The public registry was enacted after a few monsters, all men, kidnapped, raped, tortured, and murdered young children, boys and girls (e.g., Adam Walsh, Megan’s law), and was then expanded over the years to include most and then virtually all men and women convicted of sexual offenses, guilty or innocent, from rapes and gang-rapes that included abductions, brutal, vicious, and sadistic beatings, torture, mutilation, and murder to women allowing biological men under age 16 or even 18 to penetrate them in de facto consensual relationships -the only crime in which the “victims” enjoy the actus reus (i.e., the sex” more than the women who “rape” and “molest” them and are often if not usually the aggressors and initiators of their phantasmal and theoretical “victimization,” in some cases even raping and molesting in fact the women who “raped” and “molested” them under the law and in the minds of CSA victimologists and the untold millions of people they’ve succeeded in browbeating and indoctrinating, e.g., Cassandra Sorenson-Grohall, Melissa Bitter, and Abigail if she’s telling most or some of the truth about her “victim” being the victimizer.

And thus even women like Cassandra, Melissa, Abigail, and hundreds like them, first-offenders convicted of nonviolent and victimless and mala prohibitum felonies, women who’ve never committed a volent or other serious crime in their lives and never will and are not a “threat to society” or to anyone nor even a danger to re-offend by having sex with another young man under statutory age -and, in some instances, were the de facto victims of their de jure “victims”- are compelled to register for life or at least 20-30 years as uniquely deviant and dangerous criminals, based on the myth and dogma that they’re a danger to re-offend when I’d be amazed if even one woman who was sentenced to months in jail or years in prison has re-offended by having sex with another young men under statutory age, and possibly even a threat to commit acts of sexual violence that include abductions, torture, and murder.

Another irony is that there is no reason for monsters who kidnap, rape, torture, and murder young children, or monsters like the Carr Brothers and the Knoxville savages and many others who rape and murder adults and underage teenagers, to have their names, mugshots, and addresses on public sex-offender registries, since they will either die in prison or be executed and are thus no danger to young children, teenagers, or adults of both sexes. The only people they can assault, sexually or non-sexually, and murder are a small number of male inmates and guards and others of both sexes in prison with them and with whom they closely interact.

On Fox News, for example, right-wing hosts and guests are alarmed and incensed that some leftists (they’d like all or most to believe all or most) are trivializing the evil and crime of pedophilia by calling this perversion and disorder “minor attraction’ and pedophiles are “minor attractive.”

A minor is a person, male or female, under the age of 18. Young men and women of 16 and 17 are minors. and the generic age of consent is 16 in most US states and 14 or 15 in many other nations, including European countries. If attraction to young men and women of 16 and 17 or 14 and 15 is “pedophilia,” then almost all people, men and women, adults and adolescents, heterosexual and homosexual, are “pedophiles.” And, ironically, the only people who are not attracted to young men and women under the age of 18 are pedophiles who are exclusively attracted to prepubescent children.

Pedophilia is attraction to prepubescent children. And a pedophile is a man (including older male adolescents) with a fixation on and obsession with prepubescent girls or boys. It’s debatable if women can even be pedophiles under the APA definition for the same reason that few if any women are fetishists, at least not in the sense that males are fetishists

The ultimate absurdity is defining women as “rapists” and “pedophiles”.for allowing biological men under age 16 or even 18 to penetrate them in de facto consensual relationships -the only crime in which the “victims” enjoy the actus reus (i.e., the sex) more than the women who “rape” and “molest” them and are often if not usually the aggressors and initiators of their phantasmal and theoretical “victimization.”

Several months ago a cabal of CSA victimologists persuaded bing.com to remove my website address from their search engine. Luckily, they didn’t succeed with google.com. Since roughly 80-90% of my views came from bing.com rather than google.com and a few other sources, the number of views I now receive is only a fraction of those I received before the purge.

So when I received 46 views on Nov. 21 and 42 on Nov. 22, I was sure this was not a freakish coincidence, but explained by Abigail’s release from prison. And thus I searched for her name on MIchigan’s public sex offender registry, and was glad to see that she was no longer in prison but now living in Grand Blanc, MI, with family I assume.

Since Abigail is a “convicted sex offender, with a “child” as her “victim, she’s enjoined from using the internet. So nearly all of the 88 views on Nov. 21 and 22 were by family and friends.

So, apparently, she was released from prison on the Nov. 19 or 20, roughly a week before the official release date of Nov. 26, a modest act of kindness by the authorities, surprisingly, so she could be with her family before and during Thanksgiving.

Since her address was on the sex offender registry, I sent her a letter on Tuesday of last week that she likely received on Friday or Saturday. I have many question -to which, hopefully, I’ll get answers- questions about the intrigue, whatever occurred exactly, with her de jure “victim,” factually consensual sex which is punished as a felony under Michigan law with a maximum sentence of 25-years to life in prison and a lifetime of quasi-totalitarian surveillance and persecution; her arrest, prosecution, trial, conviction, and sentence; her life in jail and prison and thereafter.

Questions she could not answer during her 8-years in prison -since, as noted previously, she was not allowed to receive and read a letter and articles and blogposts I sent her on the grounds that my heterodox, to many truly sacrilegious, contentions and arguments were “a threat to security, good order, and discipline.”