once in a while she wouldn’t have grown up to be a narcissistic lying piece of waste.

Dearest Haida,

Yes, I’m Abigail’s “crazy” mother. She’s the author of two books,”The Ideology and Politics of Rape and Child Sexual Abuse,” and “Women as ‘Rapists’ and ‘Pedophiles’: Why Mary Letourneau Served More Time in Prison than the Average Man Convicted of Murder,” neither of which was published, condemning me to a life of poverty. And she wrote these books and is writing posts and articles on this website in the guise of a man with the sobriquet of Michael Kuehl! Michael, yes, but “Kuehl,” a comparatively rare German surname. Given the choice of myriads of surnames, what are the odds she would choose “Kuehl” as a pseudonym?! Talk about “bloody laughable.”

Do you know Abigail and her mother intimately? If not, you must be omniscient, comparable to an all-seeing and all-knowing supranatural being. How else would you know that she was/is an indulgent parent who never said no and so turned her daughter into a “spoiled brat” and “narcissistic lying piece of waste.” (And why single out her mother, and call her “crazy.” I’m sure her father, sisters(?) and brother(?), relatives and friends, etc., also “support” her. Are they all “crazy”?)

Untold myriads of mothers support and love sons who are brutes and savages with histories of crime beginning at age 13 or 14 or 15 who’ve committed dozens of violent and other mala in se felonies, and do so repeatedly and unconditionally; mothers support and love sons who are guilty beyond any doubt of murders and mass-murders that involve kidnappings, home invasions. rape, gang-rape, torture, mutilations, etc., and hope they’re acquitted at trial of all charges so they’re free to commit further atrocities. Mothers support and love sons who are sadists, monsters, lunatics, imbeciles, degenerates, psychopaths. Have you ever called them “crazy,” even one even once, albeit most of them are “crazy” or, to be generous, pathetically and tragically misguided.

Abigail is a highly intelligent, sensitive, educated, and cultured woman who has never committed a violent or other malum in se crime in her life and never will and is not a “threat to society” or to anyone or even a danger to “reoffend” by having sex with another young man under statutory age; a first-offender who was sentenced to  8-25 years in prison and a lifetime of extra/post incarceration penalties for nonviolent and victimless and mala prohibita crimes that are legal acts in dozens of other nations, including European countries.

Whether she’s lying, telling the truth, or telling the truth about some things and lying about others, her sentence is an outrage and travesty, hideously draconian, insanely excessive, and completely gratuitous in preventing and deterring violent and other mala in se felonies. If she’s telling the truth in full or essentially, she was sentenced to 8-25 years in prison and a lifetime of draconian/Orwellian persecution because her “victim” was the aggressor in their sexual intrigue and forced himself on her.  If she’s lying, she was crucified and her life was destroyed for falling in love with a biological man of 15  who loved her and whom she transported to sexual paradise.

And her mother is “crazy” for supporting her!

if not “crazy,” she would have cheered for the prosecution in the hope that her daughter would be convicted on all counts and sentenced to at least 8-25 years in prison and a lifetime of sex-offender registration and electronic parole monitoring. And when she heard the “guilty” verdicts, she would have rejoiced, triumphantly, rather than cried in anguish. And at sentencing, if not crazy, she would have implored the judge to impose the maximum sentence of 25-years to life in prison. If not crazy, she’d be overjoyed that her daughter is enslaved in a zoo like an animal and will be abused and degraded for who knows how many more years and then subjected to a lifetime of quasi-totalitarian surveillance and persecution. She’d be overjoyed that her daughter has to wear an electronic ankle-tether or “bracelet” that she can never remove (by herself, of her own volition) under any circumstances, not when bathing, showering, shaving her legs, having sex, and which can only be removed (by others) when she dies. And that her daughter must register for life as a uniquely deviant and dangerous criminal, her name, mug-shot, and address on the internet, accessible to the public, until she passes from this world at age 77 or 84 or 96 or 102.

A dumb kid” -as if he were 9-years-old and retarded with no sexual compulsions, fantasies, impulses, desires, “kinks,” etc., rather than a 15-year-old biological man, a 6’3″, 220 lb. volcano and hurricane of testosterone at the acme of his erotic powers, 9-inches taller than Abigail and almost a 100 pounds heavier and surely 6-8 times stronger in the upper-body depending on his musculature and bone-density. Why would any “grown ass woman,” as you put it so elegantly, any tutor/teacher, or any little or normal size adult man, conceivably fear such a behemoth, whom I assume you know little or nothing about, or any  biological man under age 18 who is large and muscular and aggressive and often violent and dangerous or potentially so. How many woman teachers, and also male teachers, aren’t afraid of many students, especially young men ages 13-18.

Being omniscient, you know that Abigail is lying about everything. But you and many others, especially women paradoxically, not only know that he didn’t rape her but also seem to be implying that the fear of a “child” and “kid” under age 18 raping or molesting his teacher is absurd and groundless under any circumstances, or virtually any circumstances. Really? just ask all the women teachers, and female students, who’ve been harassed, molested, and raped by male students,especially in large cities, over the last 50 years, including Melissa Bittner and Cassandra Sorenson-Grohall.

Every year, in the real world as opposed to the fantasy world you and millions of other people inhabit, in the U.S. and all other nations and cultures worldwide, biological men ages 13-17 commit millions of rapes and gang-rapes and serious acts of molestation, as in Cologne and other cities in Germany and Sweden and other European countries, overwhelmingly of adult women and underage adolescent girls, including teachers and students, but also prebubertal girls, young men (usually those under age 18), and prepubertal boys. And also millions and millions of other violent and mala in se crimes.

If three “boys” ages 15 and 14 and 13 broke into your home and gang-raped you, penetrating and violating you anally and orally as well as vaginally, for 2-3 hours, I suppose you wouldn’t press charges since they were just “dumb kids” who didn’t know what they were doing and should be released and forgiven, free to rape more women and girls and commit other violent and serious crimes.

Alliances of Enemies

24 Friday Jun 2016

Posted by in Abigail Simon, age of consent, CSA victimology, statutory rape, Uncategorized, women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters", women as rapists, women sex offenders

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , ,

The United States is sui generis in its lunacy and hysteria over sex between young men and women under age 16 or even 18 and adults at least 4-5 years older, especially those in positions of authority, and distinctly cruel and extreme and fanatical in punishing those adults as if they were as execrable and dangerous as violent rapists who brutalize and terrorize their victims and pedophiles who rape and serially molest prepubertal children, largely because of an “unholy alliance” of the anti-sex feminist left and the anti-sex Christian right.

Feminists and CSA victimologists, virtually all of whom are feminists and left-liberals and sexual egalitarians, have succeeded in criminalizing as felonies all sex-acts they deem “non-consensual” and in making all such crimes “gender-neutral,” including acts of “intercourse” (defined under the laws of most states as not only coitus but also fellatio and other sex-acts that involve “penetration,” however slight, of vagina and rectum by lips and tongue and fingers and various “toys” and nonhuman objects) and “sexual contact” between young men and women under age 16 or even 18 and adults at least 4-5 years older in factually consensual relationships, even if the “victims” are the aggressors and initiators of their de jure and phantasmal and theoretical “victimization.”

And the anti-sex Christian right, fundamentalists/evangelicals and other puritans and moral traditionalists -who no longer have the power to criminalize as felonies or even misdemeanors all sex-acts outside of marriage and punish and incarcerate homosexuals, lesbians, adulterers, fornicators, and other deviants, and don’t even have the power and influence to stop the legalization of homosexual marriage in all 50 states and the expansion of “transgender rights” and so forth- can nevertheless join the feminist left they abhor and oppose in inflicting draconian and Orwellian “justice” on adult men and women who have love affairs and trysts and “one-night stands” with biological men and women under statutory age.

And in explaining the unique hysteria and lunacy and fanaticism over adult females, especially teachers, transporting biological men under age 18 to sexual paradise, the hysterical anti-sex feminist left and anti-sex Christian right are joined by MRAs, the misogynist lunatics and zealots of the soi-disant “men’s movement,” who are obsessed with proving that females are as bad or worse than males and with turning men and boys into the victims of women and, consequently, are the loudest and craziest voices in demonizing and vilifying women and especially teachers as “rapists” and “pedophiles” for allowing young men under statutory age to penetrate them in de facto consensual relationships.

So pathological and virulent and obsessive is their hatred of women and lust for vengeance that they’re willing to destroy the lives of myriads of male first-offenders convicted of a nonviolent and usually victimless and quintessential malum prohibitum crime, men who’ve never committed a violent or malum in se felony in their lives and almost surely never will and are rarely a “threat to society” or to anyone or even a threat to re-offend by having sex with another underage adolescent girl, in order to destroy the lives of a far lesser number of women who transport young men under age 18 to sexual paradise.

Have You No Shame, “Super” Shyster?

12 Sunday Jun 2016

Posted by in Abigail Simon, age of consent, CSA victimology, lawsuit, statutory rape, Uncategorized, women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters", women as rapists, women sex offenders

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , ,

Grand Rapids, MI -The 15-year-old victim of sexual assault by Catholic school tutor Abigail Simon is 18 now and has filed a lawsuit seeking at least $25,000 from Simon, the private school system, the diocese and several administrators.

The now 18-year-old graduate of Catholic Central High School is represented by Detroit-based Ven Johnson -a so-called “super lawyer” and one-time partner of Geofrey Fieger…

Johnson says the goal of the suit is to bring the diocese out of the dark-ages” when it comes to the sexual abuse of students, including male students, by staff or teachers. “You cannot do this to children and pretend not to notice,” Johnson said, adding that in such cases as these the Catholic Church has tried to “ignore them and sweep them under the rug.” (An allusion to the “priestly pedophilia scandal” and mass-hysteria of the 1990s, M.K.)

The suit alleges the school district and the Roman Catholic Diocese of Grand Rapids did know and or should have known about the six-month sexual liaison between the teen and the $50,000 per-year athletic tutor in 2013.

The new lawsuit accuses Simon…of battery and emotional distress as a result of her criminal actions. “Simon’s conduct in this case is so outrageous in character, and so extreme in degree, as to go beyond all possible limits of decency and is to be regarded as atrocious and utterly intolerable in a civilized community,” the suit opines.

The 18-year-old star athlete in high school was briefly on the roster for a MAC conference university until Johnson says he was forced to drop out due to anxiety, depression, psychological pain and suffering, freight and shock and embarrassment, humiliation and mortification. The suit claims that the teen has diminished earning capacity as a result of his trauma. “It absolutely screws up these young people,” Johnson said. (Barton Deiters, “Teen sex assault victim files lawsuit against tutor, Catholic schools, diocese,” mlive.com., 12-2-2015.

Is he a liar, willing to say anything -no matter how execrable, ludicrous, idiotic, deranged, outrageous, chimerical, grossly exaggerated, demonstrably false- to win a case. Or does he actually believe this nonsense, this grotesque, howling, psychotic nonsense, the title of a post in which I quote Harris Mirkin.

If so, he’s psychotic, totally delusional, completely impervious to and estranged from objective reality, as are all CSA victimologists, and the tens of millions of people they’ve indoctrinated, in respect to all liaisons between young men under age 16 or even 18 and adult women at least 4-5 years older, factually consensual sex in which the “victim” is often if not usually the aggressor and initiator of his phantasmal and theoretical “victimization, which may well have been true in this case even if Abigail is lying about his forcing himself on her. And MRAs, the misogynist vermin of the soi-disant “men’s movement,” who are obsessed with adult women, especially teachers, “raping” young men under age 18, and the millions of men and who knows how many women they’ve poisoned with their toxic melange of woman-hatred and mindless egalitarianism.

Abigail Simon and the End of “Civilization” in Michigan.

04 Saturday Jun 2016

Posted by in Abigail Simon, age of consent, CSA victimology, lawsuit, statutory rape, Uncategorized, women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters", women as rapists, women sex offenders

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , ,

“Simon’s conduct in this case is so outrageous in character, and so extreme in degree, as to go beyond all possible limits of decency and is to be regarded as atrocious and utterly intolerable in a civilized community,” the suit opines.

This lawsuit would be risible if it weren’t so hateful and pernicious, so outrageous, atrocious, intolerable, and extreme in its lies and delusions, so inimical to honesty, realism, decency, fairness.

Johnson lives in Detroit, not in the city, I’m sure, but rather in a mansion in one of the most affluent suburbs.The headline from Forbes: “America’s Most Dangerous Cities: Detroit Can’t Shake NO. 1 Spot.” To quote from the article’s first sentence, “…the Motor City once again tops Forbes’ list of America’s Most Dangerous Cities. (Daniel Fisher, 10-29-2015.)

I checked out the crime statistics for Detroit at citydata.com: 

In 2006, there were 418 murders, 593 rapes, 7240 robberies, 13,143 assaults, 18,134 burglaries, 21,287 thefts, and 22,917 auto thefts. In 2012, there were 386 murders, 441 rapes, 4843 robberies, and 9341 assaults. In 2013, the last year for crime statistics, there were 316 murders, 618 rapes, 4774 robberies, and 8796 assaults.

In Flint, Abigail’s “home town” apparently, pop. 99,763, there were 63 murders, 108 rapes, 673 robberies, and 1930 assaults in 2012. In 2013, there were 48 murders, 145 rapes, 447 robberies, and 1267 assaults.

In Grand Rapids, the city in which she committed her abhorrent and unspeakable crimes and was sentenced to 8-25 years in prison and a lifetime of sex offender registration and electronic parole monitoring, there were 16 murders, 46 rapes, 462 robberies, and 941 assaults in 2012. In 2013, there were 17 murders, 82 rapes, 471 robberies, and 756 assaults.

And “civilization” came to an end in Michigan in 2013 when Abigail had a love affair with a biological man of 15 -assuming she’s lying about his raping and terrorizing her- whose pleasure, realization of his “fantasy,” and love for Abigail were turned into a nightmare by the law and criminal justice system. And the media.

  • “Hateful” not only in inducing hatred of Abigail that might endanger her life both in prison and when and if she’s released but also as deserving the hatred and contempt of those who aren’t CSA victimologists, their myrmidons and votaries in the mass- media, law, politics, education, etc., and the tens of millions of  people in the United States alone, females more than males sans MRAs, the misogynist zealots of the soi-disant “men’s movement,” they’ve poisoned and propagandized.

Transformed By Testosterone: Child To Man

17 Sunday Apr 2016

Posted by in Abigail Simon, age of consent, CSA victimology, Uncategorized, women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters", women as rapists, women sex offenders

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , ,

Writes David T. Courtwright:

Testosterone is why boys are born boys, and why they become men. In the absence of testosterone the fetus will develop into a female, nature’s “default” body plan…At the onset of puberty the testes flood the body with testosterone, raising blood levels to as much as twenty times those of women and prepubertal boys. This surge in testosterone in young men has anabolic effects, including increased muscle mass and bone density, as well as androgenic effects, including hairier bodies, deeper voices, and what is of concern here, increased libido, impulsiveness, and aggressiveness….We know that testosterone is causally related to these changes because its presence or absence is easily manipulated. Castrated human males, even castrated criminals, lose interest in sex and fighting. (Violent Land. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996, pp. 18-19.)

Note that by “men,” Courtwright means not only those age 18 and over but all pubescent males, transformed into men, profoundly and dramatically, by testosterone. And in regard to aggression, violence,  and criminality, sexual and non-sexual, his focus is on young men, particularly single males, in their teens and twenties. Males become men at puberty, not when they turn 18, which means nothing biologically. Manhood is biological, not an arbitrary legal distinction.

But under the laws of Michigan, the 6’3″, 220 lb. biological man of 15 and volcano of testosterone she transported to sexual paradise and whom she claims forced himself on her is defined as a “child” and “victim,” essentially the same in respect to sexual maturity and volition as prepubertal girls of 10 and 11 who are raped and/or molested by adult men.

Because They’re Not “Pedophiles”

09 Saturday Apr 2016

Posted by in Abigail Simon, age of consent, CSA victimology, Uncategorized, women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters", women as rapists, women sex offenders

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , ,

And such women must be defined and vilified as “pedophiles” and “child molesters” precisely because they are not pedophiles and child molesters.A pedophile is a man (pubescent teenage males under age 18 as well as adult men age 18 and older, heterosexual or homosexual) with a sexual fixation on and obsession with prepubescent children, girls or boys. To quote wikipedia: “Pedophilia or paedophilia is a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children, generally age 11 or younger.”

The imaginary “victims” of these women are not prepubescent children, boys or girls, “generally age 11 or younger.” They are pubescent teenage males ages 13-17. Ergo, the women are not “pedophiles.” End of story. Case closed. Nor are they “child molesters,” since their “victims” are not children, biologically as opposed to legally, but men, exactly the same as adults in respect to sexuality: compulsions, desires, fantasies, obsessions, fetishes, disorders, perversions, the penetration and impregnation of adult women and underage adolescent girls, “sexual harassment,” molestation, rape and gang-rape.

Moreover, I would argue that few if any women (including pubescent teenagers under statutory age) “experience a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children, generally age 11 or younger.” I would argue that few if any females, adults or adolescents, who have “sexual contact” with prepubertal children, boys or girls, are pedophiles, certainly not in the sense that males are pedophiles. In fact, it’s debatable if a woman can  even be a pedophile under the APA definition.Ralph Underwager and Hollida Wakefield summarize this definition:

…The DSM-IV American Psychiatric Association (1994) defines pedophilia in terms of recurrent, intense sexually arousing fantasies, sexual urges, or behaviors involving sexual activity with a prepubescent child or children, and requires that the fantasies,urges, or behaviors cause clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning. It is therefore possible for an individual who meets these criteria to have never engaged in illegal sexual behaviors. At the same time, not all sex offenders against a minor (a prepubertal child, they should have written, M.K.) are pedophiles. All mental health professionals acting  in an expert witness capacity should know this distinction.(“Special Problems With Sexual Abuse Cases,” in Coping with Psychiatric and Psychological Testimony. Los Angeles: Law and Psychology Press, 1995, p. 1336.)

But, increasingly “pedophilia” is now defined, falsely and absurdly, as “sex between adults and children,”  including pubescent teenagers under age 18, and thus adults are defined and vilified as “pedophiles” for engaging in coitus or fellatio or “sexual contact” with biological men and women under age 18.

But to define an “adult” who turned 18 a week ago as a “pedophile” for having sex with a “child” who will turn 18 and thus be an “adult” in 13 days is so perverse and ludicrous that even CSA victimologists, the ideologues and fanatics culpable for the bogus and malign usage of this aspersive and incendiary term, are constrained to offer exceptions and qualifications, themselves arbitrary and irrational. Thus, according to the “experts,” an adult must be 4-5 years older than a “child” to be branded as a “pedophile.”

So under this false and absurd definition of “pedophile” and the arbitrary and ridiculous age-disparity of 4-5 years between the “victim” and adult perpetrator, an 18-year-old adult female who has sex with a biological of 15 is not a “pedophile” if the magical age-disparity is 4-years but a 19-year-old female who has sex with the same 15-year-old is a “pedophile.” And a 20-year-old female who has sex with a biological man of 15 is a “pedophile” is the magical age-disparity is 5-years but a 19-year-old female who has sex with the same 15-year-old is not a “pedophile.”

tAs noted, adult women of any age who have sex with pubescent teenagers, males or females, are not pedophiles, but adolescent males can be pedophiles. So a 23-year-old woman teacher is vilified as a “pedophile” for having a love affair or tryst or engaging in a single act of “sexual contact” with a biological man of 15 or 16 who might be a true pedophile with an exclusive or primary attraction to prepubescent children.

 

 

Because They Are Not “Rapists”

08 Friday Apr 2016

Posted by in Abigail Simon, age of consent, CSA victimology, Uncategorized, women as rapists, women sex offenders

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , ,

Paradoxically, these women must be defined and vilified as “rapists” precisely because they are not rapists in any sense and because women can’t rape anyone in the pure and literal sense of the word, and because none of them used violence/force or threats of same -weapons such as guns or knives or their superior size and strength- to compel the submission of “victims” who were often if not usually the aggressors and initiators and invariably willing participants. And because women acting alone, without male accomplices, or under the duress of violent males, commit far less than 1% of violent sexual assaults, the overwhelming majority of which are rapes and gang rapes committed by males in their teens and 20’s, including biological men under age 16 or even 18 who are absurdly defined as “children” and even “little boys” who are incapable of consenting to or willingly and knowingly initiating sex with adult females.who are 4-5 years older. This according to CSA victimologists and, consequently, the laws of all 50 states. But, incongruously, they’re old and mature enough to willingly and knowingly rape and molest adult women and underage adolescent girls, and possibly to be “waived” into adult court and punished accordingly, if they and/or their crimes are especially sadistic, brutal, vicious, depraved.