• About

freeabigailsimon

~ women punished for having sex with biological men under age 18.

freeabigailsimon

Author Archives: Michael Kuehl

End of Story, Alas, Many Questions but no Answers?

19 Sunday Feb 2023

Posted by Michael Kuehl in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

As noted previously, Abigail was released from prison in late November, shortly before Thanksgiving. Her address was on the sex-offender registry and I wrote her two letters. I ended one letter by writing: “What a book you could write about your hellish and nightmarish ordeal.”

What a book I could write if she answered my questions in book-length detail. What a book we could write together, probably the only way such a book could be published, or even self-published, with the money and means of her family and friends. Lamentably, I received no reply, not even a short letter.

So many questions. What were the details of the plea-bargain, or plea-bargains, she rejected, the many conditions and penalties to which she’d be subjected? She was criticized, assailed as stupid and crazy and foolish, for rejecting a plea-bargain under which she’d serve “only” 6-months in jail. Under the final plea-bargain she rejected, would she have been sentenced to “only” 6-months in jail or sentenced to 12-months in jail with the possibility of being released after 6-months?

And what penalties would she have endured and suffered, what restrictions on her freedoms and intrusions into her private life, when released from jail after “only” 6- or 12-months? How many years of parole and probation, with all or most of the penalties and miseries I describe in “Abigail’s Life a-After Prison, Hell Continues”? And how many years of electronic parole-monitoring with an ankle-tether/”bracelet” she can never remove (not even when showering, bathing, sleeping) and all which that entails in regard to private and public mortification, embarrassment, itching, cuts, bruises, abrasions, skin infections. And a lifetime or at least 20-30 years of public sex-offender registration with her mugshot, name, and address on the internet and all which that entails in regard to danger and humiliation.

Assuming, for the sake of argument, that she’s lying about everything, were the penalties and conditions she would have endured under the plea-bargain she rejected so harsh and onerous and dreadful, especially for a child of wealth and privilege, that she pled not guilty and went to trial, risking a sentence far more harsh and dreadful, with the hope that she’d be acquitted, “not guilty” on all charges, and thus free to have a life as normal as possible given the memories, profound and haunting and ineradicable, of her hellish and nightmarish ordeal/ The result was “guilty” on all charges and an ordeal far more hellish and nightmarish.

And questions about her life in jail and prison. Almost a decade of her life with no privacy and freedom: the misery and monotony, fear and anxiety, humiliation and debasement, hundreds of nights with little or no sleep, staring into darkness, often crying; the dismally boring daily routine, virtually unvarying, hour after hour and day after day and week after week and month after month and year after year for almost a decade of her life.

A highly Inteligent, sensitive, educated woman, a first-offender convicted of nonviolent and victimless and mala prohibita felonies, she was enslaved for 8-years in a zoo with hundreds of low-IQ, white-hating, inner-city blacks, most of them violent.

Was she assaulted during her 8-years of incarceration? And if so, how many times and how exactly? Many or a few times or only twice or even once? And was she punched, slapped, kicked, pushed, bitten, assaulted with objects? And if so, what objects and how exactly? And by whom, individuals or small gangs of 2 or 3 or 4 prisoners. And was she injured, mildly or severely? And how exactly: cuts, bruises, sprains, concussions, broken bones?

And if she was never assaulted, not even once during almost a decade of imprisonment, I’m sure she was harassed, bullied, reviled, mortified, threatened with violence. And if so, frequently, occasionally, rarely, weekly or monthly, and how exactly? And even if she was never assaulted, I’m sure she feared that she’d be assaulted. And did she fear that she’d be killed severely injured? And if so, how often?

Was she abused by the guards, verbally or physically. Or punished and debased in ways that she viewed as unjust, at least moderately, and excessive and gratuitous? And if so, how often and how exactly?

And question about her life and the penalties she’s now suffering and will suffer for years and decades: the gratuitous and sundry restrictions on her freedoms and intrusions into her private life, electronic parole-monitoring with an ankle tether/”bracelet” she can never remove and the responses of those who see her in public and recognize her and act in a hostile or threatening manner.

It appears she has no intention of answering any of my questions much less all or most of them or even informing me in a short letter that she has no such intentions.

But even if she wanted to respond by mail and answer my questions, it’s likely she’d be ordered not to do so by her parole agent or others in authority or even enjoined from doing so under Michigan law.

The Public Sex-Offender Registry

19 Monday Dec 2022

Posted by Michael Kuehl in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

The public registry was enacted after a few monsters, all men, kidnapped, raped, tortured, and murdered young children, boys and girls (e.g., Adam Walsh, Megan’s law), and was then expanded over the years to include most and then virtually all men and women convicted of sexual offenses, guilty or innocent, from rapes and gang-rapes that included abductions, brutal, vicious, and sadistic beatings, torture, mutilation, and murder to women allowing biological men under age 16 or even 18 to penetrate them in de facto consensual relationships -the only crime in which the “victims” enjoy the actus reus (i.e., the sex” more than the women who “rape” and “molest” them and are often if not usually the aggressors and initiators of their phantasmal and theoretical “victimization,” in some cases even raping and molesting in fact the women who “raped” and “molested” them under the law and in the minds of CSA victimologists and the untold millions of people they’ve succeeded in browbeating and indoctrinating, e.g., Cassandra Sorenson-Grohall, Melissa Bitter, and Abigail if she’s telling most or some of the truth about her “victim” being the victimizer.

And thus even women like Cassandra, Melissa, Abigail, and hundreds like them, first-offenders convicted of nonviolent and victimless and mala prohibitum felonies, women who’ve never committed a volent or other serious crime in their lives and never will and are not a “threat to society” or to anyone nor even a danger to re-offend by having sex with another young man under statutory age -and, in some instances, were the de facto victims of their de jure “victims”- are compelled to register for life or at least 20-30 years as uniquely deviant and dangerous criminals, based on the myth and dogma that they’re a danger to re-offend when I’d be amazed if even one woman who was sentenced to months in jail or years in prison has re-offended by having sex with another young men under statutory age, and possibly even a threat to commit acts of sexual violence that include abductions, torture, and murder.

Another irony is that there is no reason for monsters who kidnap, rape, torture, and murder young children, or monsters like the Carr Brothers and the Knoxville savages and many others who rape and murder adults and underage teenagers, to have their names, mugshots, and addresses on public sex-offender registries, since they will either die in prison or be executed and are thus no danger to young children, teenagers, or adults of both sexes. The only people they can assault, sexually or non-sexually, and murder are a small number of male inmates and guards and others of both sexes in prison with them and with whom they closely interact.

“Minor Attractive/Attraction” as a Euphemism for Pedophile/Pedophilia

14 Wednesday Dec 2022

Posted by Michael Kuehl in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

On Fox News, for example, right-wing hosts and guests are alarmed and incensed that some leftists (they’d like all or most to believe all or most) are trivializing the evil and crime of pedophilia by calling this perversion and disorder “minor attraction’ and pedophiles are “minor attractive.”

A minor is a person, male or female, under the age of 18. Young men and women of 16 and 17 are minors. and the generic age of consent is 16 in most US states and 14 or 15 in many other nations, including European countries. If attraction to young men and women of 16 and 17 or 14 and 15 is “pedophilia,” then almost all people, men and women, adults and adolescents, heterosexual and homosexual, are “pedophiles.” And, ironically, the only people who are not attracted to young men and women under the age of 18 are pedophiles who are exclusively attracted to prepubescent children.

Pedophilia is attraction to prepubescent children. And a pedophile is a man (including older male adolescents) with a fixation on and obsession with prepubescent girls or boys. It’s debatable if women can even be pedophiles under the APA definition for the same reason that few if any women are fetishists, at least not in the sense that males are fetishists

The ultimate absurdity is defining women as “rapists” and “pedophiles”.for allowing biological men under age 16 or even 18 to penetrate them in de facto consensual relationships -the only crime in which the “victims” enjoy the actus reus (i.e., the sex) more than the women who “rape” and “molest” them and are often if not usually the aggressors and initiators of their phantasmal and theoretical “victimization.”

Abigail is Released from Prison in Late November

07 Wednesday Dec 2022

Posted by Michael Kuehl in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Several months ago a cabal of CSA victimologists persuaded bing.com to remove my website address from their search engine. Luckily, they didn’t succeed with google.com. Since roughly 80-90% of my views came from bing.com rather than google.com and a few other sources, the number of views I now receive is only a fraction of those I received before the purge.

So when I received 46 views on Nov. 21 and 42 on Nov. 22, I was sure this was not a freakish coincidence, but explained by Abigail’s release from prison. And thus I searched for her name on MIchigan’s public sex offender registry, and was glad to see that she was no longer in prison but now living in Grand Blanc, MI, with family I assume.

Since Abigail is a “convicted sex offender, with a “child” as her “victim, she’s enjoined from using the internet. So nearly all of the 88 views on Nov. 21 and 22 were by family and friends.

So, apparently, she was released from prison on the Nov. 19 or 20, roughly a week before the official release date of Nov. 26, a modest act of kindness by the authorities, surprisingly, so she could be with her family before and during Thanksgiving.

Since her address was on the sex offender registry, I sent her a letter on Tuesday of last week that she likely received on Friday or Saturday. I have many question -to which, hopefully, I’ll get answers- questions about the intrigue, whatever occurred exactly, with her de jure “victim,” factually consensual sex which is punished as a felony under Michigan law with a maximum sentence of 25-years to life in prison and a lifetime of quasi-totalitarian surveillance and persecution; her arrest, prosecution, trial, conviction, and sentence; her life in jail and prison and thereafter.

Questions she could not answer during her 8-years in prison -since, as noted previously, she was not allowed to receive and read a letter and articles and blogposts I sent her on the grounds that my heterodox, to many truly sacrilegious, contentions and arguments were “a threat to security, good order, and discipline.”

Does Abigail Know that Feminism is Culpable, Seminally and Predominantly, for Destroying her Life?

04 Tuesday Oct 2022

Posted by Michael Kuehl in "sex-offender treatment", Abigail Simon, Abigail Simon sentence, criminal sentences, CSA victimology, feminism, sex offender registry, Uncategorized, women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters", women as rapists, women sex offenders

≈ 3 Comments

Tags

feminism, innate sex differences, plea-bargain, women as rapists, women sex offenders

As noted previously, in a few posts, Abigail was prohibited from receiving and reading a letter and articles I sent to the Huron Valley Correctional Facility. To the authorities, my words were a “threat to security, good order, or discipline.”

Did the left-feminist ideologues and totalitarians who rule the prison and the lives of inmates believe that Abigail would have gone berserk and attacked the guards and/or other inmates, perhaps inciting a riot or mass revolt, had she been allowed to read my heterodox and “politically-incorrect” arguments and contentions? Or simply that they would have vitiated the efficacy of her “sex-offender treatment”?

So, in effect, I’m a victim of censorship, denied the right to correspond with Abigail and ask her many questions about her intrigue with a 15-year-old student and biological man, her phantasmal and theoretical “victim” whom she claims forced himself on her three times and “controlled her life” by threats and manipulation; her arrest, prosecution, trial, why she rejected the plea-bargains, her life in jail and prison; her life, especially as an adult, before it was shattered, forever and needlessly, by the criminal injustice system; her ideals, values, and opinions on various issues and subjects: e.g., what did she think of Mary Letourneau and her affair with a student and her sentence of 8-years in jail and prison and a lifetime of public sex-offender registration. What did she think of such laws and penalties, to the extent that she was aware of them, before they ruined her life?

Like most educated women, the overwhelming majority, alas,, I presume that Abigail is a left-liberal, probably more liberal than extreme/radical left, though I could be wrong. And, moreover, that she defines and thinks of herself as a feminist, however defined, broadly or narrowly, vaguely or precisely, accurately or inaccurately. If so, does she know that feminism is culpable, seminally and predominantly, for destroying her life.

In pre-feminist America, including the 1960s, the decade of  the “sexual revolution,” “statutory rape” laws didn’t even apply to women in most jurisdictions. And if they did so apply to women in some states or if women who had sex with young men under age 16 or 18 were guilty of a “moral’s offense,” however defined, how many women were arrested, prosecuted, convicted, and sentenced to jail or prison for such offenses? (Read my blog-post on Kirk Douglas) And how many were sentenced to 8-25 years in prison, like Abigail, or 6-15 years, like Kathryn Ronk, or enslaved for 8-years, like Mary Letourneau; or 40-years, like Shannon Schmeider, with a chance for parole after “only” 20 years; or life with a chance for parole after “only” 10-years, apparently, like Michelle Taylor; or 20-years with no chance for parole, like Brittany Zamora, and who knows how many other women, teachers and non-teachers, who received similar prison sentences. In pre-feminist America, was there even one woman who received such a draconian sentence for having a love affair or mere tryst with a biological man under age 18?

And even if incarcerated, none of them, upon their release, were subjected to years of quasi-totalitarian post-incarceration supervision, mandatory “sex-offender treatment,” electronic parole-monitoring with an ankle tether/”bracelet,” and registration for life or at least 20-30 years as uniquely dangerous and degenerate criminals, their mug-shots, names, and addresses on the internet for all to see and all that that entails in regard to danger and mortification.

None of these laws and policies, these draconian/Orwellian punishments, inflicted on Abigail and myriads of other women for no exigent and practical reasons, would exist if not for feminism. Beginning in the early 1970s, in deference to feminism and the anti-rape movement which began, publicly and officially, in 1971 with the New York radical feminist rape conference, sex crime laws were revamped. State legislators, overwhelmingly male, enacted and imposed laws written by feminist lawyers.

De facto consensual sex between adults and young men and women under age 16 or 18, depending on the age of consent in each jurisdiction, was now a “gender-neutral” crime that applied equally to women and was equated or conflated under the law with violent-forcible rape and the rape and/or molestation of prepubescent children. And women were now defined and vilified as “rapists” and “pedophiles” for allowing biological men under age 16 or even 18 to penetrate them in factually consensual relationships

Most infamously, Mary Letourneau was convicted of “child rape” under Washington law, and sentenced to almost a decade in jail and prison and a lifetime of public sex-offender registration, albeit she didn’t rape her “victim,” obviously, nor did she use violence/force or threats of same to compel his submission, nor was she guilty of molesting a prepubescent child. Her victim” was the aggressor and initiator who forced himself on her the first time they had intercourse. (Read my articles and blog-posts on her case for more details and analysis.)

Cassandra Sorenson-Grohall was convicted of “sexual assault of a child,” which implies that she was guilty of violence/force or threats of same in sexually abusing and violating a helpless and innocent  prepubescent boy, and sentenced to 4-years in prison and a lifetime of sex-offender registration -when, in fact, she was the victim of abuse and her “victim” was the abuser and victimizer. He was not a child, biologically, but a man in size and sexuality, a delinquent and criminal of 15 who, as her student, constantly harassed and implored her for sex at school and in her classroom, molested and kissed her against her will, and finally raped her when she visited him at home on school business, apparently when no one else was present. She didn’t report the rape lest he “go to prison and become more of a delinquent.” Exploiting her altruism and compassion, not only misguided and foolish but ill-deserved and self-destructive, he manipulated and bullied her into having sex with him in an intrigue she didn’t know how to “end without hurting him,” resulting to her arrest and all that followed,

The real criminal, sexually and otherwise, was not punished, and who knows how many crimes he committed before he raped and molested Cassandra, and who knows how manyy crimes he’s committed thereafter. Did he rape any more women or adolescent girls, or even murder someone, like the “victim” of Melissa Bittner, who was convicted of
“sexual assault” and sentenced to prison and much else because she was sexually assaulted by a 16-year-old delinquent. (See the posts on her case for more details.)

Ironically and paradoxically, such iniquities and outrages and travesties, inflicted even on women who were raped and molested by their de jure “victims” but still charged with and convicted of felony sex offenses, and the draconian-Orwellian sentences, are inconceivable apart from feminism and the anti-rape movement and CSA victimology.

CSA victimology and it’s tenets and dogmas and the resultant mass-hysteria, psychosis, moral panics, witch-hunts, and imprisonment and persecution of myriads of men and women who were/are either innocent or guilty of nonviolent and victimless and mala prohibita felonies, overwhelmingly first-offenders who, even if not innocent, were/are not violent and dangerous, people who’ve never committed a violent or other mala in se crime in their lives and almost surely never will and are not a “threat to society or to anyone nor even a “danger to reoffend” by having sex with another biological man or woman under statutory age – this madness and reign of terror is inconceivable apart from feminist ideology and it’s decades-long jihad against sexual victimization, real and imagined.

Nor would adult women who have sex with young men under statutory age be absurdly defined and vilified as “rapists” and “pedophiles” if not for feminism and the myth and premise that men and women and boys and girls are exactly the same apart from the inescapable differences in anatomy and the conflation of prepubescent boys and girls with pubescent male and female adolescents. And even the inescapable differences in anatomy and their relevance to and importance in sexual postures and possibilities are denied and trivialized as irrelevant and insignificant by feminists and other leftists and egalitarians (most fanatically, obsessively, and viciously by MRA, the misogynist crazies and liars of the soi-disant “men’s movement”) who define and vilify adult women as “rapists” for allowing biological men under age 16 or even 18 to penetrate them in factually consensual relationships  “sex-equality dogma taken to lunatic extremes,” to quote John Derbyshire, and the only crime in which the “victim” enjoys the actus reus (i.e. the sex) more than the woman who “rapes” and/or “molests” and is often if not usually the aggressor and initiator of his phantasmal and theoretical “victimization.” Nor would young men under age 16 or even 18 who consent to or initiate sex with adult women be defined as “victims” of “rape” and CSA who are “traumatized” and “scarred for life.”

Abigail was convicted of “criminal sexual misdonduct,” a vague term, legally and empircally, under which all sorts of sex-acts that are now crimes, nearly always felonies, are subsumed: everything from violent-forcible rape, iinclding the most sadistic, brutal, vicious rapes and gang-rapes, truly “heinous” crimes that often also involve aggravated assault, kidnapping, “false imprisonment,” home invasions, torture, mutilation, and murder; to the molestation of prepubescent children; to factually consensual sex between adults and young men and women under statutory age, including women who are convicted of felonies for having sex with biological men under age 16 or 18 (or even 18-year-olds if the women is a teacher or tutor like Abigail and the “victim” is a student under her authority.

In contrast, legally and empirically, “statutory rape” is not a vaguely defined criminal offense. It defines, clearly and accurately, a specific and objective act. The modifying “statutory” denotes an absence of violent/force or threats of same to compel the submission of the “victim” -i.e., it reveals that the sex was consensual, factually as opposed to legally- while “rape” signifies the reality of penile-vaginal penetration, an act which only males can perpetrate. Thus even to define the women above as “statutory rapists” and their “crimes” as “statutory rape” is objectively and empirically false and thus absurd.

To repeat: Does Abigail know that feminism is culpable, seminally and predominantly, for destroying her life, culpable for her sentence of 8-25 years in prison and a lifetime of electronic parole-monitoring with an ankle-tether she can never remove and public sex-offender registration. And so, too, now and in the past and future, he women above and far too many others whose lives have been and will be blighted or destroyed by modern feminism and CSA victimology.

 

Beyond Insanity: Abigail’s Life After Prison, Hell Continues

30 Friday Sep 2022

Posted by Michael Kuehl in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

When Abigail is released from prison, whenever and finally, so begins the 2nd and 3rd stages of her draconian/Orwellian life sentence. Only death will free her.

As I’ve said many times before, when Abigail is released from prison after “only” 8-years, most likely, but perhaps longer, she’ll be subjected to years of quasi-totalitarian post-incarceration surveillance, restrictions on her freedoms and intrusions into her private life that don’t apply to low-IQ brutes and savages with histories of violence and criminality beginning at age 13 or 14 or 15 who’ve committed dozens and scores of violent and other mala in se felonies but who’ve never been convicted of a sexual offense albeit most of them have raped or gang-raped men in jails and/or prisons and/or women and adolescent girls.

Since Abigail was sentenced to 8-25 years in prison, I assume she’ll be on parole for 17-years if released from prison after “only” 8-years or 15-years if released from prison after 10-years -until, whenever she’s released, the age of 60! And, of course, she was sentenced to a lifetime of electronic parole-monitoring with an ankle tether/”bracelet” she can never remove and and public sex-offender registration with her name, mugshot, and address on the internet for billions to see worldwide, everyone with access to a computer, and all that that entails in regard to danger and mortification: hate mail, incuding death threats, salacious propositions, marriage proposals, obscene letters with photos of male genitalia, harassment, threats and insults in person, vandalism of property, physical assaults, possibly even murder.

Yes, from hell to hell, and, almost surely, from hell-hole to hell-hole, from prison to Flint, MI, for who knows how many years unless, or until, she has the means to move to a better city.

When she’s released from prison after 8- or 10-years of enslavement, I assume she’ll be driven by her parents to their home in Flint and that she’ll live with them until she finds a job and can afford an apartment. According to city-data.com, the population of Flint was 95,538 in 2019, a decrease of 23.5% from 2000. Blacks were 53.2% of the population in 2019, whites only 36.2%.

There were 45 murders in Flint in 2016, 37 in 2017, and 32 in 2018; 104 rapes in 2017 and 130 in 2018; 1466 assaults in 2017 and 1383 in 2018. I’m sure that over 90% of these rapes and murders and assaults were committed by violent recidivist black male criminals who should have been in prison rather than free to commit these and other felonies and misdemeanors.

How ironic if a few months or weeks or even days after her release from prison Abigail is raped and/or murdered by a violent recidivist black criminal, almost surely with a history of violence and criminality beginning at age 13 or 14 or 15, who should have been in prison rather than free to rape and murder her and commit many other violent and mala in se crimes. If murdered, however, at least she’ll be free of all this:

I quote at length from a document not even dystopian novelists like Orwell and Kafka could have imagined and prophesized (Wisconsin Dept. of Corrections Sex Offender Registry Program, Sex Offender Supervision and Rules):

At intake, a standard set of sex offender rules is imposed for all sex offenders placed on supervision….The following are some examples of supervision rules specifically for sex offenders (emphasis added);

  1. You shall not enter into any area frequented by persons under age 18 years including but not limited to: schools, day care centers, playgrounds, parks, beaches, pools, shopping malls, theaters, or festivals without prior agent approval.

2. You shall have no contact with any person under the age of 18 years without prior agent approval and unless accompanied by an adult sober chaperone approved by your agent. This includes face-to-face, telephone, mail, electronic, third party or “drive by” contact.

3. You shall fully cooperate with, participate in, and successfully complete all evaluations, counselling and treatment as required by the agent, including but not limited to sex offender treatment.

4. You shall fully cooperate with all procedures required to undergo lie detector examinations in accord with 1995 WI Statute 361.132 as directed by the agent.

5. You shall not subscribe to or use any sexually explicit phone service whatsoever, including but not limited to 900 sex telephone lines without prior agent approval.

6. You shall have no contact with ___ norany victims nor their family members without prior agent approval. This includes face-to-face, telephone, mail, electronic, third party or “drive b” contact.

7. You shall not establish, pursue, nor maintain any dating and/or romantic and/or sexual relationship without prior agent approval.

8. you shall not reside nor “stay” overnight in any place other than a preapproved residence without prior agent approval…

9. You shall not possess nor view any sexually explicit material -visual, auditory, or computer-generated without prior agent approval.

10. You shall not alter your physical appearance, nor shall you in any manner attempt to conceal your identity without prior approval from your agent.

And these are “some” of the rules that applied to sex-offenders in Wisconsin over 20-years ago. And I’m sure that the rules in Michigan to which Abigail will be subjected to until the age of 60 and beyond are just as if not even more draconian, punitive, intrusive, repressive, Orwellian, and quasi-totalitarian: all unneccessary to protect anyone from anything.

To call all of this insane is an understatement. It’s beyond insanity.

The Witch-Burning of Abigail Simon

18 Sunday Sep 2022

Posted by Michael Kuehl in "anarcho-tyranny", "traumatization", Abigail Simon, Abigail Simon sentence, age of consent, Cassandra, Cassandra Sorenson-Grohall, criminal sentences, CSA victimology, Melissa Bittner, MRAs, "men's movement, sex offender registry, statutory rape, Uncategorized, women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters", women as rapists, women sex offenders

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Abigail Simon, Abigail Simon sentence, age of consent, sex offender registry, women as rapists, women sex offenders

On Nov. 26, 2014, in Grand Rapids, MI, Abigail Simon (a former math tutor at a Catholic high school) was convicted at trial of three counts of “first-degree criminal sexual conduct,” a felony with a maximum sentence of 25-years to life in prison and a mandatory minimum of 8-25 years, for allegedly having sex with a  male student who, according to her testimony in court and statements to SVU detectives and prosecutors when interrogated,  was not only the aggressor in their sexual intrigue but also forced himself on her 3 times and “controlled her life” by threats and manipulation; and also the felony of “accosting a minor for immoral purposes” for exchanging hundreds of emails and text messages with her “victim,” a 6’3″, 220 lb. biological man of 15 and football star who initially confessed to authorities and also testified under oath at a pretrial hearing that Abigail’s version of what occurred was true but later recanted and claimed not only that he didn’t force himself on her but also that she was the initiator of their liaison and controlled the action and relationship. She told the authorities and testified in court that she responded to his hundreds of emails and text-messages to keep him away from her because she didn’t want to have sex with him and was afraid of him for the reasons above.

So what occurred, exactly? Who is telling the truth and who is lying? Only one of them or both to some degree? Only Abigail and her “victim,” nameless and faceless, know the answers, And I’m sure their memories, and interpretations of same, differ.

According to a man who believed her testimony and was thus sympathetic to Abigail, commenting on the internet after her conviction, he recanted and changed his story after being threatened with charges of rape by prosecutors who were 100% certain that Abigail was “guilty” and wanted to prosecute her not only for “accosting a minor for immoral purposes,” a felony with a maximum-sentence of 4-years in prison and other mandatory punishments, but also “first-degree criminal sexual conduct.”

On Jan. 14, 2015, the judge was “merciful,” imposing the mandatory-minimum sentence of “only” 8-25 years in prison and a lifetime of electronic parole-monitoring with an ankle tether/”bracelet and public sex-offender registration. He conceded that she was not a “predator” who was likely to “re-offend” by having sex with another young man under statutory age much less commit violent and other mala in se crimes, and that her “victim” also knew that their intrigue was “wrong” and was thus “partly responsible,’ even if he didn’t rape her and “control her life” by threats and manipulation.  Thus he was not a CSA victimologist, fanatical and dogmatic, at her sentencing. (This would later change, as we’ll see, for whatever reasons.) But he had no choice, no “discretion” to impose a sane and “just” and rational and proportionate sentence, a sentence that would blight but not destroy her life.

Even if he had such discretion, however, he probably would have sentenced her to 4-6 years in prison if not longer rather than “only” 6-12 months in jail or 1-2 years in prison, knowing the hysteria and outrage that such “leniency” would provoke not only in Grand Rapids and Michigan but nationwide: near universal condemnation, publicly and privately, indignation and rebukes and tirades from CSA victimologists, their votaries and voices in the mass media, and the tens of millions of people they’ve browbeat and/or brainwashed, including politicians, police, and prosecutors, judges and jurors. And also MRAs, the misogynist crazies and liars of the soi-disant “men’s movement,” and millions of people, overwhelmingly males of course but more females than one would expect, whom they’ve vitiated and duped to various degrees with their woman-hating vitriol and mendacity. And, probably, a fusillade and torrent of hate-mail, possibly including death threats,, and perhaps even assaults and/or vandalism.

Under the law and to many if not most people, in fantasy as opposed to reality, she was so dangerous, such a “threat to society” and all the children of Michigan, that she couldn’t be released on bond but had to be enslaved in jail for almost two months before sentencing. At her sentencing, in a drab unisex denim jumpsuit, with no makeup, her medium-brown hair in a pony-tail with the blonde “highlights” faded, in handcuffs attached to a waist-chain and leg-irons for well over 2-hours, so debilitated and mortified by fear and shame (not for her “crimes,” but the chains, the crowd, the circus, the cameras, etc.) and despair and lack of sleep that she could barely walk or even stand and almost collapsed twice, she appeared to be on the verge of a “nervous breakdown” after “only” 7-weeks in jail.

Imagine her feelings, the excruciating torment, the emotional torture, the profound and crushing debasement, the inquisitorial cruelty, the powerlessness and desperation: chained like a wild beast or a feral male criminal,  a low-IQ savage and/or psychopath, big and fast and strong, violent and dangerous, and possibly deranged; shackled in handcuffs attacked to a waist-chain and leg-irons for over two hours for no exigent and practical reason, e.g., to prevent her from trying to escape and/or assaulting people, possibly causing serious injuries, and with two guards, a male and female, standing behind her, grim and vigilant, armed with guns and tasers and pepper spray. All unnecessary to protect anyone from anything. Gratuitous abuse and cruelty and degradation, pure and simple.

In contrast, when sentenced to death for the car-jacking, abduction, “false imprisonment,” gang-rape, sadistic beatings, torture, mutilation, and murder of Christopher Newsom and Channon Christian, Lemaricus Davidson was in street clothes and he wasn’t shackled, though he was clearly a threat to assault the police and guards, probably trying to wrest the gun from one of them, probably a female -and, if successful, he could have shot and killed people before he was shot and killed or wounded and incapacitated; or to attack with his fists and feet the prosecutors, his lawyers, the victim’s parents, even the judge, possibly causing serious injuries before he was overpowered, incapacitated, probably by the use of a taser and pepper spray, subdued and shackled. I suggest you watch videos on youtube.com of courtroom mayhem and violence, altercations involving two or more people, punching, kicking, grabbing, the use of chairs as weapons, mostly between rapists and murderers and the families of their victims one can reasonably assume.

Incredibly, this subhuman beast and monster was afforded and treated with far more dignity and respect than was Abigail at her sentencing for a nonviolent and victimless and malum prohibitum felony, assuming she was guilty of such and lying about her “victim” raping and terrorizing her And so, too, were the other savages and monsters who were sentenced not to death but to decades in prison for one of the most gruesome, sadistic, hideous, sickening, depraved, horrific, ghastly, hellish, “unspeakable,” and “heinous” crimes in all of U.S. and world history.

(In a sane and just and rational country, they would have all been executed well over 10-years ago and Abigail would not have even been charged with a crime and surely not a felony. She would have been punished, non-criminally, by dismissal and the revocation of her license and expulsion from the profession for 5-10 years. Or, at worst, charged with a misdemeanor, however defined, and sentenced to probation (and perhaps house-arrest) until her “victim” turned 16, the generic age of consent in MIchigan, No prison, no jail, no quasi-totalitarian surveillance, no “sex-offender treatment,” no electronic parole-monitoring with an ankle-tether/”bracelet,” no public sex-offender registration. And that assuming she’s lying about her “victim” being the victimizer.)

And, in chains for over 2-hours, she was forced to hear the SVU detectives, prosecutors, various “experts,” CSA victimologists,” the “victim’s” mother, etc., demonize and vilify her as a monster and degenerate,  a “sexual predator,” “child molester,” “child sexual abuser,” possibly even a “rapist” and “pedophile”; and her “victim,” a biological man of 15 who enjoyed the sex more than she did irrespective of the facts and whether or not he forced himself on her, defined and pitied as a “victim” of “rape” and CSA who is “traumatized,” devastated, and “scarred for life,” a depiction of the crime and actors that is not only false but execrably and ludicrously so.

She, not her “victim,” will be traumatized, devastated, and scarred for life.

And the “victim’s” mother, vicious in her lust for vengeance, implored the judge to be “severe in his sentencing,” i.e., to impose the maximum sentence of 25-years to life. Obviously, she knew that the judge had no choice but to sentence Abigail to 8-25 years in prison and a lifetime of draconian/Orwellian persecution. So to her, “only” 8-25 years in prison was too lenient for a woman who “used” a “child” for her “perverted desires” in a state and country in which violent and/or recidivist male criminals are repeatedly and systematically coddled. How crestfallen and outraged she must have been when the judge abjured her pleas and sentenced Abigail to “only” 8-25 years in prison and a lifetime of draconian/Orwellian persecution.

In a poll,, conducted by local Media, over 10% of respondents thought her sentence was too indulgent! And roughly 30% thought it was just and rational and proportionate: a testament to the power and influence of the media and CSA victimology -and, to a lesser degree, MRAs the misogynist lunatics of the soi-disant “men’s movement,”, who believe or claim to believe, contrary to the facts, that women who “rape” biological men under age 18 are rarely sentenced to prison or even jail while men guilty of the “exact same crime” with females are almost always crucified with their lives utterly destroyed. I’m sure they were elated by Abigail’s hideously draconian sentence while expressing outrage that such “justice” for male victims is so rare as to be virtually non-existent.

8-25 years in prison for a first-offender convicted of a nonviolent and victimless and malum prohibitum felony; 8-25 years in prison for crimes that are legal acts in dozens of other nations, including European countries; 8-25 years in prison for “crimes” in which the “victim” craves and enjoys the actus reus (i.e., the sex) far more than the woman who “rapes” and/or “molests” him and is often if not usually the aggressor and initiator of his phantasmal and theoretical “victimization”; 8-25 years in prison for transporting a biological man of 15 to sexual paradise in a factually consensual relationship.

And that’s assuming she’s “guilty” and lying about his raping and terrorizing her. If her story is truthful, completely or essentially, in whole or in part, then she was sentenced to 8-25 years in prison for “sexual assault” because her “victim” sexually assaulted her – as did the “victim” of Cassandra Sorenson-Grohall, who testified in court and admitted to police that he sexually harassed, molested, and raped her; and the “victim” of Melissa Bittner,” transparently innocent of sexually molesting a 16-year-old predator and criminal who sexually molested her but convicted of “sexual assault” and sentenced to prison and 20-years of public sex-offender registration.

8-25 years in prison in a country in which, during the 1990s, the decade in which the U.S. began to “get tough” on violent crime, the average time-served for murder (including non-negligent manslaughter) was less than 6-years and the average time-served for all violent crimes (aggravated assault, rape, robbery, homicide) was approximately 4-years. And these averages are even more execrable, appalling, and outrageous than they first appear, since one can reasonable assume that-90% of such felonies were committed by violent recidivists, overwhelmingly males with histories of violence and predation usually beginning at age 13 or 14, and most of whom should have been in prison rather than free to commit their latest violent felonies. And it’s likely that such averages are even lower today after 8-years of rule by Obama and Holder and Lynch and their advisors (including Al Sharpton) and appointees.

And she could have been sentenced to 25-years to life in prison for “crimes” that are legal acts in dozens of other nations, including European countries!

But a sentence of 8-25 years in prison is not punishment enough for a first-offender convicted of nonviolent and victimless and mala prohibitum felonies are legal acts or misdemeanors in dozens of other nations, including European countries. Nor, given the dogmas and fantasies of CSA victimologists, is it protection enough for all the boys and girls of MIchigan and the United States, including not only biological men under the legal age of consent but also young women under statutory age and prepubertal boys and girls.

Since her conviction wasn’t overturned on appeal and the judge who sentenced her to 8-25 years and a lifetime of surveillance and persecution twice upheld her draconian and Orwellian sentence, she’ll be enslaved for 8-years, at least, and perhaps longer. But if she doesn’t die in prison she’ll still be punished until the day she dies.

When released from prison after “only” 8-years, most likely, or 10- or 12-years(?), she’ll be subjected to years of post-incarceration quasi-totalitarian surveillance, probably including years of “sex-offender treatment,” even after years of same in prison, and restrictions on her freedoms and intrusions into her private life that not ever dystopian novelists like Orwell and Kafka could have imagined or prophesized decades ago, most of which don’t apply to violent felons, including male recidivists, who’ve never been convicted of a sexual offense. For how many years must she endure such penalties? I assume she’ll be on parole for 17-years if released from prison after “only” 8-years of enslavement or 15-years if released from prison after “only” 10-years of enslavement.

And, finally, her punishment includes a life-sentence of electronic parole-monitoring with an ankle-tether/” bracelet” she can never remove (not even when bathing, showering, sleeping) and registration for life as a uniquely deviant and dangerous criminal with her name, mugshot, and address on the internet for all to see with access to a computer, privately or publicly, and all which that entails in regard to danger and mortification, especially for a woman as infamous as Abigail due to weeks and months of local and state and national media coverage, tendentious and sensationalistic, surpassed only by Mary Letourneau.

All this for a first-offender convicted of nonviolent and victimless and mala prohibitum felonies (found “guilty” of having sex and exchanging emails and text-messages with a 15-year-old biological man who, if she’s telling the truth as a whole or largely, raped and bullied and terrorized and manipulated her), a woman who has never committed a violent or other mala in se crime in her life and never will and is not a “threat to society” or to anyone nor even a danger to “re-offend” by having sex with another young man under statutory age.

Not a single person of any age or either sex has been or will be any safer because of the imprisonment of Abigail for at least 8-years followed by decades of quasi-totalitarian surveillance and persecution. Not one violent or other serious crime has been or will be prevented or deterred by her hideously draconian/Orwellian life-sentence.

To call all of this insane is an understatement. It’s beyond insanity.

#For more details on how she’ll be punished for the rest of her life after she’s released from prison, the surveillance and penalties and laws to which she’ll be subjected until she dies, read “Abigail Simon: A Life-Sentence of Draconian/Orwellian Persecution.”

Abigail Simon: A life-Sentence of Draconian/Orwellian Persecution

18 Sunday Sep 2022

Posted by Michael Kuehl in Abigail Simon, sex offender registry, Uncategorized, women as rapists, women sex offenders

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

registry, sex offender registry, sex offenders

But a sentence of 8-25 years in prison is not punishment enough for a first-offender convicted of nonviolent and victimless and mala prohibita crimes that are legal acts or possibly misdemeanors (?) in dozens of other nations, including European Countries. Nor is it protection enough for all the boys and girls of Michigan and the United States, including not only biological men under the legal age of consent such as her “victim’ but also young women under statutory age and prepubertal children of both sexes.

Given the decision of the Supreme Court of Michigan not to hear her final appeal, she’ll be enslaved for 8-years, at least, and perhaps longer. But if she doesn’t die in prison she’ll still be punished until the day she dies. When she’s released from prison after “only” 8 or 10 or 12 years(?), she’ll be subjected to years of quasi-totalitarian “supervision,” probably including “sex-offender treatment,” restrictions on her freedom and intrusions into her private life that not even dystopian novelists like Orwell and Kafka could have imagined and prophesized decades ago, most of which don’t apply to violent criminals on probation who’ve never been convicted of a sexual offense, and registration for life as a uniquely vile and execrable and dangerous criminal -her name, mug-shot, and address on the internet for all to see in Michigan’s and national sex-offender registries- unlike myriads of brutes and savages who’ve committed many if not dozens and scores of violent and other mala in se felonies but who’ve never been convicted of a sexual offense albeit most of them have raped and gang-raped men in prisons and jails and/or women and adolescent girls in the free world.

But not even all this is enough to punish Abigail and similar “convicted sex offenders,” and to protect all the children of Michigan and the United States (if allowed to move to or visits other states) from this uniquely deviant and dangerous criminal. And also adults, apparently. And thus her draconian and Orwellian sentence also includes a life-sentence of electronic parole monitoring with an ankle-tether/”bracelet” that she can never remove.

To CSA victimologists and the ruling-elites and governing-classes they’ve successfully indoctrinated, most balefully and crucially those who enact and impose the laws and sentences and punishments (politicians, police, prosecutors, judges, etc.), and a media that controls the zeitgeist and public opinion, and tens of millions of people they’ve brainwashed, Abigail is viewed as such a danger to children  -from infants in their cradles to teenage criminals one day short of their 16th or 18th birthdays- that she must wear this tether or “bracelet,” as cumbersome as it’s conspicuous, 24-hours a day, in public and private: at work and play and leisure, when shopping, dining, walking the streets, sitting in a park, reading in a library, etc., and at home, waking and sleeping, having sex with a lover or spouse (assuming her parole agent permits this?), bathing, showering, etc.(Apparently, the device is waterproof so the tethered can’t be shocked when bathing or swimming.)

Shortly before her release from prison after 8 or 10 or 12 years, I assume the guards will strip her naked for the last time and then attach the tether to her bare ankle, probably with the assistance and under the supervision of a parole officer and/or SVU detective,  before she dresses in her own clothes and leaves the prison with family and/or friends.

She and myriads of other people whose one and only crime in life was having a liaison or tryst with a young man or women under statutory age can never remove this tether/ “bracelet.” Imagine the mortification, the embarrassment, the daily interaction with and responses and actions of other people for the rest of their lives or at least 20-30 years: e.g, for a woman at the beach, or a pool or gym or health club, or wearing shorts on warm days, or a dress or skirt at church or a wedding or party or restaurant, and so forth. The new-age scarlet letter.

And envision what if must be like having sex, for both the men and women who are tethered and their partners, lovers or spouses, whose ankles and feet and calves are bruised and even cut by the plastic during coitus or when lying in bed and sleeping, The constant discomfort, the itching, and also blisters, chafing, and rashes from a devise that must be worn 24-hours a day under all conditions. I assume the tether can be removed so cuts and rashes and blisters can be treated by a doctor, but only with the permission of and in the presence of a parole-officer and/or SVU detective.

If she lives to be 88 or 94 or 102, senile, blind or half-blind, confined to a wheelchair, living in a nursing home, or immobile and supine in a hospital bed, dying of cancer or simply old-age, even if unconscious, she must wear this tether until she dies and its removed by the authorities. And so, too, with her mugshot, name, and address on the internet in Michigan’s and national sex offender registries.. Only then will all the children of Michigan and all of America and the entire world be safe from this monster and degenerate.

So her life after prison -whether she dies in her 70s or 80s or 90s- will be worse in some ways than her life in prison. At least in prison she isn’t forced to wear an ankle-tether 24 hours a day and she can’t she receive hate-mail,  death threats, and obscene lust-letters with photos of male genitalia -the fate of many women on the public registry. And she can’t be raped and doesn’t have to worry about being raped because, as of now, male guards are not allowed in the housing units because of a scandal and lawsuit by hundreds of women who were raped by male guards at another prison that was closed shortly thereafter. And she can’t be murdered, tortured, or assaulted non-sexually, brutally, viciously, and sadistically, by male criminals, and doesn’t have to worry about same until she’s released from prison.

And, moreover, the second stage of her draconian/Orwellian sentence -if she’s released from prison after 8-years and if she dies in her 70s or 80s or even 90s or hundreds- will be 3 or 4 or even 5 or 6 times longer

All this for a women who has never committed a violent or other malum in se crime in her life and never will and is not a “threat to society” or to anyone nor even a “danger” to “re-offend” by having sex with another young man under statutory age -an infinitely remote possibility that no sane person would obsess over during the day or lose any sleep over at night. In reality as opposed to fantasy, not a single person in the state of Michigan, child and adult, has been or will be any safer because of the enslavement of Abigail Simon for at least 8-years followed by decades of quasi-totalitarian persecution. No violent or other serious crime has been or will be prevented or deterred by her hideously draconian/Orwellian life-sentence. In respect to “protecting the public” and children and deterring and preventing violent and other serious criminality, her grotesque sentence is wholly gratuitous, “cruel and unusual” in the sense of being not only cruel but also totally unnecessary.

She’s enslaved, broken, degraded, immiserated, her life ruined, doomed until she dies, forever a victim of mass psychosis, hysteria, ignorance, fanaticism, “moral panic,” ideology, politics, and the resultant oppression, cruelty, iniquity,, and persecution. And for what? For nothing -for no exigent, rational,  imperative, and justifiable reason whatsoever- for those of us who are sane and just and honest and realistic.

To call all of this insane is an understatement. It’s beyond insanity!

 

Beyond insanity: a recidivist criminal and gangster who killed a man by shooting him twice in the head during a robbery will serve less time in prison than Abigail

25 Monday Jul 2022

Posted by Michael Kuehl in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

This Friday, 7/22/22m on Jesse Watters primetime, the host featured the case of a “gang-banger” and recidivist criminal, probably an alien rather than a citizen and possibly an illegal alien, a grotesque Mestizo-Amerindian freak with tattoos on his face and neck, who was sentenced to 50-years in prison in California for killing a man during a robbery by shooting him twice in the head but just released after serving only 6-years.

Like nearly all black and “brown” recidivist criminals, gangsters and free-lancers, I’m sure he has a history of crime that began at age 14 or 15 (or even 13 or 12 if pubescent) and has committed many violent and other mala in se felonies and served at least a few and months in jail and prison before he was convicted of murder and given a 50-year sentence. But he’ll serve less time in prison for this murder than will Abigail, a first-offender convicted of nonviolent and victimless and mala prohibita felonies, a woman who has never committed a violent or other mala in se crime in her life and never will and is not a “threat to society” or to anyone nor even a danger to “re-offend” by having sex with another young man under statutory age.

Watters noted that soon after his release from prison, the “gang-banger” was attested for “driving under the influence” of alcohol, drugs, or both, possession of an illegal weapon, and resisting arrested, jailed, indicted, and then released, almost immediately, with no bail, lunacy that is now routine in New York and California and other jurisdictions

Beyond Insanity: Will Abigail be Released from Prison on November 26, after “only” 8-years of Incarceration?

23 Saturday Jul 2022

Posted by Michael Kuehl in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Will Abigail be released from prison on Nov. 26 of this year, in 4-months and 3-days, the earliest date she can be released, officially, under the law, released after “only: 8-years of enslavement, misery and monotony, fear and anxiety, torment and travail, powerlessness and dehumanization; and also abuse, verbal for certain, e.g., harassment, bullying, vilification, threats of violence, implicit and explicit, and likely also physical in that it would a miracle if she’s never been assaulted during 7-years and 8-months of enslavement in jail and then in a prison with hundreds of low-IQ, white-hating, inner-city blacks, most of them violent, and also hundreds of poor and working-class whites, many of them violent.

Probably but not a certainty. Not if she still contends, whether or not she’s telling the truth, that her “victim” was the victimizer, if not the “whole truth and nothing but the truth,” as witnesses swear to uphold as they “take the stand,” then perhaps most of the truth and likely some of the truth. Assuming she’s telling the truth in whole or in part about her “victim” raping and bullying and terrorizing and manipulating her, how egregious and unjust and ironic that her refusal to lie in full would likely result in her not being released from prison on November 26.

Not if she refuses to grovel before her inquisitors, the fanatical and dogmatic CSA victimologists and left-feminist ideologues and totalitarians who will decide her fate on or shortly before Nov. 26, expressing “contrition” and “remorse” for the “heinous” crime of having sex with a 15-year-old biological man, a 6′ 3″, 220 lb. football star whom she accused of forcing himself on her and controlling her life by threats and manipulation; and apologizing to her “victim,” directly, if he’s present, or indirectly, on his behalf if not present, to his mother, who’ll surely be present, and who’ll surely implore the fanatics and inquisitors and CSA victimologists, the authorities and “experts” who rule her life and have done so for years and who’ll decide her fate during the parole hearing, not to release her from prison after “only” 8-years in and of hell if she isn’t “contrite” and apologetic and perhaps even if she is “contrite” and apologetic, profusely and debasingly so, and dishonestly if she’s telling the truth about her “victim” being the victimizer.

But even if Abigail is released after “only” 8-years of imprisonment, she’ll never be free, as I explain in depth and detail in other articles and blogposts. Only death will free her.

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Subscribe

  • Entries (RSS)
  • Comments (RSS)

Archives

  • October 2025
  • April 2024
  • February 2024
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • December 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • April 2022
  • November 2021
  • July 2021
  • May 2021
  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • July 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • January 2020
  • July 2019
  • November 2018
  • September 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016

Categories

  • "anarcho-tyranny"
  • "sex-offender treatment"
  • "traumatization"
  • Abigail Simon
  • Abigail Simon sentence
  • age of consent
  • appeal
  • Barton Dieters
  • Cassandra
  • Cassandra Sorenson-Grohall
  • criminal sentences
  • CSA victimology
  • Debra Lafave
  • feminism
  • innate sex differences, embodiment, maleness and femaleness
  • Jeffrey Epstein
  • John Derbyshire, Debra Lafave
  • Kathryn Ronk
  • lawsuit
  • Mary Letourneau
  • media coverage, sensationalism
  • Melissa Bittner
  • Melisssa Bittner
  • MRAs, "men's movement
  • plea-bargain
  • prison security levels
  • prisoner rights, mail, censorship
  • sex offender registry
  • statutory rape
  • Uncategorized
  • Willie Horton
  • women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters"
  • women as rapists
  • women sex offenders

Meta

  • Create account
  • Log in

  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • freeabigailsimon
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • freeabigailsimon
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar