Monthly Archives: November 2017

Beyond Insanity: Woman teacher sentenced to 40-Years in prison for having sex with 14-year-old male student

29 Wednesday Nov 2017

Posted by in "anarcho-tyranny", age of consent, criminal sentences, CSA victimology, MRAs, "men's movement, plea-bargain, statutory rape, Uncategorized, women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters", women as rapists, women sex offenders

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

, , , , ,

From news.com (8/16/2013):

Teacher jailed for 40-years for sex with student age 14. From Daily Mail, 2-18- Shannon Alicia Schmieder, 39, will have to serve 20 years in the toughest sentence ever handed out by a U.S. court to a teacher accused of underage sex, The Daily Mail reported (February 18, 2012).

And from human-stupidity.com (8/16/13):

Female teacher Shannon Alicia Schmieder, in Coweta, Georgia received a 40-year jail sentence for sex with a 14-year-old boy. This fills some men’s rights proponents with glee: finally a woman gets a taste of the bitter “age of consent” medicine concocted by feminists and religious zealots: the same high jail terms men routinely get sentenced to. Making love carries the same prison term as murder or manslaughter.

Actually, her 40-year prison (not jail) sentence “fills” nearly all MRAs with “glee.” And her sentence, if she serves the full 40-years, is roughly 7-times more severe than the average-time served for murder, and almost 4-times more severe if she’s paroled after “only” 20-years. 40-years in prison, under a plea-bargain, apparently, and she won’t be eligible for parole until she’s been enslaved and abused and degraded for 20 years in a chthonic Georgia prison -at least 20-years if not longer in a country in which, during the 1990’s, the decade in which the U.S. began to “get tough on crime,” the average time-served for murder was less than 6-years and the average time-served for all violent felonies (aggravated assault, robbery, rape, and homicide) was approximately 4-years! And one can be sure that over-90% of these felonies, among the male offenders, were committed by recidivists, most of whom should have been in prison rather than free to commit more violent felonies. And given their crime rates in relation to those of females, males are the beneficiaries, overwhelmingly, of this systemic leniency.

So it’s not true that adult men, including violent and/or recidivist criminals, are “routinely” sentenced to 40-years in prison for having sex with pubescent teenagers under statutory age. I doubt if the average sentence for all adult men, including those with prior criminal records, is even 4-5 years. It’s true that male teachers are often sentenced to 10-20 years in prison for having love affairs and mere trysts with underage female and male adolescents in a country in which violent and/or recidivist male criminals are routinely and systematically coddled.

But rather than decry and oppose the hideously draconian prison sentences often inflicted on male teachers and the draconian/Orwellian post-incarceration punishments inflicted on all male teachers -virtually all of whom are first-offenders convicted of nonviolent and usually victimless and mala prohibita felonies that are often legal acts (or perhaps misdemeanors) in dozens of other nations, including European countries, men who’ve never committed a violent or other mala in se crime in their lives and almost surely never will and are not a “threat to society” or to anyone nor usually even a danger to re-offend by having sex with another underage teenager- MRAs demand that the lives of women be destroyed by the same hideously draconian/Orwellian punishments.

So pathological and virulent and obsessive is their hatred of women and lust for vengeance -against not only those they revile and asperse as “feminazis” but women in general and white females in particular, usually because of the actions of one or a few women in their personal lives, nearly always ex-wives, and/or sexual frustration- that they’re willing to destroy the lives of myriads of men who are not violent or dangerous in order to destroy the lives of a much smaller number of women who transport biological men under statutory age to carnal Elysium.

And with a distinctly venomous fixation on and obsession with notorious “rapists” and “pedophiles” like Mary Letourneau, Debra Lafave, and other teachers who, in contrast to men in the inverted fantasy world these deranged misogynists inhabit, nearly always receive “a slap on the wrist” and little or no serious punishment.

Consummate and tireless practitioners of the logical fallacy of confirmation bias, “masculinists” cherry-pick cases in which men are sentenced to 20-30 years in prison for having sex with underage adolescents, males and females, and contrast them with cases of women who receive probation or “only” 6-12 months in jail or “only” 1 or 2 years in prison, thus advancing the lie and canard that men are nearly always sentenced to 20 or 30 years in prison while women are nearly always sentenced to probation or a few months in jails that are benign and liveable compared to male prisons and the male housing units of jails -not because male inmates, generally, are far more violent, brutal, vicious, sadistic, predatory, etc., but because of “misandry” and anti-male “sexism” and discrimination. Men are crucified, almost invariably, their lives destroyed, while female “rapists,” “predators,” “child molesters,” and “pedophiles” are shockingly and scandalously indulged, almost invariably, walking away with a “slap-on-the-wrist.”

Tell that to Shannon Schmieder, Michelle Taylor, Abigail Simon, Kathryn Ronk, Mary Letourneau, Cassandra Sorenson-Grohall, Melissa Bittner (a transparently innocent women who was sentenced to a year in prison for “sexual assaults” that were committed against her by her “victim,” a 16-year-old criminal who was charged with murder shortly thereafter), Pamela Rogers. and many other women who are punished more or even far more severely than myriads of violent male criminals, usually recidivists, who commit aggravated assaults, muggings, armed robberies, gang-shootings, home invasions, rape, gang-rapes, and murders.

And even those who are sentenced to probation or “only” 6-12 months in hellish jails are actually sentenced to a lifetime or at at least 20-30 years of draconian/Orwellian persecution, including public registration (their names, mug-shots, and addresses on the internet for all to see and what that entails in regard to danger and mortification) as uniquely dangerous and degenerate criminals, unlike myriads of male brutes and savages with histories of crime and violence beginning at age 13 or 14 who’ve committed dozens and scores of violent and other mala in se crimes  but have never been convicted of a sexual offense albeit most of them have committed rapes and/or gang-rapes either of men in jails and prisons and/or of women and adolescent girls in the free world.

Even Debra Lafave, one of few women, and perhaps the only female, to receive probation with no jail time since the Letourneau hysteria of 1997, was punished more severely in many ways than violent and/or recidivist male criminals who’ve never been convicted of a sexual offense: 3-years of house-arrest (prohibited from leaving her mother’s house while not working), 7-years of parole, at least 10 years of electronic parole-monitoring with an ankle-tether/”bracelet” she could never remove; restrictions of her freedoms and intrusions into her private life that don’t apply to violent and/or recidivist male criminals who’ve never been convicted of a sexual offense (she was arrested and jailed and could have been sentenced to 15-years in prison for talking to a 17-year-old female co-worker about non-work related matters at a fast-food restaurant); and a life-sentence of public sex-offender registration.

Yes, all this was/is a “slap on the wrist” for the vile and heinous crime of engaging in a few acts of coitus and fellatio with a young man under statutory age, consensual sex the memories of which the de jure “victim” will forever cherish. And this was defined as “rape” and Debra as a “rapist” and the young man as a “victim” who is “traumatized” and “scarred for life” by having sex with a gorgeous and ravishing 23-year-old woman. The only suffering and “trauma” he endured was a result of the law and criminal justice system, and the media and its histrionic and sensationalist coverage, not only local and state but also national and even international, turning Debra into the most infamous and despised woman sex criminal since Mary Letourneau.

 

 

Beyond Insanity: 34-year-old Nevada woman sentenced to life in prison for allegedly “forcing” a 13-year-old male to touch her breast.

27 Monday Nov 2017

Posted by in "anarcho-tyranny", "sex-offender treatment", "traumatization", age of consent, plea-bargain, Uncategorized, women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters", women sex offenders

≈ 3 Comments

Tags

, , , , ,

“Does the Punishment Fit the Crime? ” So asks www. kolotv.com. in a brief article:

An Elko County woman convicted of forcing a 13-year-old boy to touch her breasts was sentenced to life in prison. Michelle Lyn Taylor, 34, was convicted of lewdenss with a minor under 14 in November. Taylor’s attorney, public defender Alina Kilpatrick says it is the harshest sentence ever dealt to a female sex offender in Nevada. Kilpatrick  called the sentence unconstitutional. “This is cruel and unusual punishment,” Kilpatrick said. “She put his hand on her boob while she was wearing a bra, now she’s getting life.”

Elko County District Attorney Gary Woodbury said Taylor was “convicted of precisely what she did,” and under the state sentencing guidelines, life in prison was mandatory. Woodbury says Taylor did not want to negotiate a plea deal because she did not want to have to register as a sex offender. Woodbury says Taylor felt her life would be over if she had to register (as a sex offender) so it wouldn’t matter what she was convicted of.  Woodbury says while it might be some adolescent male’s fantasy to have sex with a woman, in this case it was a traumatic event. The child has needed and continues to receive therapy.

She was arrested, prosecuted, and convicted at trial in 2010. Apparently, she was so drunk that she didn’t even recall what occurred exactly. And, apparently, she was found guilty of this heinous crime solely on the “he said/she said” uncorroborated testimony of a 13-year-old male. There was no physical evidence, obviously, nor any neutral witnesses.

According to some accounts, Taylor wanted to have sex with the young man. In the fantasy world inhabited by CSA victimologists, most of whom are women and nearly all of whom are feminists and left-liberals, and that of MRAs, the misogynist lunatics of the soi-disant “men’s rights movement,” and all those they’ve brainwashed, biological men under age 16 or 18 (and even “adults” of 18 if the woman is a teacher or tutor like Abigail Simon) are too impotent and innocent and paralyzed by fear to say “no” and reject the advances of a female who is an adult and at least 4-5 years older -albeit they are horrified and repulsed by the prospect of having sex with them even if they’re as ravishing as Debra Lafave or as lovely as Mary Letourneau. But in this situation, obviously, a 13-year-old male was fully capable of saying “no” and resisting a woman’s advances and importunities, probably because she was overweight, unattractive, and sloppy drunk.

“A traumatic event” and “the child has needed and continues to receive therapy.” To MRAs and CSA victimologists, all such “events” -whether love affairs or trysts or even a single act of “sexual contact”- are “non-consensual”  and coercive by definition and “traumatic” for the “child” and “victim” irrespective of the facts and circumstances. The young men are “victims” of “rape” and CSA even if they were the aggressors and initiators and even if they raped and/or molested their “victimizers.’ And they’re devastated and “traumatized”  and must be subjected to months or even years of psycho-therapy, even if they claim to have enjoyed the sex, whether coitus or fellatio or simply kissing and fondling and “sexual contact,” because they did enjoy it many or  or a few times or just once , usually far more than the women who “raped” and “molested” them, and thus are not aware of being “traumatized” because, in fact as opposed to fantasy,  they were and are not “traumatized.”

In reality, any “trauma” he suffered was a corollary of Nevada’s draconian sex-crime laws, the criminal justice system, the trial, cross-examination, the media coverage, and mandatory psycho-therapy which in theory can only cure or mollify his “trauma” by persuading him that he was “traumatized” and “scarred for life” by touching a woman breast while she was wearing a bra, not by the act of touching a woman’s breast in private, And how can a woman “force” a young man to touch her breast “against his will” if he’s bigger and stronger than her?

It would be interesting and revealing to know the average time-served in Nevada for males convicted of violent crimes: aggravated assaults, robbery, violent/forcible rapes, gang shootings, home invasions, murder, etc. And I’m sure that over 90% of the males who commit such felonies are recidivists, a majority  of whom should have been in prison rather than free to commit more violent and mala in se felonies. And what is the average time-served in jail or prison for adult men who have sex with underage teenagers?

And are men guilty of a felony with a mandatory sentence of life in prison if convicted at trial of forcing adolescent girls under age 14 to touch their chests while clothed? Men don’t have breasts, of course, but they have nipples. And women are guilty of felonies and defined and vilified as “rapists” for engaging in coitus with biological men under statutory age even though they don’t have penises with which to penetrate and impregnate their “victims.”

The public defender noted that the woman was wearing a bra when she allegedly “forced” the young man to touch her breast. I assume that she would have received a life sentence if she was wearing not only a bra but also a blouse or sweater or winter coat when she allegedly “forced” him to touch her breast.

Finally, if a young man of 13 or 14 or 15  (or even 16 or 17 in states in which the generic age of consent is 17 or 18 rather than 16) is “traumatized” by touching an adult woman’s breast while she’s fully clothed or wearing a bra, then what of infants who suck their mother’s nipples every day during months of breast-feeding? Should breast-feeding be criminalized, as a felony, at least if the mother claims that she enjoys the sensations of her baby sucking her nipples and finds it at least mildly erotic? Or in all instances, with all the penalties that are inflicted on adult women who have affairs or trysts or engage in a single act of sexual contact with biological men under statutory age?

Realism and Sanity from “the Derb”: “Sex Equality Dogma taken to Lunatic Extremes”

27 Monday Nov 2017

Posted by in age of consent, criminal sentences, CSA victimology, Debra Lafave, John Derbyshire, Debra Lafave, statutory rape, Uncategorized, women as "pedophiles" and "child molesters", women as rapists

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , ,

Writes John Derbyshire:

O’Reilly implodes; Is Bill O’Reilly finally imploding? I am still a regular viewer of the Factor, but I find that more and more often I turn it off after ten minutes or so to do something more rewarding.

For one thing, there’s his bullying and grandstanding about child molesters. Now, I not a big fan of child molesters, having two kids of my own. The real monsters, though, are a minuscule minority of those who would be swept up by the kinds of laws O’Reilly is arguing for. The majority would be harmless, clueless, sad types who had yielded to, or been led on to, the momentary of some petty fumbling, then been ready to commit suicide when they realized what they had done. People like that need to be chastised and set straight, but they don’t need the magnum sentences they’d get under Sandra’s law, or whatever the hell thing it is O’Reilly is bellowing for.

Even weirder is O’Reilly’s  conviction that the seduction of 14-year-old boys by pretty 25-year-old teachers is just as bad –precisely the same! deserves the identical sentence!- as the contrary thing with a 14-year-old girl and a 25-year-old male teacher. This is sex equality dogma taken to lunatic extremes, as I’ve argued in a previous diary. I’d expect this kind of junk jurisprudence from some glaring feminist, but why am I getting it from O’Reilly? (johnderbyshire.com/opinion/diaries/2006-04)

Actually, the view that the two acts are precisely the same and deserve the identical sentence informs the laws of all 50 states and has done so for decades and has long been espoused by virtually all of our ruling-elites and governing-classes, left and right and center: politicians, the media, SVU detectives, prosecutors, Judges, etc. What JD describes as “weird” is now a sacred and inviolate dogma, and for the elites and a plurality of people they’ve poisoned and propagandized, to confute this absurdity is comparable to denying the holocaust or defending slavery and segregation.

It should also be noted that in most of these intrigues, the woman isn’t even guilty of seduction. Either the “victim” is the aggressor and initiator or their sexual union could be described as a mutual coming together.

And though adult women allowing biological men under statutory age to penetrate them in de facto consensual relationships is not “as bad” or precisely the same as adult men penetrating and often impregnating underage adolescent girls, I also oppose draconian and “magnum” sentences for adult men who have love affairs or mere dalliances with young women under statutory age if they are first-offenders with no history of violent or other mala in se criminality.

A Sane Comment: This Matter could have been Resolved Privately

14 Tuesday Nov 2017

Posted by in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

To quote Liz DeRuchie:

The one thing I found very strange that I’ve never heard addressed, and should be, is why the boy’s mother went straight to police without discussing the matter with her son, and looking on his phone. I think the sentence and characterization of the participants was ludicrous but why would you put your son through a criminal investigation at the age of 16 or so….maybe that will be more damaging than the ill-conceived affair in the long run. Did his mom not talk to either her son or the teacher…Could this tragedy have been averted by early, adult intervention outside a criminal courtroom?

The answer is yes; This “tragedy” could have been “averted” without calling the police and destroying Abigail’s life and putting her son through the crucible and travail of a criminal investigation and prosecution.

Now if one’s daughter is brutally raped or one’s son is brutally assaulted by violent and dangerous criminals, whether they’re 15 or 25 or 35, parents have no choice but to call the police and subject their son or daughter to the ordeal of a criminal investigation and prosecution, including the ordeal of having them testify in court and endure the rigors of cross-examination by defense attorneys if the assailant pleads “not guilty.” In fact, they’re morally behooved to do so not only to ensure “justice” for their son or daughter but also to protect them and future victims by punishing and incarcerating violent and dangerous criminals. But such was not the case in this situation and in regard to such intrigues generally.

Let us assume, for the sake of argument, that Abigail was and is lying about his raping and terrorizing her and that they were “madly n love” or, at least, engaged in a factually consensual and mutually gratifying relationship. Instead of calling the police, his mother and father could have confronted Abigail, at school or in her apartment, and told her what would happen, the hellish ordeal that she would suffer, if someone knew or suspected that she was having sex with a 15-year-old male student and called the police or told the principal, for example. Or that they would call the police if she didn’t end the affair and that her life would be destroyed. And they could have told their son that they’d call the police if he didn’t end the affair and that Abigail’s life would be destroyed if they did so. Or they could have talked to both of them together, describing at length and in graphic detail the fate she would suffer if they didn’t end the affair.

I’m sure this would have ended the intrigue, at least until he turned 16, and nobody would have been hurt, profoundly and permanently, if at all if they weren’t “madly” and “deeply” in love but simply enjoyed having sex together  -not only Abigail, by far most hellishly, and her family and friends, whose anguish is harrowing, but also the “victim” and his family. “More damaging” than the affair “in “the long run.” Any suffering and pain he endured and will endure in the short and “long run” -suffering and pain that is real as opposed to imagined and contrived and exaggerated- is not a result of his having had sex with Abigail but wholly a result of the insane and execrable laws of Michigan, the criminal justice system, and the media. local, state, and national, especially the coverage of the trial and sentencing.

And if she’s lying and they were “madly” or just “deeply” in love, they could have resumed their affair when he turned 16 if she was no longer his tutor, since the generic age of consent is 16 in Michigan, and his parents could have done nothing, legally, to end it. To repeat: if he had been 16 rather than 15, just a few months and weeks older, and she had not been his tutor, their affair would have been legal under Michigan law. But since he was 15, just a few months and weeks short of his 16th birthday, and she was his tutor, she was guilty of a felony with a maximum sentence of 25-years to life in prison and a mandatory minimum of 8-25 years and a life-sentence of public sex offender registration and electronic parole-monitoring with a ankle-tether/”bracelet” she can never remove.

To repeat once again; to call all his insane -particularly the arbitrary and irrational and hideously draconian laws- is an understatement. It’s beyond insanity.

 

Beyond Insanity: Justice in Delaware

11 Saturday Nov 2017

Posted by in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Spree Shooter Radee Labeeb Prince was a One-Man Crime Who Got a Free Ride from the Delaware Criminal Justice System. (nicholasstixuncensored, 10/26/2017)

Anonymous reader opines: “(T)his animal enjoyed almost 20 years of “affirmative action justice” for innumerable felonious assaults….From a reading of this article, it appears that he was never convicted of anything that resulted in a Jail sentence: Astonishing.” (“Mass shooting suspect: many prior arrests, few convictions” (Wilmington News Journal, Oct. 18, 2017)

N.S.: He repeatedly skipped out on court dates, but instead of hunting him down additionally, prosecutors would reward him by dropping the previous charges, and declining to charge him for being a fugitive. In other words, the more crimes he committed, the more prosecutors rewarded him.

In Baltimore, Freddie Gray’s arrest record contained all sorts of charges without dispositions. In Atlanta, Shamal Thompson committed one felony after another, without ever being punished, as judges and prosecutors kept issuing him black-man-gets-out-of-jail-free cards, until he murdered Eugenia Jeanne Calle. Meanwhile, in New York, Daryl Thomas committed one First-Degree Rape after another, but the NYPD kept giving him freebies, writing up his forcible rapes as “trespassing.”

Almost 20 years of violent and other mala in se felonies and 42 arrests and he was free to shoot 5 people, killing 3 of them! Not a day in prison or even jail, apparently?

I wonder how many women, teachers and others, are now in prison in Delaware for allowing biological men under age 16 or even 18 to penetrate them in factually consensual relationships. And over the last 20 years, the same period in which Prince committed violent felony after violent felony and was arrested 42 times but was never sentenced to prison or even jail, apparently,how many women, teachers and others, were sentenced to prison or jail for engaging in acts of coitus and/or fellatio with underage pubescent teenage males?

Or for even a single act of “sexual contacts” in a fleeting tryst like the women in Nevada who was sentenced to life in prison in 2010 for allegedly “forcing” a young man of 13 to touch her breast.